Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UNSKEWED Projection of the 2012 Presidential Race
unskewedpolls.com ^ | October 25, 2012 | staff

Posted on 10/25/2012 11:55:14 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota

The QStarNews projection of the 2012 presidential race sees Mitt Romney being elected the next president of the United States with 53.63 percent of the popular vote and 359 electoral votes to President Obama's 45.92 percent and 179 electoral votes.

QStarNews predicts the turnout nationally will includes 34.8 percent Republicans, 35.2 percent Democrats, and 30.0 percent independents. QStarNews predicts turnout will rise by about four percent, or a total of about 130,955,000 voters including about 600,000 for third party candidates and the rest going to Romney and Obama.

Methodology: For EACH state, all of the following information was considered: results from the last four elections averaged together, recent political trends in that state (such as Republicans winning control of both houses of the state legislature in 2010 in Maine and New Hampshire), recent trends in demographic makeup that affect the politics of the state (such as the growth of hispanics in Colorado causing the Democratic Party to become more competitive), and the degree to which one or both of the major campaigns are targetting that state, such as both campaigns making Ohio the most important state and campaigning there more than any other state, and any other relevant political factors and data such as public polls from a variety of pollling firms, as well as data from the QStarNews polls of the presidential race. From all of this information a percentage breakdown of each state is calculated between Romney and Obama. This projection is expected to be spot-on accurate for predicting the outcome in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and close to the actual popular vote.

Perhaps some of the most surprising states to some will be the following:

(Excerpt) Read more at unskewedpolls.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: LucianOfSamasota

I think this is possible if everything breaks right. I love it that Oregon and Minnesota and Michigan go red. No one is expecting that. Maine could even tip. The Left will be in complete meltdown.


41 posted on 10/25/2012 4:49:22 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
If both OR and MN go to R&R I will eat my hat. Reagan couldn't get MN in ‘84 in the face of a 49-state win. I know Mondull was the favorite son then, but, geez, the ‘Rats are so entrenched there. He couldn't get MN in ‘80 either even though he clobbered Carter nationwide. G. H. W. Bush lost both MN and OR in his ‘88 landslide. I'd love to have to eat my hat, but I don't think it's going to happen.
42 posted on 10/25/2012 4:52:11 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler; All
We're talkin' about a man who cut his political teeth with the founders of the Weather Underground, and spent his formative years as part of the 20th Century's most corrupt political machine.

And add to that a man who most likely wasn't born in the United states, and, if so, is probably not even an American citizen.

What kind of a dumbed down electorate do we have if they elected him once and we still have to be concerned about the possibility of a second term!!!

43 posted on 10/25/2012 5:00:41 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Well I hope so but off year elections don’t always indicate presidential elections
Boobs who don’t realize congress matters vote ONLY in the presidential elections
Democrats got slaughtered in 94
Clinton won in 96
But the economy was booming then


44 posted on 10/25/2012 5:02:35 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Hey, chimera, Republicans have won statewide elections in MN not all that long ago. Remember Tim Pawlenty? Remember Norm Coleman?
45 posted on 10/25/2012 5:06:22 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TheGeezer

“Is anyone old enough to remember Reagan 1980?”

I voted for Reagan 1980 absentee ballot - I was out of the country at the time. I also remember 20 years earlier when I voted in my first presidential election...1st of three times I voted for Nixon. In 1960 I was in the military.


46 posted on 10/25/2012 5:26:52 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

I have tabulated the data here in an Excel spreadsheet, did some other things to it, and plan to use it Election night to check results against this projection. Could be interesting.

Here in Ohio where I am, I sense the winds are blowing a tide that is favorable to Romney. If this is correct, it could be over quickly...News at 11...

If the rest of this map is close to what actually happens, Ohio won’t matter and there will be no ‘hanging chads’. to challenge.

DISCLAIMER: I am not saying that this prognostication is correct, but I see some encouragement in all this. Note to all...achieving these kinds of numbers requires that we ALL get out there and vote, and that we encourage as many right minded folks that we know to do the same.


47 posted on 10/25/2012 5:42:23 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Ohio elected Kasic and a ton of other conservatives....that is a sea change


48 posted on 10/25/2012 5:49:21 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

You don’t think 94 was a sea change
It stopped Clinton’s domestic programs in their tracks


49 posted on 10/25/2012 5:54:16 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I think 1980 was a sea change

1994 could have been but there was no follow on PLUS between Dole and the dem smear campaign on Ken Starr....it’s only about sex...the economy was still good and there was no driving desire to swap presidents except by conservatives. That may be a swell but not a change


50 posted on 10/25/2012 5:56:52 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
Below is the map of the electoral votes and then below that the raw data showing both percentages and actual projected number of votes for the two candidates in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Historical data from the last four elections is included for comparing.



Data from last four elections and projection of popular vote by state for 2012

State Clinton 1996 Dole 1996 Gore 2000 Bush 2000 Kerry 2004 Bush 2004 Obama 2008 McCain 2008 State Projected Obama Projected Romney Projected pop Obama Projected pop Romney
Alabama 43.00 50.00 42.00 56.00 37.00 63.00 39.00 60.00 Alabama 35.60 65.22 776249 1422106
Alaska 33.00 51.00 28.00 59.00 35.50 61.10 37.70 60.20 Alaska 28.90 65.80 83295 189648
Arizona 46.00 44.00 45.00 51.00 44.40 54.90 45.00 53.80 Arizona 40.45 58.90 883941 1287123
Arkansas 54.00 37.00 46.00 51.00 44.50 54.40 38.80 58.80 Arkansas 41.18 58.27 454321 642868
California 51.00 38.00 53.00 42.00 54.30 44.40 60.90 37.30 California 57.15 42.40 7008802 5199881
Colorado 44.00 46.00 42.00 51.00 47.00 51.70 53.50 44.90 Colorado 44.98 54.37 1056479 1277029
Connecticut 52.00 35.00 56.00 38.00 54.30 43.90 60.50 38.30 Connecticut 51.05 46.77 857386 785503
Delaware 52.00 37.00 55.00 42.00 53.30 45.80 61.90 37.00 Delaware 53.90 45.42 230766 194460
District of Columbia 85.00 9.00 85.00 9.00 89.20 9.30 92.90 6.50 District of Columbia 92.38 6.42 218465 15182
Florida 48.00 42.00 49.00 49.00 47.10 52.10 50.90 48.40 Florida 46.10 53.85 3912739 4570521
Georgia 46.00 47.00 43.00 55.00 41.40 58.00 47.00 52.20 Georgia 39.70 61.02 1622253 2493449
Hawaii 57.00 32.00 56.00 37.00 54.00 45.30 71.80 26.60 Hawaii 55.05 43.20 257352 201955
Idaho 34.00 52.00 28.00 67.00 30.30 68.40 36.10 61.50 Idaho 27.45 70.20 183371 468949
Illinois 54.00 37.00 55.00 43.00 54.80 44.50 61.80 36.90 Illinois 53.75 46.32 2991410 2577900
Indiana 42.00 47.00 41.00 57.00 39.30 59.90 49.90 49.00 Indiana 38.40 61.20 1092013 1740395
Iowa 50.00 40.00 49.00 48.00 49.30 49.90 54.00 44.70 Iowa 45.93 53.62 721347 842121
Kansas 36.00 54.00 37.00 58.00 36.60 62.00 41.40 56.80 Kansas 33.10 65.67 412027 817458
Kentucky 46.00 45.00 41.00 57.00 39.70 59.50 41.10 57.50 Kentucky 37.30 62.72 700965 1178674
Louisiana 52.00 40.00 45.00 53.00 42.20 56.70 39.90 58.60 Louisiana 40.13 60.05 812638 1216020
Maine 52.00 31.00 49.00 44.00 53.60 44.60 57.60 40.50 Maine 49.40 49.20 372260 370753
Maryland 54.00 38.00 56.00 40.00 56.00 43.00 61.90 36.80 Maryland 54.33 45.42 1436751 1201127
Massachusetts 61.00 28.00 60.00 33.00 62.00 36.90 62.00 36.20 Massachusetts 56.60 41.50 1780147 1305231
Michigan 52.00 38.00 51.00 46.00 51.20 47.80 57.40 40.90 Michigan 48.25 51.15 2488585 2638158
Minnesota 51.00 35.00 48.00 46.00 51.50 48.00 54.20 44.00 Minnesota 46.53 51.22 1391786 1532072
Mississippi 44.00 49.00 41.00 58.00 40.10 59.10 42.80 56.40 Mississippi 37.33 63.60 473545 806789
Missouri 47.00 41.00 47.00 50.00 46.10 53.30 49.30 49.40 Missouri 42.70 56.40 1292914 1707737
Montana 41.00 44.00 33.00 58.00 38.60 59.10 47.20 49.70 Montana 35.30 60.67 174777 300388
Nebraska 35.00 54.00 33.00 62.00 32.70 66.00 41.50 57.00 Nebraska 30.90 67.72 249953 547794
Nevada 44.00 43.00 46.00 50.00 48.10 50.70 55.10 42.70 Nevada 46.65 52.57 462332 521003
New Hampshire 49.00 39.00 47.00 48.00 50.40 49.00 54.30 44.80 New Hampshire 45.53 53.17 335376 391653
New Jersey 54.00 36.00 56.00 40.00 53.00 46.20 56.80 42.10 New Jersey 50.43 49.05 1922429 1869822
New Mexico 49.00 42.00 48.00 48.00 49.00 49.80 56.70 42.00 New Mexico 46.03 53.42 390653 453371
New York 59.00 31.00 60.00 35.00 58.40 40.10 62.20 36.70 New York 55.25 43.67 4025920 3182116
North Carolina 44.00 49.00 43.00 56.00 43.60 56.10 49.90 49.50 North Carolina 40.48 60.62 1799232 2694403
North Dakota 40.00 47.00 33.00 61.00 35.50 62.90 44.70 53.30 North Dakota 33.65 64.02 109402 208140
Ohio 47.00 40.00 46.00 50.00 48.70 50.80 51.20 47.20 Ohio 45.58 53.97 2493712 2952735
Oklahoma 40.00 48.00 38.00 60.00 34.40 65.60 34.40 65.60 Oklahoma 32.05 67.77 492013 1040365
Oregon 47.00 39.00 47.00 47.00 51.60 47.40 57.10 40.80 Oregon 46.03 51.52 811137 907881
Pennsylvania 49.00 40.00 51.00 46.00 51.00 48.50 54.70 44.30 Pennsylvania 46.78 52.67 2838495 3195885
Rhode Island 60.00 27.00 61.00 32.00 59.40 38.70 63.10 35.30 Rhode Island 56.23 41.22 258912 189798
South Carolina 44.00 50.00 41.00 57.00 41.00 58.10 44.90 53.80 South Carolina 38.08 62.70 747252 1230375
South Dakota 43.00 46.00 38.00 60.00 38.40 59.90 44.70 53.20 South Dakota 36.38 62.75 142828 246357
Tennessee 48.00 46.00 47.00 51.00 42.60 56.90 41.80 56.90 Tennessee 40.20 60.67 1076876 1625225
Texas 44.00 49.00 38.00 59.00 38.20 61.10 43.80 55.50 Texas 36.35 64.12 3049168 5378615
Utah 33.00 54.00 26.00 67.00 26.40 72.70 34.20 62.90 Utah 25.25 72.12 227283 649175
Vermont 53.00 31.00 51.00 41.00 58.90 38.80 67.80 30.60 Vermont 53.03 43.32 177009 144598
Virginia 45.00 47.00 44.00 52.00 45.60 53.80 52.70 46.40 Virginia 42.18 57.77 1631794 2234916
Washington 50.00 37.00 50.00 45.00 52.80 45.60 57.50 40.50 Washington 50.93 48.76 1414351 1354089
West Virginia 51.00 37.00 46.00 52.00 43.20 56.10 42.60 55.70 West Virginia 41.05 58.17 299871 424933
Wisconsin 49.00 39.00 48.00 48.00 49.70 49.40 56.30 42.40 Wisconsin 46.10 52.67 1417615 1619649
Wyoming 37.00 50.00 28.00 68.00 29.10 69.00 32.70 65.20 Wyoming 27.05 71.02 68488 179817
Total 49.00 41.00 48.00 48.00 48.30 50.70 53.00 46.00 Total 45.92 53.63 60128685 70226212



51 posted on 10/25/2012 6:01:56 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

1980
Nope

Reagan except for a couple years when the GOP had the senate had nothing but an antagonistic democrat congress

1994 till 2006 the GOP held the congress and from 2000-2006 had a GOP congress and president


52 posted on 10/25/2012 6:18:06 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks justiceseeker93 and cripplecreek.


53 posted on 10/25/2012 6:19:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
I thought Coleman lost to Frankenputz. Anyway, I was looking at Presidential tilts. In-state races they occasionally elect a ‘Pub. You have to go back 40 years to see the last time MN went for a ‘Pub candidate for President. That's two solid generations of blue. Cripes, even MA went for Reagan in ‘80 and ‘84.
54 posted on 10/25/2012 7:29:23 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: chimera

MN has no voter ID and same-day registration. Anyone can vote if somebody ‘vouches’ for them. Election oversite will be by the Soros SOS project enlistee Mark Ritchie (the former head of ACORN in MN). This is the same SOS that oversaw the endless recounts until Al Franken won.


55 posted on 10/25/2012 7:45:53 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: chimera
I thought Coleman lost to Frankenputz.

Yes, but only after that phony, fraudulent multiple recount conducted under the auspices of the 'Rat Secretary of State. But Coleman was the incumbent; he had been elected to the US Senate six years before that.

And yes, there was at least one other GOP US Senator in the 1980s: Rudy Boschwitz.

56 posted on 10/25/2012 8:33:10 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

I understand that occasionally they go for ‘Pub candidates at the state level. I’m just saying that the recent electoral history of MN does not indicate a lot of support for ‘Pub presidential candidates, and that makes a win by R&R a long shot. That does not mean that they shouldn’t try or that people inclined to vote for them should not do so, because in politics those are the only things we can do.


57 posted on 10/26/2012 6:11:15 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping and for sharing your insights, dear justiceseeker93!


58 posted on 10/26/2012 9:01:54 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
The Romney name is big among two groups here.

1. Seniors. George was governor from 63-69. People in their 50's or older remember George. People born in 1945 and earlier had the chance to vote for George. That's important, because there's a large senior population here, and seniors here are more democrat than elsewhere because of unions.

2. Oakland County. That's Mitt's old stomping ground. The family is known there.

Will that make a difference? Maybe.

59 posted on 10/26/2012 9:04:19 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Holding my nose one more time to get rid of Eric Holder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson