Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order -- Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council
The White House ^ | 10/26/2012 | Obama

Posted on 10/27/2012 4:07:51 AM PDT by ebshumidors

For Immediate Release October 26, 2012 Executive Order -- Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council

EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - ESTABLISHING THE WHITE HOUSE HOMELAND SECURITY PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to advance the Federal Government's use of local partnerships to address homeland security challenges, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. The purpose of this order is to maximize the Federal Government's ability to develop local partnerships in the United States to support homeland security priorities. Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals, structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are mutually determined. Collaboration enables the Federal Government and its partners to use resources more efficiently, build on one another's expertise, drive innovation, engage in collective action, broaden investments to achieve shared goals, and improve performance. Partnerships enhance our ability to address homeland security priorities, from responding to natural disasters to preventing terrorism, by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and resources.

The National Security Strategy emphasizes the importance of partnerships, underscoring that to keep our Nation safe "we must tap the ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships with the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and community-based organizations. Such partnerships are critical to U.S. success at home and abroad, and we will support them through enhanced opportunities for engagement, coordination, transparency, and information sharing." This approach recognizes that, given the complexities and range of challenges, we must institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats to the United States.

Sec. 2. White House Homeland Security Partnership Council and Steering Committee.

(a) White House Homeland Security Partnership Council. There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships -- between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement -- to address homeland security challenges. The Council shall be chaired by the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism (Chair), or a designee from the National Security Staff.

(b) Council Membership.

(i) Pursuant to the nomination process established in subsection (b)(ii) of this section, the Council shall be composed of Federal officials who are from field offices of the executive departments, agencies, and bureaus (agencies) that are members of the Steering Committee established in subsection (c) of this section, and who have demonstrated an ability to develop, sustain, and institutionalize local partnerships to address policy priorities.

(ii) The nomination process and selection criteria for members of the Council shall be established by the Steering Committee. Based on those criteria, agency heads may select and present to the Steering Committee their nominee or nominees to represent them on the Council. The Steering Committee shall consider all of the nominees and decide by consensus which of the nominees shall participate on the Council. Each member agency on the Steering Committee, with the exception of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, may have at least one representative on the Council.

(c) Steering Committee. There is also established a Steering Committee, chaired by the Chair of the Council, to provide guidance to the Council and perform other functions as set forth in this order. The Steering Committee shall include a representative at the Deputy agency head level, or that representative's designee, from the following agencies:

(i) Department of State;

(ii) Department of the Treasury;

(iii) Department of Defense;

(iv) Department of Justice;

(v) Department of the Interior;

(vi) Department of Agriculture;

(vii) Department of Commerce;

(viii) Department of Labor;

(ix) Department of Health and Human Services;

(x) Department of Housing and Urban Development;

(xi) Department of Transportation;

(xii) Department of Energy;

(xiii) Department of Education;

(xiv) Department of Veterans Affairs;

(xv) Department of Homeland Security;

(xvi) Office of the Director of National Intelligence;

(xvii) Environmental Protection Agency;

(xviii) Small Business Administration; and

(xix) Federal Bureau of Investigation.

At the invitation of the Chair, representatives of agencies not listed in subsection (c) of this section or other executive branch entities may attend and participate in Steering Committee meetings as appropriate.

(d) Administration. The Chair or a designee shall convene meetings of the Council and Steering Committee, determine their agendas, and coordinate their work. The Council may establish subgroups consisting exclusively of Council members or their designees, as appropriate.

Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee. (a) The Council shall, consistent with guidance from the Steering Committee:

(i) advise the Chair and Steering Committee members on priorities, challenges, and opportunities for local partnerships to support homeland security priorities, as well as regularly report to the Steering Committee on the Council's efforts;

(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders;

(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local homeland security partnerships;

(iv) raise awareness of local partnership best practices that can support homeland security priorities;

(v) as appropriate, conduct outreach to representatives of the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement entities with relevant expertise for local homeland security partnerships, and collaborate with other Federal Government bodies; and

(vi) convene an annual meeting to exchange key findings, progress, and best practices.

(b) The Steering Committee shall:

(i) determine the scope of issue areas the Council will address and its operating protocols, in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget;

(ii) establish the nomination process and selection criteria for members of the Council as set forth in section 2(b)(ii) of this order;

(iii) provide guidance to the Council on the activities set forth in subsection (a) of this section; and

(iv) within 1 year of the selection of the Council members, and annually thereafter, provide a report on the work of the Council to the President through the Chair.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) The heads of agencies participating in the Steering Committee shall assist and provide information to the Council, consistent with applicable law, as may be necessary to implement this order. Each agency shall bear its own expense for participating in the Council.

(b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof;

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals; or

(iii) the functions of the Overseas Security Advisory Council.

(c) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and appropriate protections for privacy and civil liberties, and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE, October 26, 2012.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: civilianarmy; dhs; enemyofthepeople; executiveorder; executiveorders; federalgovernment; homelandsecurity; marxistcoup; obama; obamunism; privatecitizens; sorosorgs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
More co-opting of the locals.
1 posted on 10/27/2012 4:08:06 AM PDT by ebshumidors
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
"This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, "

Says it all - it's a power grab.

2 posted on 10/27/2012 4:11:30 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Our tax dollars being used against us for thier devious agenda


3 posted on 10/27/2012 4:14:47 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (bb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

What this order “does,” in fact, is open up the legitimization of agencies, say ACORN or its successor, the NAACP, the NBPP, or other ‘community-interested’ group as a member of the council - by ‘invitation of the chair’...

It is simply a way to give government power to fringe groups in any situation the “chair” deems necessary. The ‘chair’ being and Obama lackey.

Taken to extreme, it is the instantiation of Obama’s 2008 promise “....to have a civilian defense force, as well staffed, well funded as the Defense Department.....” [paraphrased]


4 posted on 10/27/2012 4:17:40 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Preparing for Frankenstorm?


5 posted on 10/27/2012 4:19:53 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

This order does not .... protect a citizen and his rights, but DOES give every facet of government more flexability in denying the citizen and his rights.


6 posted on 10/27/2012 4:21:28 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
Yeah, these "partnerships" typically involve federal agents contacting and coopting local sheriff departments into doing their dirty work for them.

Notice that every time the Secret Service, TSA, etc shows up to bully and threaten private citizens, they always drag some hapless deputy or city cop along to serve as muscle.

Seems like Sheriff Joe Arpaio is the only one in the country who has the cojones to tell them to go to hell.

7 posted on 10/27/2012 4:24:21 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I forget the exact words, but I vaguely remember he included “armed” as well.


8 posted on 10/27/2012 4:28:35 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Of course...you’re correct...forgot that ‘little’ detail.

Hmm.....do you suppose that could be the billion-plus rounds of ammo these innocuous agencies have bought recently for “proficiency training?”


9 posted on 10/27/2012 4:31:52 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Just in time for the 2012 elections?


10 posted on 10/27/2012 4:45:38 AM PDT by Leep (Are you smarter than a 7th grade math student and or Barack 0bama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
"Hmm.....do you suppose that could be the billion-plus rounds of ammo these innocuous agencies have bought recently for “proficiency training?”

That was the first thing I thought after reading this.

11 posted on 10/27/2012 4:47:40 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors; mickie
Will the Federal government's "local partnerships" include the local Black Panther organization?

Why not? (See Sec. 2 - A.)

Leni

12 posted on 10/27/2012 4:57:27 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

             

13 posted on 10/27/2012 5:00:06 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Something else for President Romney to undo.

He and his crew are going to be very busy unMarxing our country. Lots of work to do.


14 posted on 10/27/2012 5:09:34 AM PDT by upchuck (Barack Obama has become a joke. The only problem is that it's not funny. ~ William L. Gensert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

KGB..using 911 against citizens..i am beginning to think the Democrat party was behind 911. thier core is anti USA


15 posted on 10/27/2012 5:09:59 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Just another Stalinesque consolidation of power.

Nothing to see here, move along.

16 posted on 10/27/2012 5:19:21 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (All Y'all White Peoples is racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
Logic follows this report at Freep from January:
17 posted on 10/27/2012 5:21:17 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

WHY IS IT THAT BILLIONS OF ROUNDS OF HOLLOW POINT AMMO HAVE BEEN PURCHASED AND SENT TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE GROUPS MENTIONED IN THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL DICTATORIAL ORDER?

LLS


18 posted on 10/27/2012 5:23:06 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Legitimizing and giving authority to the “civilian army”...Chosen by the King.


19 posted on 10/27/2012 5:26:13 AM PDT by Shady (Hey, King Bozo Osmocote....you can't hide the truth anymore..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

To wit “possession is nine-tenths of the law.”


20 posted on 10/27/2012 5:31:43 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
OK guys .. let's get our act together.

There is only one 911 ... last month was Benghazi.

Where IS that tree, anyway?

21 posted on 10/27/2012 5:32:46 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Just what we need — another ‘committee’ to make things work better.

Look at how well the ‘committee’ concept worked among the POTUS/WH Situation room, CIA, State Department, et al, during the immediate hours of the Benghazi attack.

[/s]


22 posted on 10/27/2012 5:33:59 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Alas, the big bird having been severely beaten and lacerated was unable to fly and never got off the ground.

The jobless developers of the flightless bird wallowed in liberal serenity as they left the executive office building trooping into oblivion and desperation


23 posted on 10/27/2012 5:38:38 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

ok ..9/11/2012


24 posted on 10/27/2012 5:38:41 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: knarf

ok ..9/11/2012...they thought it would get support for obama. Biden kept saying “come on folks , this should pull us together”..this may have been his scheme.he is just that goofey


25 posted on 10/27/2012 5:40:05 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

I see the order misspelled “Partisanship.”


26 posted on 10/27/2012 5:46:48 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
If I yell,

DON'T SAY FIRE IN A THEATER

Which word will your brain pick up on and remember ?

27 posted on 10/27/2012 5:47:47 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

What does it cost??

I thought so, we cant afford it.


28 posted on 10/27/2012 5:47:47 AM PDT by Gasshog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Something else for President Romney to undo.

He could do worse than issue an EO on the limo ride back to the WH after the swearing-in repealing all EOs issued since 1/21/09.

29 posted on 10/27/2012 5:51:18 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
"Our tax dollars being used against us for their devious agenda."

Absolutely correct.

(Minor detail....re: this Executive Order......doesn't the expenditure of tax dollars rest in the authority of Congress, not the Oval Orfice?)

Leni

30 posted on 10/27/2012 5:53:36 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

Ha! I like it. It would make a great shoulder patch for the coming revolt.


31 posted on 10/27/2012 5:56:14 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
.....doesn't the expenditure of tax dollars rest in the authority of Congress...

All taxes originate in Congress. How they're spent is usually decided in the Federal Budget, which can be submitted by the President or anyone in Congress to voted upon by the Congress. We've just not had a Budget voted out of Congress and signed by this President since his election. The Fed's been funded by a string of Continuing Resolutions since his election. Not sure how the debt ceiling deal played into all this, but I don't think that was considered a proper fiscal year budget.

32 posted on 10/27/2012 6:13:11 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; knarf; ronnie raygun

I expect the most they’ll ever actually accomplish is hold meetings, publish reams of regulations, and issue pamphlets. Unless, of course, something actually happens and then they’ll shift into blame mode.


33 posted on 10/27/2012 6:23:07 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

An armed ACORN coming to a neighborhood near you. What could possibly go wrong with that lol


34 posted on 10/27/2012 6:23:56 AM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
My first thought is “For gosh sake, not another one!” It seems to me, after a cursory reading, that there is an awful lot of overlap to these EOs. I'm wondering if that isn't a strategy in itself.
35 posted on 10/27/2012 6:26:06 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Gives the Federal Government a mechanism to do an end run around the states, and work directly at the local level. It wouldn’t have anything to do with all those state governments going R in 2010, I’m sure...


36 posted on 10/27/2012 6:30:14 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Government actions ALWAYS have unintended consequences...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

I posted a copy of the order on my FB page, and added a para-phrasing of some of the Freeper comments.

When I went back to add something else in the comments section, my entire post was gone.

I just reposted it again.

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, however......


37 posted on 10/27/2012 6:46:13 AM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
...we must institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats to the United States.

They can't be referring to the latin invasion since that seems to just okey-dokey with the elites. Or the islamic infection. Or the urban gorilla gangs, that's just diversity in the streets.

It must have to do with those terrible TEA Party types, and the murderous ex-military members. Those contemptible Constitution-quoters... "Are you serious? Are you serious?"

38 posted on 10/27/2012 6:47:00 AM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

OK, just went back to check on it, and it’s gone again.

Are you not allowed to post a link to things on the White House’s web site?

Very weird...


39 posted on 10/27/2012 6:48:54 AM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Never mind, I found it.

I guess I still don’t know how to use FB properly (even though I’ve been on it for years...)

“Pardon the interruption...”


40 posted on 10/27/2012 6:51:25 AM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

My colleagues (most) are skeptical but I keep telling them that the fed is going to “federalize” all police one day under the guise of DHS and FEMA.

I believe they saw how many cops volunteered to help out with 9/11 and Katrina and thought, wow, look at this Rapid Reaction Force, all set to go.

It’s already going on with task forces and “light infantry” counter terrorism training that thousands of rank and file police are getting.


41 posted on 10/27/2012 6:56:08 AM PDT by Molon Labbie (Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Are you getting any responses to it on FB, BV?


42 posted on 10/27/2012 7:00:35 AM PDT by SouthernClaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
I expect the most they’ll ever actually accomplish is hold meetings, publish reams of regulations, and issue pamphlets.

And collect info to add to their files on "dissidents". Remember the enormous new intelligence center the feds built in Utah?

A tyrannical government doesn't have to beat, jail or shoot people these days. They can harass and beggar them to death with the use of federal agencies. They can utterly ruin anyone they care to.

That new house you're building? It probably sits on a "wetland" and you don't even know it.

Or, surprise! The IT department found child porn on your work computer. (now where do you suppose that came from?)

43 posted on 10/27/2012 7:05:32 AM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

Pure Soviet style KGB stuff this is. We must ask the local party man what he/she,it thinks first comrades.


44 posted on 10/27/2012 7:43:03 AM PDT by Snuph ("give me Liberty...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thank ebshumidors.


45 posted on 10/27/2012 8:00:43 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
!!!
46 posted on 10/27/2012 8:45:56 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors; hedgetrimmer
(a) White House Homeland Security Partnership Council. There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships -- between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement -- to address homeland security challenges. The Council shall be chaired by the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism (Chair), or a designee from the National Security Staff.

Since when did the likes of the Sierra Club or The Nature Conservancy gain direct access by which to wield police powers?

Since now.

This is bad, really bad.

47 posted on 10/27/2012 9:05:54 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
The word budget is mentioned often, if they add funding to the powers -extra bad. Especially, when you take into consideration DHS classifications of who are potential terrorist and their hands off policies with illegals.

Also potential for - tell on your neighbor- and promote propaganda.

48 posted on 10/27/2012 9:51:01 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
The word budget is mentioned often, if they add funding to the powers -extra bad. Especially, when you take into consideration DHS classifications of who are potential terrorist and their hands off policies with illegals.

Welcome to the words, "Environmental Terrorism."

49 posted on 10/27/2012 9:54:07 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

We shouldn’t worry about whether the professional pollers are oversampling the Democrats. They are clearly undersampling the foreign nationals, the dead, and the non-existent.


50 posted on 10/27/2012 9:59:38 AM PDT by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson