Skip to comments.Rasmussen Daily: SAT 10/27: R:50 O:46 Obama -10%
Posted on 10/27/2012 6:33:08 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
click here to read article
>> Romney doesn’t have leads anything close to 58-42 in the states he is winning <<
I don’t necessarily dispute your point. Maybe the leads aren’t there. I just don’t know, because I haven’t bothered to dig up the latest survey data for each of the eleven states in question. But in my previous post, I just wanted to make the point that it’s not at all difficult to generate a set of numbers replicating Rasmussen’s bottom line.
In any case, if we assume truthfulness and reliability for Rasmussen’s methodology, there clearly has to be SOME combination of swing-state averages that will give Romney a six point advantage.
Therefore, if some energetic FReeper (not me!) has the time to dig thru all the data and run umpteen simulations, I’m pretty confident that he could discover a reasonable scenario to answer your original question, i.e., whether anybody can figure out a way to duplicate Rasmussen’s findings.
“....So it ain’t far fetched the female species really DOES take after Eve’s DNA....bunch of stupid idiots!...”
Now you know why the Founding Fathers never let them vote.
It wasn’t because they didn’t love their women. It’s because they knew they would vote their “emotions” rather than the issues. Of course, not all of em are like that in this modern era, but it generally runs true in the mentally-deranged liberal camp for sure.
The problem is dependency on government. Married women are usually conservative. But liberals figured out how to make single women dependent on government by replacing traditional marriage with the acceptance of promiscuity.
“A lot of Conservatives are habitual Eeyore’s they assume that they will lose even when they are winning. Leftists live in a emotional bubble world. They figure because they feel something it is true.”
We overanalyze everything. What if this happens, what if that happens?