Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlatherNaut

This article is infuriating to read. It is clearly an attempt to make it appear that they’re covering the new claims when in reality they glossed over everything. Like the fact that the position of the enemy firing on the CIA annex was painted by a laser so that air support could hit them. There were 2 drones, and it’s been reported that one of them was armed. If so, then this isn’t about Libyan airspace being at issue or help not being available - it is an issue of the help that was already there being specifically told it COULD NOT provide support. A drone was given the exact place to hit and was specifically told not to do so - instead allowing that target to hit and kill the former SEALs.

This is inexcusable, and for this article to ignore the substance of what was revealed yesterday stinks to high heaven.


16 posted on 10/27/2012 8:10:22 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Good point. We were already in their airspace.


31 posted on 10/27/2012 9:45:28 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson