Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential race tied in Ohio newspaper poll (R49 O49); 1015 LV (D+3 sample) 10/18-10/23
canton repository ^ | 10/27/12 | Heldenfels

Posted on 10/27/2012 9:06:41 PM PDT by Ravi

The poll results are in. With less than two weeks until the election, Ohioans as a whole, you have made your selection for president: You want Barack Obama AND Mitt Romney.

Your love for each is equal, according to results of the most recent Ohio Newspaper Poll of likely voters. It’s Obama 49 percent and Romney 49 percent. One percent of you prefer someone else and the other 1 percent still aren’t sure who you will vote for on Election Day.

The poll, taken between Oct. 18 and Monday, was sponsored by the eight largest circulating newspapers in Ohio, which includes The Repository. It was conducted by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati.

(Excerpt) Read more at cantonrep.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; obama; ohio; romney; ryan
Boom!
1 posted on 10/27/2012 9:06:50 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; LS; LdSentinal; Perdogg; Jet Jaguar; SoftwareEngineer; tatown; HamiltonJay; plushaye

ping


2 posted on 10/27/2012 9:08:14 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Democrats oversampled by 3+.

Using Gallup’s corrected R+1 model, Romney is ahead in OH 50 to 48 plus 1% for the others.


3 posted on 10/27/2012 9:08:45 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved FrieGrnd Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Will this make it into Nate Silver’s state polls?


4 posted on 10/27/2012 9:09:36 PM PDT by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Is Gallup’s R+1 for OH or nationally?


5 posted on 10/27/2012 9:10:06 PM PDT by tatown (Obama was right, it was a 'one term proposition')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; LS; Perdogg; napscoordinator; God luvs America; nutmeg; SoFloFreeper; Ravi; ...

Poll Ping.


6 posted on 10/27/2012 9:10:25 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (The pundits have forgotten the 2010 elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; LS; LdSentinal; Perdogg; Jet Jaguar; SoftwareEngineer; tatown; HamiltonJay; plushaye

Slightly dem heavy poll. Romney was down 3 in their last poll. If I gently readjust poll and unskew it, Romney ahead? Yes or no? Confirms on the ground findings and absentee ballot totals. What am I missing?


7 posted on 10/27/2012 9:10:56 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Ha! +1


8 posted on 10/27/2012 9:12:10 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Thanks!


9 posted on 10/27/2012 9:12:38 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

In their last poll Obama was ahead.

Good news.

If you adjust for the slight skew and anticipate record GOP-Indy-dissafected Democrats TURNOUT, you have a Romney/Ryan OH win!


10 posted on 10/27/2012 9:16:52 PM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tatown

nationally. Also @numbersmuncher ie. Jordan from NRO says they pushed the indies to lean one way or the other in effect making the sample less dem heavy than it otherwise would have been.

So in effect this is more like a D+6 poll or worse if they hadn’t pushed the indies to say which way they are leaning. Indies were obviously leaning Romney so they upped the rep totals by calling these republican leaning indies republicans so we wouldn’t yell at them for undersampling republicans. Very tricky these guys. If they did correct labelling, they wouldn’t push indies one way or the other and leave them as independents supporting Romney.

True republicans and dems would have been left alone also. If they did this, this sample appears to be a D+6 sample or worse.

More good news.


11 posted on 10/27/2012 9:17:36 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Saw only 11% indy? Too low?

Good thing is R was down 5 in this poll in Sept. Trend is our friend.


12 posted on 10/27/2012 9:18:08 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

The necropolis vote???


13 posted on 10/27/2012 9:19:06 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Lol!


14 posted on 10/27/2012 9:21:19 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

I know OH is important, but we are obsessing too much. If R is up 4-5 in the major nationals, and up 15 with Indy’s, he is NOT going to lose the race.

Every OH poll has had R behind for months. Now this past week, we have 3 now that show it tied. And each with suspect D+ samples. My guess is we see some R in the lead OH polls by mid week.

And even the lefty PPP daily has R49-48 today for his first lead I believe. Winning Indy’s 16 in their poll. And O’s approval is -8.

Romney has been 50% for TWELVE straight in Gallup and 5 straight in RAS. O has not been at 50% in either EVER. And he is in the 45-47% range even in the polls that are tied or show him with slight lead.

Think big picture. This is breaking Romney big time. If Obama is suspending campaign rallies for a couple of days, he knows its over. Hurricane is a good excuse for him to take some more time off from his job.


15 posted on 10/27/2012 9:24:15 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ravi; All

Bizarrely low level of indies, just 10 percent. interesting....no data on where indies are breaking out though.

Good final result though.


16 posted on 10/27/2012 9:27:22 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

see 11


17 posted on 10/27/2012 9:29:20 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

That right there is infinite wisdom.


18 posted on 10/27/2012 9:29:59 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

True but all these threads being posted by certain members with headlines proclaiming huge early voting looking good for Obama is starting to get to me a little.


19 posted on 10/27/2012 9:30:44 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

I try to look at the PVI for each state which is a pretty good approximator, rather than focusing on the individual state polls....Ohio has a PVI of +1, so in effect, whatever Romney’s national vote total is, add 1 and that is what his total in Ohio should be...so taking the Ras poll today of 50-46, we are looking at 51-46 Romney in Ohio...Now, there are some variables here such as the unprecedented focus being placed on Ohio by Zero, however, the final national vote is fairly predictive of the Ohio vote...


20 posted on 10/27/2012 9:32:58 PM PDT by usafa92 (Conservative in Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

This poll has the same....big lead (no numbers given though) supposedly for O in early voting. I am just trying to think of 2010.....Dems were all excited with big early voting leads. Well, we all know that didn’t matter in the final result.


21 posted on 10/27/2012 9:34:11 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

See link below to new Byron York on state of the race from some campaign insiders.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/how-romney-sees-the-polls/article/2511912#.UIy2pYVbyI8


22 posted on 10/27/2012 9:41:56 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Double Boom. Romney is gaining at the perfect time in Ohio.
He has yet to peak.


23 posted on 10/27/2012 9:53:43 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Looks like the firewall is burning. The Trend be our Friend.

Pray for America


24 posted on 10/27/2012 9:57:37 PM PDT by bray (Islam- A billion medieval savages can't be wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

What is PVI?


25 posted on 10/27/2012 10:15:09 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

The pollsters said the same thing about Ohio in 2010. They said the early voting, and registrations favored the Democrats. They were wrong.

Kasich won the governorship.

Ohio Senate: No Republican incumbents lost , while 2 Democratic incumbents lost.

Ohio House of Representatives: No Republican incumbents lost, while 11 incumbent Democratic incumbent lost.


26 posted on 10/27/2012 10:16:10 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Found it... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cook_Partisan_Voting_Index


27 posted on 10/27/2012 10:20:41 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

Correct. Romney up 5 means he wins NH, NV, CO, IA, and probably WI. I dont think he’ll need Ohio ... but he’ll get it.
Ohio has voted within 1-2% of the popular vote for the last 4 or 5 elections.


28 posted on 10/27/2012 10:39:07 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole America’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I so like the way you put it...Ohio has voted with the rest of the country in the past, within a very close range.

The way so many nervous Nellies and concern trolls put it, Ohio is determinative of how the country goes. Because somehow its electoral votes are gonna decide the whole election and we’ve got to be afraid that OH is going the wrong way from America.

Au contraire - your stated way is the correct one - OH mirrors the nation, it does not control it.


29 posted on 10/28/2012 4:28:32 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gswilder
At some point these pollsters had to begin looking ar REAL percentages as seen in our absentee #s and the early vote reports. These simply didn't jibe with the polls, but these were indisputable indicators. Now, it could have been argued that a lot of Rs were going to vote D--- but even " Crazy Nate Silver" doesn't' believe that.

These guys must feel like th British at Isandlwana when the whole Zulu army started coming over the hill. "that's all of them, right?"

No, that's just the vanguard!

30 posted on 10/28/2012 4:33:12 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

And the other thing these nervous types do - they confuse POLLs a couple of weeks, or one week, OUT from vote counting day, with the final ELECTION RESULT.

When we know that polls not only can, and do, NATURALLY change to reflect closing trends, but also that the pollsters change their assumptions as THE DAY nears.

They are trying to be close to RIGHT, because that represents their track record and is money - or not - in the bank next time.

So, rule of thumb, do not confuse polling a week or two out with final results.

You have it.

Wish (sigh) more on our side did.


31 posted on 10/28/2012 4:37:54 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Adrian Gray has addressed those claims-—actually, I spoke with him last week. Ds were cherry picking one county where they had a lead, and ignored many others, especially the bell weather counties which showed slight R leads. Again, we don’t even need to win early vote, just not lose huge. Gary’s numbers show that already, before Election Day we have eliminated almost all of the D early vote advantage so far.


32 posted on 10/28/2012 4:40:29 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gswilder
Just a few days ago, I heard indirectly/second hand from 3 sources in the R camp that OH then was "even" and an inside poll of Josh Mandell had just shown sharp movement our way across the board.

So I suspect this public poll, as always, is a lagging indicator and that R is up 1-2 (a private pollster told me R+2) and that on Election Day the final shift of Indies will make it +3 or +4--I don't see it being higher than 4.5 even if the national poll is higher.

33 posted on 10/28/2012 4:51:19 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

I think there’s another interesting point to be made here ... the impact of early voting on polls.

My understanding is that when someone called for a poll indicates that they’ve already voted, they’re automatically placed in the likely voter category ... skipping all the likely voter filters.

So given that there’s early voting in OH, and the conventional wisdom that significantly more Obama supporters are taking advantage of early voting (I was up in Cincy and Dayton yesterday and over the course of channel surfing on the radio I heard multiple pro-Obama ads talking up early voting. But no Romney ones).

Now I know that there’s been some discussion about whether the “Dems and Dem-leaning independents vote early” CW is correct or not, but if it is then this would mean that this poll is probably even further skewed pro-Obama than the couple/few points on party ID, right? Because Republicans and GOP-leaners have to clear a higher hurdle (getting past the likely voter screen) than Obama voters do ...


34 posted on 10/28/2012 4:58:49 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi


35 posted on 10/28/2012 5:47:25 AM PDT by devolve ( ---- ---- ---- -CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER- ---- ---- ---- ---- John Belusi ---- ----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi; LS; LdSentinal; Perdogg; Jet Jaguar; SoftwareEngineer; tatown; HamiltonJay; plushaye; ...

As Ravi mentioned above, if you “gently unskew” this poll (Ravi, you have won the best use of the English language award for that phrase!), you get maybe a 51-49 or 52-48 poll in favor of the Governor.

Based on Ravi’s spreadsheet updates or LS’s on the ground reports, I do believe that is how Ohio will end up

My prediction is that the Governor wins nationally at 53-47 (give or take) but Ohio is a point or two closer, let us say 51-49 or so.

So, in that sense Ohio will underperform for the Republicans compared to national totals but the Governor will still pull it out and we will get a minimum 2 point victory in OH

However, I must say, that I feel that we will take IA, WI, NH and CO and thus OH may not be pivotal at all

10 more days and we will find out if I am drinking the Kool Aid or not :-)


36 posted on 10/28/2012 6:00:41 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Ohio has always reflected the country. That’s why it consistently keeps picking the winner. If Romney is up in the national polls, he is up in Ohio.


37 posted on 10/28/2012 6:13:32 AM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Rarely does a GOP candidate underperforms in OH.


38 posted on 10/28/2012 6:17:07 AM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Per the writeup in the Akron Beacon Journal, this is a D +6 poll, not D +3. The breakdown is D 48, R 42, Independents 10. The PREVIOUS (September) poll has D +3 (D 47, R 44, I 10). In that previous D +3 poll, it was O 51 - R 46. Now it is 49-49. Romney leads on who better handles the economy (51-45) and enthusiasm (54-45). Given the D+6 skew, the poll is enormously encouraging.


39 posted on 10/28/2012 6:28:42 AM PDT by Marco Aurelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
I agree that OH comes in .5-1 point below national . . . however, that's all still based on spin.

IF the Ds are (as some think) cannibalizing their election day voters to pump up early voting, then the Rs will add to the lead more on election day.

One thing absentee voting does is bring out the party faithful who will be out of town, so their votes wouldn't change.

But one of the serious deficiencies of "early voting" is that when something big, such as Benghazi, happens in the last couple of weeks before the election, "early voters" may have had a change of heart . . . but too late. Course, that can cut both ways.

40 posted on 10/28/2012 6:57:29 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
"True but all these threads being posted by certain members with headlines proclaiming huge early voting looking good for Obama is starting to get to me a little."

Then don't give them what they want...

Feel free to quote this instead...

Natl Bush 2000 47.9% 50,456,002 48.4% 50,999,897
Ohio Bush 2000 50% 2,351,209 46.5% 2,186,190
Natl Bush 2004 50.7% 62,040,610 48.3% 59,028,444
Ohio Bush 2004 50.8% 2,858,727 48.7% 2,739,952
Natl Bobo 2008 52.9% 69,456,897 45.7% 59,934,814
Ohio Bobo 2008 51.5% 2,940,044 46.9% 2,677,820

In Ohio, the GOP candidate consistently receives votes equal to, or greater than, his National popular vote.

< / argument >
41 posted on 10/28/2012 7:07:15 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS
"No, that's just the vanguard..."

42 posted on 10/28/2012 7:13:37 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


If you agree, please click the "Like"

43 posted on 10/28/2012 9:46:52 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=om93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Partisan Voting Index


44 posted on 10/29/2012 8:34:11 PM PDT by usafa92 (Conservative in Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson