Skip to comments.Obama's Taqqiya Unravels
Posted on 10/28/2012 6:25:21 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
I have never entertained the idea that Obama was a Muslim and always believed he was a socialist. But Obama's behavior over the last four years regarding Islam has convinced me that Obama has a Socialist/Islamic centered worldview -- a combination that is not uncommon in many parts of the Muslim world.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
It's easily possible that Zer0 has been unfit since b4 he was immaculated.
Just consider his stated views of the US Constitution.
Sounds like H! is well on her way to being a muzzie.
Taqqiya(lieing) is a good word.. I have yet to hear Obama speak any truth..
MAybe he does not know any truth..
Not only Obama but any democrat.. seems they compete on who tells the biggest whoppers..
They make an art form out of telling lies, like the Soviets did/DO..
To them the truth is whatever they say is the truth..
Theres something filthy, dirty about that..
To them “dirty tricks” are NORMAL.. natural..
Remember that next time you talk to a Union member..
They are mostly ALL democrats..
Why do muslims need USA help when they have Allah?
I just visited the web sites of CNN, ABC, CBS, ABC. Only CBS had any sort of story about Libya. It was was about Witnesses saying it was an organized attack. All the other sites had very prominent stories favorable to Obama. None favorable to Romney. Several unfavorable to Romney.One had a story about how the presidency had affected Obama's faith.
Muslims can’t make it in the modern world because of their primitive religion, so naturally, they feel entitled to stealing wealth from the “infidels” who somehow have managed to invent and develop every innovation in the present economy.
Muslims are the cowbirds who invade other birds’ nests, destroy their eggs, and lay their own eggs in the ravaged nest. Then they fly off and let the unwitting mother birds hatch the Cowbird eggs and feed the next generation of the enemy. Life is not fair.
Because Allah is capricious.
The thing I have trouble understanding is how did anyone ever think he WAS fit to be president. Okay, if a person is admittedly mentally handicapped that is different but anyone with an IQ above 90 should have known better.
The problem with that is the president has been busily murdering Muslims from drones for four years. Further, although belatedly and only after much dithering and with ridiculous rules of engagement, he committed to a surge in Afghanistan. The author fails to explain these discrepancies except to say in effect that the crypto Muslim is actually a secular fundamentalist Muslim.
One who is sometimes guided by sharia law and sometimes not. I am willing to accept that Obama has Muslim sympathies, it is even conceivable that he is a closet Muslim, however, any argument that he simply will not countenance the killing of Muslims does not wash. Therefore the author comes up with some halfway explanation:
According to Sharia, it is a capital crime for a Muslim individual or leader to shoot at fellow Muslims -- even Islamists -- for the purpose of protecting Americans. That would make Obama a violator of Sharia and an apostate. If Obama considers himself a Muslim and wears an Islamic ring, then he must have had a very hard time deciding on how to protect the consulate without killing Muslim attackers. His solution? Settling for the lesser of two evils: getting Muslims, in the form of Libyan security, to guard the property and in this way, forcing Muslims to shoot other Muslims in order to defend the consulate.
The author would have us believe that Obama is a Muslim of convenience which is I suppose possible if there is a specie which the author describes as follows:
Obama has a Socialist/Islamic centered worldview -- a combination that is not uncommon in many parts of the Muslim world.
I suppose this means that Obama is a secular Muslim with some inclination toward sharia but with a secular worldview and an elastic Islamic conscience.
"If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected . . . First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences . . . Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people . . . People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam. "
Even if Islamist societies wanted to cooperate it would take a couple of generations after outlawing inbreeding and stopping the hateful Islamist indoctrination in the schools to settle things down.
Not all Islamist nutcases are the result of inbreeding.. some benefit from their positions and use the unfortunate to advance the life of 72 virgins and great wealth here on Earth.
There is no question in my mind -- I've worked with Muslims and lived in Ankara for almost a year -- that there is a difference between Muslim and Islamist.
Opponents of the Islamist AK Party (from 3 or 4 years ago.. things may be getting more hopeless)
possible ---> provable.
All I can say in my defense is I got up too early and didn't have enough coffee.
>> One who is sometimes guided by sharia law and sometimes not.