Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Here is some more interesting “stuff”....

This was a reply on another site that raised a Very Plausible scenario ———

“It is now known that Congress knew Obama has been trying to figure out how to release the blind sheik in US prison to the MB in Egypt. To make his release acceptable to the American public and to clinch the election, Obama had to create an October Surprise hostage exchange - Stevens for the sheik. To help the MB capture Stevens, Obama had to remove all security from Stevens, lest a fight break out and Stevens gets himself killed. But the two ex-seals that came to Stevens’ aid did put up a fight. After hours of trying to capture Stevens alive, the terrorists finally decided to end it and kill them all.

From sources such as a 20 year CIA veteran interviewed by Glenn Beck, we know that it is entirely unreasonable to believe Obama didn’t know minutes from the events beginning to unfold - that everyone knew from the start - Hillary, Obama, Petreaus, Panetta, etc. We now know that the ex-seals were told to stand down (allow capture?), that the CIA was told to stand down, and that any rescue mission being considered came (intentionally?) too late.

Do you see where this is going? Obama wanted no resistance. He wanted Stevens captured alive.
To hide the WH-MB link, Obama began to push the video as the reason for Stevens’ death. But when the lie wouldn’t hold any longer, Biden said that Obama and Biden never knew that Stevens’ was lacking security, only to find now that this is too incredible to believe.
The press continues to ask, “What did Obama know and when did he know it?”, and are refusing to ask the real question, “Why was Stevens’ request for security repeatedly intentionally denied, and why did the Obama administration refuse to launch any rescue operation?”


13 posted on 10/28/2012 1:07:28 PM PDT by lgjhn23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lgjhn23

Releasing the sheik makes Obama look weak. Having an ambassador taken hostage makes Obama look weak. Trading the sheik for the ambassador makes Obama look weak.

None of it is good for Obama. I can understand him wanting to appease the Muslim Brotherhood, but only after the election.

State and Defense didn’t want their pet Libyan government look weak in the eyes of the Islamists by sending in a military response with or without their permission. There likely is an American-backed gun running operation from to the Syrian rebels.

I have an strong aversion to conspiracy theories - the only thing that makes me wonder what more is going is the reduced security for Stevens’ trip, and that really is a red flag.

But human stupidity, cupidity and wickedness accounts for so much without deep and complicated plots.


17 posted on 10/28/2012 2:30:11 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson