Skip to comments.Beyond Impeachment: Obama Treasonous over Benghazi
Posted on 10/29/2012 12:17:48 AM PDT by Snuph
Is it treason when you put your own reelection above the good of your country and the lives of its citizens? If so, Barack Obama committed treason in leaving the four Americans to die in Benghazi.
Our Constitution defines it this way: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Aid and comfort to the enemy what is that?
When you ascribe an action to the protest of a video when it is actuality a planned terror attack by Ansar al-Shariah, an established offshoot of al-Qaeda (if thats not your enemy, then who) and you knew that all along, you watched it live without doing anything, and then you told those who wanted to help to stand down? Meanwhile, our government may have been conspiring to arm another offshoot of al-Qaeda in Syria.
How much more treasonous can you get? Benedict Arnold was a piker.
Indeed, the discussion of Benghazi has just begun. And dont be surprised if the conversation escalates from impeachment to treason very quickly. In fact, if Obama wins reelection you can bet on it. The cries of treason will be unstoppable. Not even if the mainstream media will be able to deny them.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
I’m at the point now where I seriously believe 0 is an alQaeda operative, that his insertion into American politics and into the White House was a long-shot plan that’s paying off big-time for his team.
And we thought Clinton was the Manchurian Candidate!!!
It's just a movie, or at least I keep telling myself that. I don't believe it is possible to convict Obama of treason without inside testimony, and we've seen that the Dems will close ranks around their own even if there is DNA evidence to the contrary. All we can do is hope to remove Obama from office eight days from now, and hope that the crippling $6T of debt he facilitated and his destructive laws are recoverable actions, whether they were innocent errors or intentional harm.
Trying Islamic terrorists in civil courts (Sparing them from more brutal military courts)
Ft. Hood as workplace violence
Stripping counter-terrorism manuals of references to Islam
Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan which INCREASED RISK TO AMERICAN SOLDIERS (70% of American Soldier fatalities in Afghanistan occurred SINCE 0BAMA TOOK OFFICE)
Benghazi (Security draw-down before attack and no military response after terrorist attack. Blames American film maker (YouTube video) instead of Islamic terrorists, following attack)
0bama's long-standing failure to speak the words 'terrorist attack' 'terrorist act' and 'war on terror' ('Act of terror' doesn't cut it!!)
0bama quote: "The future does not belong to those who insult the Prophet Mohammed" -- United Nations assembly 2012
DOES ANYONE SEE A PATTERN HERE???
Rather than retrieve or destroy our drone lost to Iran, 0bama chose instead to let them have it
0bama failed to act on the release of the Lockerbie bomber. He just watched this murderer go free and did nothing to alter that event (Remember how the 'cops acted stupidly', however?)
More: Stopped wearing his ring and watch. Muzlims don’t wear jewelry during ramadamadingdong.
So the death of an ambassador trumps the death of border patrol agent Brian Terry?
Despite my aversion, the branding of treason is not acceptable at this point.
The force of justice should be immediately directed at those that demand the special protection of the 1st Amendment in the context of the press; yet, abuse the privilege for the purpose obstructing the fair use and trust of the same amendment. Basically, the press is abusing its power and should be held accountable.
Actually 0coward left 41 people to die and 37 got lucky that two former SEALs were ready to give their lives to save them along with a few other brave men who fortunately did not pay that price.
I believe this was to be the October surprise, a sting operation. Stevens was going to be kidnapped and Obumbler was going to show his chops by negotiating a solution. That explains why there were no assets to respond and when they were requested the high command was silent. They were letting the scheme play out. The administration has been covering it up ever since.
Read my tag line.
Who/where are those 30+ people? Hear/see anything of them?
I have a question. This attack was on the embassy. Several reasons have been put forth as to why, BUT, the terrorists were firing on the annex with a gun that C Herradge said had a plate that has to be set in the daylight in order to use the gun.
That means they prepared to fire on the annex at least during daylight hours before the attack on the embassy. How does that square up?
Also, how did all those people get to the annex and what finally made the attack on the annex to stop?