Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right-wing hysteria over Benghazi feeds upon itself
ajc ^ | 10/29/12 | Jay Bookman

Posted on 10/29/2012 4:17:22 PM PDT by Libloather

Right-wing hysteria over Benghazi feeds upon itself
4:25 pm October 29, 2012, by Jay Bookman

Fox New anchors, right-wing websites and talk-radio hosts around the country are ginning up a wave of mass hysteria about the decision by the Obama administration not to attempt a military rescue of Ambassador Chris Stevens in Libya. (Glenn Beck is even telling listeners that the treason is more widespread, and that Stevens was acting as a gunrunner for al Qaida in Libya and Syria. I kid you not.)

Obama’s crime is said to be so heinous that mere impeachment for refusing to intervene would be insufficient. If you Google the words “Benghazi” and “traitor,” you get some 518,000 hits, almost all of which cast President Obama as that traitor. The criticism extends as well to the mainstream media, which as my email informs me, is being accused of covering up a scandal of such dimensions that it would supposedly dwarf Watergate.

But I have a question.

According to NBC News, Mitt Romney hasn’t mentioned Libya in his campaign appearances around the country since Oct. 12, which is more than two weeks ago. Now why do you think that is?

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ajc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; hussein; hysteria; libya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last
Bookman wastes his time deflecting. Lots of comments at the link.
1 posted on 10/29/2012 4:17:22 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
the decision by the Obama administration not to attempt a military rescue

At least they're admitting Obama affirmatively declined to act.

2 posted on 10/29/2012 4:20:59 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The AJC is still in circulation?


3 posted on 10/29/2012 4:21:06 PM PDT by middlegeorgian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather

I’m of the opinion that the writers at the ajc AND the talking heads on local news are airheads-—absolute “oides”, that wouldn’t know how to wipe themselves if they didn’t have a crack to follow.


5 posted on 10/29/2012 4:22:24 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If Stevens was offed because the Russians had figured out that he was managing the CIA operation running weapons to Syria through Turkey, or because of his long relationship with the President and the knowledge that he is at least bisexual, then Zero would need him dead in either case, lest he be nabbed and forced to talk.

Should that news finally make it past the MSM spike, it then wouldn't be just "right wingers" who would be "hysterical."

6 posted on 10/29/2012 4:23:45 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
I’m of the opinion that the writers at the ajc AND the talking heads on local news are airheads-—absolute “oides”, that wouldn’t know how to wipe themselves if they didn’t have a crack to follow.

Their editors are not.

7 posted on 10/29/2012 4:24:50 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Way to give air to leftist propaganda.

8 posted on 10/29/2012 4:25:01 PM PDT by I see my hands (On the other hand.. dictators don't lose elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

When I think back on the Left-wing hysteria that fed upon itself to give us Watergate, it makes me so angry that they scoff at a sitting President not lifting a finger to do the job he is actually supposed to to do.


9 posted on 10/29/2012 4:25:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Jay is a long time leftist that never met a liberal idea he didn’t love or a conservative he didn’t hate. I imagine he still gets turned on when he pictures a Dennis Kucinich/Cynthia McKinney presidential ticket in his dreams .


10 posted on 10/29/2012 4:25:47 PM PDT by festusbanjo (Romney has run a business, a state, and an Olympics. Obama has never run anything but his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Jay Bookman - it is so painfully obvious that there is something terribly wrong with this administration’s reaction to the whole Benghazi tragedy - and so obvious that they sought to deceive the American people - that if you cannot at least admit that much debating you, or reading anything you have to say on the subject, is the worst kind of wasted time.


11 posted on 10/29/2012 4:26:47 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bookman is a complete stranger to the truth and the textbook definition of mendacity.


12 posted on 10/29/2012 4:26:54 PM PDT by Prov1322 (Enjoy my wife's incredible artwork at www.watercolorARTwork.com! (This space no longer for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
MSM Headline:

Big deal.. so they didn't get rescued.. people die everyday.
Rightwing Bigots Stir Mass Hysteria Over Nothing
"This is not a Hollywood movie."

or

MSM employees prove that they really are skid marks on Journalism's shorts.

13 posted on 10/29/2012 4:29:09 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

In response lot a Benghazi article in our local rag, I was surprised by all the liberal articles used to discount this cover up. Just like Vince Foster, Juanita Broderick , etc . . . .


14 posted on 10/29/2012 4:32:56 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think it is a little over the top to be using the words “impeachment” and “traitor” at this point. Let’s just make sure the American people know what happened here so they can vote this loser out of office.


15 posted on 10/29/2012 4:37:16 PM PDT by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzar
Bill Clinton -> Lewinski
Barry Obama -> Alinski

Carter -> Brzezinski
16 posted on 10/29/2012 4:37:46 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

There is a very simple litmus test to discover whether this is ginned-up “hysteria” or a cover-up on the part of the MSM-

How would this be covered if the C-I-C at the time was a Republican?

I think even this moron would have to acknowledge to himself, very differently than it’s being covered now with the Democrat Hussein at the helm.


17 posted on 10/29/2012 4:39:10 PM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Four men are dead.

It’s not ‘hysteria’.


18 posted on 10/29/2012 4:41:05 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Because the Obama administration is telling Romney and the old media this is a national security issue. OK. Then why are we overthrowing governments in Libya, Egypt and Syria? And save me the free the world speech. The Democrats wet their pants over our involvement in Nicaragua which was communists in our own back yard. This involvement in the Middle East doesn’t make sense......unless you read THE ILLINOIS PAY TO PLAY blog. Obama and Hillary are just grifters out to set the Middle East on fire so they, and their Democrat buddies can make money rebuilding. They are like arsonists who own the home furnishing store in town. They set fire to a house to burn up all the homeowner’s furniture so the homeowner has to come to their store to buy replacement furniture.


19 posted on 10/29/2012 4:43:14 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
... “impeachment” and “traitor”...over the top...Let’s just make sure the American people know what happened here so they can vote this loser out of office.

OK. Then how about "prosecution" and "conviction".

20 posted on 10/29/2012 4:44:11 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sure...right-wing conspiracy.

I am so sick of liberals screaming to high heaven about atrocities that happened under Bush, when there was no proof to back up their claims, and then are silent when Obama commits NUMEROUS atrocities that ARE factually proven to have happened.

Cindy Sheehan comes to mind....


21 posted on 10/29/2012 4:45:03 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Any sitting POTUS or Occupier of the White Hut who sacrifices American lives to Allah could make me hysterical.


22 posted on 10/29/2012 4:45:18 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

23 posted on 10/29/2012 4:46:28 PM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Obama bootlickers’ attitude is, “So what if a few nobodies were killed?” They are absolutely willing to sacrifice any number of people if it increases Obama’s chances of getting re-elected.


24 posted on 10/29/2012 4:49:16 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

I’ll settle for “landslide” and “President Romney” for now. I think Benghazi is way bigger than we can unravel in the next 7 days.


25 posted on 10/29/2012 4:58:09 PM PDT by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Four men are dead. It's not hysteria.

Bump

26 posted on 10/29/2012 5:00:34 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

An embassy (US soil) attacked, ambassador targeted and dead, strange behaviour from the White House. I don’t think it’s hysteria, but it may deflect attention if labeled so. Maybe it will work, eh?


27 posted on 10/29/2012 5:08:09 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
According to NBC News, Mitt Romney hasn’t mentioned Libya in his campaign appearances around the country since Oct. 12, which is more than two weeks ago. Now why do you think that is?

Fairly simple answer: Others are doing a far better job with better resources than the Romney campaign could do at discovering the facts.

The Romney campaign is focused on running a campaign not an investigation.

28 posted on 10/29/2012 5:14:52 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
When I think back on the Left-wing hysteria that fed upon itself to give us Watergate, it makes me so angry that they scoff at a sitting President not lifting a finger to do the job he is actually supposed to to do.

Yeah, I was about 15-16 at that time. It irks me to no end - even to this day - to remember how I bought into this line of hysteria (at the time I did not realize that our 'News Media' had a long history of acting as propagandists for Socialists and Democrats). I was convinced that President Nixon was the crookedest guy who came down the pike, and that John Dean was a paragon of virtue... What a sucker I was...
President Nixon might not win any awards for ethics, but what he did was 'nothing' compared with the crimes carried out with impunity by previous and subsequent Democrat Presidents. Two wrongs don't make a right, but President Nixon's actions, at most, justified a sternly written admonishment to be more forthcoming in the future.
And, crooked as he may have been, he still loved his country enough not to put it through a show-trial and a dragged out impeachment process (and remember that he loved his country enough, not to contest a pretty shady election win by JFK in 1960 ... unlike his Democrat counterpart some 40 years later).

I swallowed that Watergate spiel hook, line, and sinker. It was nothing but a Media engineered coup. And now, when there are real scandals, and real crimes resulting in deaths (Fast and Furious -- aka, 'Let's cancel the 2nd Amendment'; and Benghazi -- where we left 4 Americans to die -- for whatever reason: cowardice, or as the result of nefarious schemes) -- our wonderful Media is AWOL. A pox on the lot of them.

29 posted on 10/29/2012 5:15:35 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Not one of them ever served a day in uniform nor have they ever served in a group where no person is left behind, regardless of the cost. They are a bunch of selfish self-serving cowards.


30 posted on 10/29/2012 5:17:08 PM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ez

Oh, I think it’s unraveled plenty in the minds of the voters. Just look at the polls, of course only the election-day polls will count.

If we prevail, we need some criminal charges leveled.


31 posted on 10/29/2012 5:19:17 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ez

Yes. I did not find a good place to say this, so I will respond to FReepers here.

We are conservatives who live in Miami (Roads/Shenandoah area for those who are familiar with Miami). Up until about a week ago, we saw very few Obama- Biden signs on people’s front lawns. At the end of last week, we had a visit from a couple of Obama canvassers. We said of course thanks but no thanks.

The next morning we went out our front door to see new Obama signs sprouting from several of our neighbors’ lawns. (Since this is not a wealthy area, we suspect that in the Miami tradition they were given 20 bucks or so to put up the signs. We also know that all of those folks have connections to the public schools, whether because their daughter is a public school teacher and has gotten orders from the teachers union, or maybe something else).

We have now seen that, first, a bunch of Obama signs have appeared on the roads here, and, second, that a number of Romney/Ryan signs seem to have “disappeared” (they used to be by far the majority).

Maybe this is just a “cheap” last-ditch effort to turn Florida around, since Miami is pretty heavily democrat. But it sure would be nice to see some Romney signs out on the streets. (We will not because I work at a local university and have already had my car defaced once... because I have military stickers on my car for my two serving kids, and not because of Romney stickers).

I surely hope the Romney campaign is not taking Florida for granted.


32 posted on 10/29/2012 5:21:10 PM PDT by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hysteria? Liberals were frantic for months about some Muslim with panties on his head. Hysteria? A retired twit who worked for the CIA, being outed when, in fact, it was no secret. Hysteria? Bush continued to read a book to schoolchildren for EIGHT MINUTES, after he learned about 9/11. Weeks and weeks of the same old repetitive stories jammed down our throats.


33 posted on 10/29/2012 5:25:40 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Pat Caddell is hardly “right wing” but he is disgusted by the coverup.


34 posted on 10/29/2012 5:27:59 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Exactly. They would be interrupting Days of Our Lives with hourly bulletins, throwing themselves in front of presidential motorcades to demand that the president tell us how soon he was going to be resigning, and whether he planned to sign the death warrant for his treason himself.


35 posted on 10/29/2012 5:32:39 PM PDT by Humble Servant (Work for the most conservative one in the race, and keep up the pressure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mitt Romney hasn’t mentioned Libya in his campaign appearances around the country since Oct. 12, which is more than two weeks ago. Now why do you think that is?

Beck answered this question , namely that whatever Romney would say about it, if further developments in any way cast a different light on the quote, there would be an endless line of recrimination in the press, so Romney has refrained.

Also , Jay, Cindy Sheehan made a career of hectoring Bush about the death of her son in much more conventional circumstances to much media trumpeting. Now two of the killed have had parents openly question Obama, and you're too much of a pipsqueak to even acknowledge them.

36 posted on 10/29/2012 5:34:03 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Bookman is a waste of air but I’ll answer his window-licker question anyway. Romney doesn’t address it because he knows it’s far too serious to make a campaign issue out of it.


37 posted on 10/29/2012 5:36:05 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

When this idea that obumbler would smuggle arms to Syria by way of Libya was first mentioned, the libs totally ignored it. Crickets...

And a few laughed.

But then along comes Katherine Harris of Fox News with the same conclusion and tipsters that gave her the info.

Now this lib writer ridicules the idea.

Obviously there is something to it and that it is so big that it must be covered up no matter how.

This story is no over by a long way.


38 posted on 10/29/2012 5:39:26 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

Not one of them ever served a day in uniform nor have they ever served in a group where no person is left behind, regardless of the cost. They are a bunch of selfish self-serving cowards.


So true.

From a 3 rd generation vet......


39 posted on 10/29/2012 5:47:06 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: middlegeorgian
The AJC is still in circulation?

Sort of. It's circling the drain/bowl.

40 posted on 10/29/2012 5:47:31 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Bookman is a skunk of the first order...
And a professional dumb@$$....

*************

StandDown_5

41 posted on 10/29/2012 5:48:55 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
(FR is so slow I'm reposting. I tried posting this as a vanity thread, no luck.)

Will one freaking reporter in this country please ask President Obama if he granted or withheld

CROSS-BORDER AUTHORITY?

Everything I have read and seen so far on Benghazi is still confirming my initial thinking on the matter, going way back to my days as a NavSpecWar officer who took a SEAL det to Beirut a long time ago.

Once the alarm is sent from Benghazi, dozens of HQs are notified and are in the loop in real time, including AFRICOM and EURCOM, both located in Germany.

Without waiting for orders, they begin planning and executing rescue operations, including getting air support over Benghazi ASAP. But one thing they CANNOT DO without explicit orders from the POTUS is cross an international border. That is the big “red line.”

All POTUS has to do is NOT grant cross-border authority, and the entire rescue (already in progress) must stop in its tracks. Ships can loiter on station, but planes fall out of the sky, so they must be redirected to an air base (Sigonella Sicily) to await the POTUS decision on granting CBA. If it never comes, the men in Behghazi must rely only on assets already “in country” in Libya, such as the Tripoli QRF and the Predators.

(And possibly AC-130s that might already have been in Libya: they were last year, but their location on 9-11-2012 is unknown. If they were “in country” but were prevented from firing, that is another situation.)

So if at the 5 pm DC-time meeting with Panetta and Biden, Obama said, “No outside military action,” meaning no CBA will be granted, then THAT IS IT. Case closed.

That constitutes “standing orders” all the way down the chain of command via Panetta and Dempsey to Ham and the subordinate commands trying to rescue the men in Benghazi.

If Obama then goes upstairs to the family quarters to watch TV or sleep, or otherwise makes himself “unavailable,” then his last standing orders will stand until he changes them, even if he goes to sleep until the morning of 9-12.

Nobody in the chain of command below him can countermand his “standing orders” not to send military forces from outside of Libya into Libyan air space.

Nobody.

Personally, I think he left “no outside miltary intervention, no cross-border authority” standing orders, and then he went to bed. Damn him to hell.

(And to me, the most damning aspect of all is that Obama went to bed while his Ambassador was still missing and presumed kidnapped by Al Queda. Ambassador Stevens might have been on a Youtube video pleading for his life, ready to get the Nick Berg/Danny Pearl “intro to jihad” treatment, and Obama WENT TO BED to rest up for his much more important fund raiser in Las Vegas!)


42 posted on 10/29/2012 5:52:16 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
I think it is a little over the top to be using the words “impeachment” and “traitor” at this point.

Treason is a very serious charge.

43 posted on 10/29/2012 5:53:58 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
A simple comparison of two situations and the reaction of the 'News' media.

The first is the Valerie Plame 'outing' as an inactive CIA agent that over the 2003-2007. This had months of incessant and almost continuous media coverage on all news outlets. Numerous editorial pieces, demands for administration resignations and similar expressions of opposition outrage were almost continuous into the 2006-07 time frames. While there were no deaths nor monetary damages, VP Cheney's Chief of Staff 'Scooter' Libby was, in 2007, sentenced to 30 months in prison, a fine of US$250,000, and two years of supervised release after his prison term. After the sentence, President Bush (43) commuted the prison time but left the rest in place.

Now compare this Benghazi FUBAR with 4 deaths including the first Ambassador to be killed by violence in 30+ years. This affair involves a lot of obfuscation and confusion on the part of the current Administration at the highest levels. Of course this is only 6 weeks in the past and there is a 'on-going investigation' that promises a preliminary finding AFTER the coming general election.

However comparisons between these two situations do not support Mr Bookman's thesis. By most objective standards, the Plame was a small scandal made big by incessant media attention to the point of having a press encampment at Mr Libby's home. In comparison, the coverage of this Benghazi scandal, is being marked by non-coverage by the majority of the media. I wonder why the difference?

Does ANYBODY think that ANYONE will be accused of a crime here let alone be convicted? I mean other than the two area military commanders who have been recalled just recently?

44 posted on 10/29/2012 5:58:18 PM PDT by SES1066 (Government is NOT the reason for my existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I think he told Hillary to get Libya approval / involvement and left it at that.

Somewhere I recall she tried and was denied.

He wanted them to take all the responsibility, and never gave the military a go order.

This , to me, is the only reason they could say “ stand down”


45 posted on 10/29/2012 6:03:30 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Now why do you think that is?”

That is because he is running for president on his own merits. Others are doing a fine job if destroying his opponent’s alleged merits - total failure to defend Americans when needed being an obvious issue now.


46 posted on 10/29/2012 6:18:07 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

If the Republicans win the election they will still be republicans. Benghazigate will go dark and never be spoken of again.


47 posted on 10/29/2012 6:22:22 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

If the Republicans let this pass by, then they truly are fools. This can be the absolute death of the Democrat party. Obama has been caught doing everything the Democrats have been accusing the Republicans of for the past 40 years. Benghazi opens the door to let everyone see what a bunch of childish hypocrites they are. The Republicans could control everything for the next 20 years.


48 posted on 10/29/2012 7:11:11 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
The Republicans could control everything for the next 20 years.

Unfortunately the Republicans are not necessarily always the good guys either. I prefer conservative Americans to be in control.
49 posted on 10/29/2012 7:38:47 PM PDT by jy8z (From the next to last exit before the end of the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Mr Bookman, Ambassador Chris Stevens wasn’t the only one who could have been saved had the American people got what is expected out of the White House Situation Room.

Why did they fail, Mr Bookman?


50 posted on 10/29/2012 7:49:39 PM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson