Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scare Tactics Distract from Finding a Cure
Townhall.com ^ | October 30, 2012 | Carrie Lukas

Posted on 10/30/2012 9:31:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

With Halloween this week, one might assume that orange and black are the hands-down winners for favorite marketing décor. Yet pumpkins and witches hats have a formidable challenger in the pink ribbons signifying breast cancer awareness month, which currently adorn everything from grocery shelves to athletes’ uniforms.

The purpose behind breast cancer awareness month and the pink ribbon campaign is noble: to raise awareness about the risk and prevalence of breast cancer and build support and funding for continue research for treatments and ultimately a cure. Sadly, however, some seem to want to use the occasion not for education, but to spread misinformation about what scientists believe contributes to cancer.

Some feminist organizations and breast cancer groups are calling the pink ribbon campaign a “sellout” for allowing products that use commonly used chemicals to sport the pink ribbon. Certainly it would be a mixed message if the pink ribbon graced a pack of unfiltered cigarettes or rot-gut whiskey. But allowing canned goods, everyday cosmetics, and other household items that contain harmless amounts of chemicals to support breast cancer awareness month by featuring a pink ribbon is not just okay, but to do otherwise would send the wrong message about consensus views on what causes—and doesn’t cause—breast cancer.

Ms. Magazine, for example, objects to the pink ribbon being used on cosmetic products that contain phthalates, which they argue are linked to increased rates of cancer. Yet there is very little to suggest that normal use of phthalate-containing personal care products is really associated with heightened risk for cancer. And in fact, while campaigns like the Campaign for Safe Cosmeticscontinue to warn readers about phthalates, the Food and Drug Administration describes a long list of studies that have been conducted on phthalates that have never found any link to adverse health effects.

Thechemical Bisphenol A (BPA), which is used in shatterproof plastics, DVDs, and ski goggles, as well as to line canned foods to keep them fresh, has come under similar attack. Trace elements of BPA can be absorbed into food. Yet study after study has shown the miniscule amounts of BPA consumed through such normal, everyday uses have no impact on human health. Unfortunately, groups like the Breast Cancer Fund ignore that research, and continue to try to convince womenthat eating a can of Campell’s soup jeopardizes your health.

It would be one thing if such tactics just unnecessarily scared people and boosted sales of BPA-free foods and household items. Those BPA-free products tend to cost more and may not function as well, but it’s up to individual moms and dads if they want to use more of the family budget to avoid certain substances, even if the science suggests it’sunnecessary.

Yet the fear-mongering around certain substances also leads to a misallocation of resources that could be identifying the real drivers of cancer or new treatments and cures. Between 2009 and 2012, National Institute of Health grant funding increased about 2.6 percent. NIH’s breast cancer research fared much better, increasing by 13 percent. Yet BPA-related research did the best of all, rising more than 135% during that time frame.

In fact, thousands of studies have been conducted on BPA’s impact, and none have ever shown harm from normal use. How many more studies do taxpayers have to pay for, for activists to be satisfied that normal use of BPA is safe? Given that the paucity of evidence that BPA really presents a risk, wouldn’t these extra research dollars be better targeted elsewhere, such as to additional research on new treatments for diseases like breast cancer?

Cancer is a scary disease. Since early detection can be key, it’s important that everyone should be aware of symptoms of disease like breast cancer and take action to try to keep themselves healthy. Yet activists who create boogie men out of harmless products don’t advance the cause of better healthy; they create distractions that impede real progress.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/30/2012 9:31:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The whole thing is out of control and has lost sight of its purpose.


2 posted on 10/30/2012 9:36:00 AM PDT by bmwcyle (45% to 47% of American voters are stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

If they had taken all the money spent on pink tchochtkes they would have had a helluva research facility... just saying.


3 posted on 10/30/2012 9:43:32 AM PDT by Dinah Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When do you cross the line from being concerned about breast cancer to trying to profit from it?

I could see some ad executive saying "Cut the red dye by 2/3, slap a pink ribbon on this run of the label and the chicks will go wild buying it because 'we care'. Put the dye savings into our department's gin budget."


4 posted on 10/30/2012 9:47:00 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The purpose behind breast cancer awareness month and the pink ribbon campaign is noble: to raise awareness about the risk and prevalence of breast cancer and build support and funding

No, BC Awareness month is for the sole purpose of raising money. Period.

5 posted on 10/30/2012 9:48:32 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Awareness” campaigns are more about making the people participating in the campaigns feel good, than they are about fixing any problems. They’re a total joke. Everyone’s aware of cancer, everyone is aware of AIDS, and even if they weren’t, a silly ribbon wouldn’t do anything to inform them.

Now, if anyone wants to join my plaid ribbon campaign to raise gonorrhea awareness, I am accepting donations :P


6 posted on 10/30/2012 9:48:44 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A busybody at work asked me to join the awareness craze by wearing pink. I don’t have anything pink, and didn’t really care one way or another about the whole thing, so I found a photo of a certain very colorful bird, cut it out, and attached it to my ID badge. When asked what I was doing to commemorate breast cancer awareness I showed them the bird. When asked what it was, I replied, “A Great Tit.”


7 posted on 10/30/2012 9:55:42 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You’ll have to forgive me for being skeptical of the gubmint studies claiming the safety of these chemicals. In fact, since eliminating these same products from my life I’ve reversed my PCOS. Maybe it’s coincidental, but I still don’t trust gubmint funded studies.


8 posted on 10/30/2012 9:56:11 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Rush demonstrated the ribbon campaign on his old tv show.

Ribbons, and color, just means “I am better than you because I care more than you.”

This is just using a pink ribbon as marketing nothing else.

I remember watching a tv show about a race to find the markers for breast cancer. not for a cure but to a screening all women would have to undergo and even recieve federal funding to provide.


9 posted on 10/30/2012 9:56:28 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I will not have anything to do with Komen.

Only about 20% of what they raise goes to research and they fund Planned Parenthood.

Thats all I need to know.


10 posted on 10/30/2012 9:58:38 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
11 posted on 10/30/2012 11:06:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson