Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama,Biden indicted by Florida Grand Jury
Freedoml Watch | 10/30/12

Posted on 10/30/2012 7:11:47 PM PDT by Captain7seas

Obama and Biden Indicted by Grand Jury

(Ocala, Florida, October 30, 2012). Larry Klayman, the founder and chairman of Freedom Watch today announced that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden have been criminally indicted for having willfully released classified national security information concerning the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound, U.S. and Israeli war plans concerning Iran and their cyber-attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The release of this information, among other harm to U.S. national security, resulted in the killing of members of Seal Team Six by terrorists and the arrest and imprisonment of American covert agents by Pakistan, such as the doctor who aided the CIA with regard to the bin Laden assassination. U.S.-Israeli war plans with Iran have also been compromised.

A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens’ Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.

The authority for a Citizens’ Grand Jury can be found at

The criminal defendants, Obama and Biden, will now be given notice of their indictment, arraigned and then tried for their alleged crimes.

Mr. Klayman, the Citizens’ Prosecutor, issued the following statement: “The Citizens’ Grand Jury, after having deliberated, yesterday issued a true bill of indictment. See It did the work that the government should have done, but does not have the integrity to do; that is hold these public officials accountable under the law. For far too long, government prosecutors, who are put in place by politicians, have looked the other way as high public officials like Obama and Biden violate the law to further their political agendas.

Now, as a result, the people must therefore exercise the rights given to them by the framers of the Constitution, and themselves take legitimate measures to restore the nation to some semblance of legality.

This indictment (see of Obama and Biden is just the first step in a legal revolution to reclaim the nation from establishment politicians, government officials and judges who have represented only their own political and other interests at the expense of ‘We the People.’

Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes.”

For information see or contact Adrienne Mazzone: 561-750-9800 x210; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: indicment; obama; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: everyone


Losing will shred his ginormous ego.

He'll NEVER recover!

Contribute to grassroots Free Republic Today!

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Is this real? I’m flabbergasted. Will Obama look the other way? Can the Justice Department intervene? Will the courts throw this out as a joke?

22 posted on 10/30/2012 8:03:43 PM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: phockthis
Read the whole thing at the website. It is quite informative. Antonin Scalia effectively codified the unique independent power of the Fourth Branch into the hands of all citizens sitting as federal grand jurors.

Of course these clowns were not Federal grand jurors, but make believe grand jurors. Whose authority is similarly make believe.

23 posted on 10/30/2012 8:09:26 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mia

“Will Obama look the other way?”

How can he look the other way when he has been indicted by The Citizens’ Grand Jury and will undergo a citizen’s arrest by the Citizens’ Police and will be found guilty by a The Citizens’ Court?

24 posted on 10/30/2012 8:09:35 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Well, the media will look the other way. Just look at Bengazi. The media pretends it didn’t happen, so. . . it didn’t happen.

25 posted on 10/30/2012 8:12:14 PM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

I am sure you have heard ELECTED and APPOINTED officials say, they have immunity from prosecution for any thing they have done wrong. Prosecutors and police officers are notorious for that statement. There is a U.S. Supreme Court case that says they are liable.

George D Owen V. City of Independence, Missouri. Decided April 16, 1980.
When you look this up scroll down to 25 See, e.g., Globe 365 (remarks of Rep. Arthur) (For Owen v Independence Click (HERE)

George M. WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
David HAYSE, in his Official Capacity as Judge in Fayette
District Court, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-5382.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 1993.
E.D.Ky., No. 92-00510; Forester, J.


Before: GUY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.


George M. Wallace, a pro se Kentucky prisoner, appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d), his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Wallace’s suit was filed against Fayette County District Court Judge David Hayse. Judge Hayse was sued in his official capacity, and Wallace sought injunctive and declaratory relief. The magistrate judge’s report determined that Judge Hayse was absolutely immune from suit because the allegations of Wallace’s complaint indicated that Judge Hayse was acting in his judicial capacity. Over Wallace’s objections, the district judge determined that when a judge is performing an adjudicative function, he is absolutely immune from all suits brought pursuant to Sec. 1983. On appeal, Wallace argues that judicial immunity does not extend to Sec. 1983 suits which request injunctive and declaratory relief.

In Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522, 541-42 (1984), the court concluded “that judicial immunity is not a bar to prospective injunctive relief against a judicial officer acting in her judicial capacity.” See also Berger v. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass’n, 983 F.2d 718, 721 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2416 (1993); Sevier v. Turner, 742 F.2d 262, 269 (6th Cir.1984). Therefore, we conclude that the district court committed error when it dismissed Wallace’s suit based upon the determination that Judge Hayse enjoyed absolute immunity against Sec. 1983 suits which request injunctive and declaratory relief.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
1 F.3d 1243, Wallace v. Hayse, (C.A.6 (Ky.) 1993

26 posted on 10/30/2012 8:12:25 PM PDT by phockthis ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

I didn’t say these guys went about it the right way...LOL

I do hope to educate as many people as to what our REAL LAW is in the hopes people will one day learn to use it

27 posted on 10/30/2012 8:15:12 PM PDT by phockthis ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

I appreciate the legal research from the Freepers who took the time to check this out

Not sure how far this will go....but I have more respect for Larry Klayman pursuing this....than the usual PhonyCon crowd (Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, etc) who do nothing but attack those who question Obama’s Eligibility....and even attacked people like Sheriff Joe Arpaio/and his posse for proving that the Obam Birth Cert he released in 2011 was a fake.

If you are not an Obama definitely will be an Obama Supporter. Whose side are you on?

28 posted on 10/30/2012 8:20:03 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Political maturity is realizing that the "R" next to someone's name does not mean "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

This would not be sound, even if it were issued by a real grand jury. For every piece of classified information the Government has, there is a set of people who are entitled to declassify it. The president is a member of the set, in all cases. I don’t know whether anyone else has the authority to declassify whatever he pleases, but the president can.

The whole classified information system operates under the authority of the president. In effect, all of the nation’s secrets belong to him personally. The presidency is a powerful office.

A president can even declassify things without meaning to. When Jimmy Carter blabbed some previously classified information about spy satellite capabilities, that information was automatically declassified on authority J. Carter, President of the United States. (This set off a scramble to determine what information had been declassified, and what was still classified.) I’ve never seen any indication that he did it on purpose. If anyone else had done it, it would have been a crime; for him, it wasn’t.

29 posted on 10/30/2012 8:30:56 PM PDT by Keb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

The name “Larry Klayman” is all one needs to know to determine how this will end. His specialty is PayPal law...without results

30 posted on 10/30/2012 8:32:47 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (Muppet season now open - no bag limit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Has Freedom Watch ever won a case?

31 posted on 10/30/2012 8:33:34 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Good luck with that.

32 posted on 10/30/2012 8:42:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

Somehow I just believe that these morons have/or think, they are covered by some blanket of protection, and above the Law.. Maybe not!

Nothing would please me more than they get prosecuted for some if not all of their lawlessness..

33 posted on 10/30/2012 9:20:53 PM PDT by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Obama will never see the inside of a courtroom for any reason. Like Eric Holder, he has pigmentation immunity.

34 posted on 10/30/2012 10:17:47 PM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson