"Works for me."
Posted on 10/31/2012 8:44:23 AM PDT by IbJensen
This slut doesn’t seem to realize her 15 minutes are up...
"Someone stop me before I screw again!"
"Save me Trojan Condoms!"
"My Kingdom for a condom!"
If she was worth hitting she would have a line of pimps wanting to add her to their stable of (ahem) ladies.
She goes down more often than a WWI U-boat.
This slut doesn’t seem to realize her 15 minutes are up...
How proud her parents must be. Didn’t Georgetown used to be a Catholic University?
Georgetown law student! This is why you should quit electing lawyers. Can’t even figure out how to have sex without the government being involved. And down the line after all this yappin she’ll turn out to be a lesbian.
Sandra has intellectual arguments without a moral foundation, hence, baseless.
There is an acquaintance that I frequently email, at least used to, that a few months back said to me, “You can’t legislate a woman’s vagina!”, to which I simply replied, “It’s murder”.
He was obviously spoon fed his position on abortion at an intellectual level, but, when I hit him with the moral implications, he was stone cold quiet.
Intellect, reason, without a moral foundation is akin to a ship without a rudder, floundering.
Intellectuals, if I’m not simply listening and accepting their superior reason, find me worthless....a useless eater.
Ingratiating myself to them is an empty path.
The grace of God ensures my separation from their darkness.
I am very grateful to the only wise God for this.
“Has she apologized to her mom for being a barrier?”
Awesome ans subtle point.
Sandra is of the typical, “Not for me, but for thee” elitism.
“Sandra must be constantly clubbed over the head by cavemen and dragged back to the cave for some abuse!”
I resent the insinuation that my kind would have anything to do with her.
That says it all - maybe it should be made into a bumper sticker.
It is. I've had it on my cars for at least 10 years.
Here’s my big beef with the women’s activists who have adopted “choice” as the key word in their political mantra.
The problem with their choice is the choices that are not any big priority for them.
Chosing to not engage in sexual intercourse when you are not married is not a priorty.
Chosing to not engage in sexual intercourse with a partner with whom there is no mutual committment to marriage is not a priority.
Chosing to use contraceptive means if engaging in sexual intercourse with a partner with whom there is no mutual committment to marriage is not a priority.
Chosing to raise a child conceived out of wedlock is not a priority.
Having an abortion escapes the need to make all the other choices that could have been made, and is the priority.
The “woman’s ‘right’ to chose” is reduced to a ‘right’ to one choice - abortion.
The fact is that a woman has “the right” to make all the other choices that would preclude getting an abortion, but the womens’ movement thinks so little of those choices as responsible choices they are not that movements’ priority.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.