Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benghazi Stand Down Denials Don't Stand Up To Reason
Forbes ^ | November 1, 2012 | Larry Bell

Posted on 11/01/2012 6:47:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

There are some large disconnects between Obama administration explanations concerning security and response actions taken before, during and after the disastrous terrorist attacks on our Benghazi consulate and accounts,compared with those which continue to emerge from outside sources. Following numerous White House claims now known to be inaccurate and intentionally misleading,we are repeatedly assured that we will get the real scoop in due time after full investigations are complete. One perplexing issue,among many, evolves around conflicting accounts regarding requests and denials of military aid which might have saved American lives.

Further delays only increase wide-spread suspicions that there are no legitimate answers,and that the president’s strategy is to run out the clock until after his final election is over. If this were not the case, it would seem logical that he would seize upon every opportunity to demonstrate evidence of the leadership and transparency he has repeatedly promised. Meanwhile, those who dare to raise those questions and express such suspicions are often subjected by his supporters to scornful reproach. And yes,I speak from experience on this…a subject I will get to later.

Putting serious questions aside regarding why early requests for enhanced consulate security had been repeatedly denied, along with misplaced blame for the attack on an obscure anti-Muslim video,let’s focus exclusively upon controversies surrounding that fateful seven-hour assault period.

During an October 16 interview, Denver’s WUSA-TV reporter Kyle Clark asked President Obama a two-part question: “Were the Americans under attack at the consulate in Benghazi,Libya denied requests for help during that attack,and is it fair to tell Americans that what happened is under investigation until after the election?” Expressing his regret about the casualties and sympathy for their families,plus a determination to bring the perpetrators to justice,the president didn’t answer either question.

After dodging, Clark asked the first and most important part again:..

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghazigate; benghazistanddown; embassymurders; gbbenghazi; libya; mediacoverup; obamacoverup; shadowwars; threatmatrix

1 posted on 11/01/2012 6:47:10 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

There is nothing to ‘investigate’ Obama was responsible-period.


2 posted on 11/01/2012 6:50:27 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; penelopesire; onyx; maggief; thouworm; MestaMachine; Nachum; LucyT; ...

Glenn Beck just said he has the memo that includes the stand down order. He knows which networks are sitting on it and if they don’t run the story he is going to expose them. He is only holding it to cover his sources. This is going to get very hot quickly.


3 posted on 11/01/2012 6:56:05 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

” Following numerous White House claims now known to be inaccurate and intentionally misleading....”

BINGO! CNN is picking this up and now WSJ....maybe hurricane Sandy just pushed these questions closer to election day,,hmmmm?


4 posted on 11/01/2012 6:56:09 AM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

All the investigation needed is:

Ask Obama, what did YOU do when confronted with this situation. Where were you? What did you see, hear, KNOW about what was happening? What did you order? What did you sign. And why? What were you thinking?

As usual, the peekaboo President (who comes out into the light when he wants and hides when he doesn’t, and who changes colors like a chameleon depending on the landscape, and who does it all to advance an anti-American agenda), has been answering a question nobody is asking.

Nobody is wanting him to investigate what happened over in that place at that time. What they want is for him to answer for his actions as President of the United States.

And that he refuses to do, even morphing the question into something nobody is asking because we already know, well enough, what happened over there on that day.

So far, he appears to be getting away with it.

But reckoning of one kind or another is on its way...


5 posted on 11/01/2012 7:01:19 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why does it say at the top that this is from the Wall St. Journal, but then the link to the article is to Forbes? Did the WSJ reprint it?


6 posted on 11/01/2012 7:01:25 AM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Have we retaken either the Annex or the mission buildings in Benghazi? I thought those were “American soil”? We were defeated and run out of Benghazi by Al Qaeda. Ohhhhh....that doesn’t look good for Obama.


7 posted on 11/01/2012 7:03:31 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2952939/posts?q=1&;page=51


8 posted on 11/01/2012 7:04:15 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 11/01/2012 7:04:28 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
There are some large disconnects...

Code for 'they're up to their eyeballs in lies'...

10 posted on 11/01/2012 7:05:46 AM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Thank Goodness one of “the good guys” has it!


11 posted on 11/01/2012 7:08:03 AM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
OBOZO will be prosecuted by “We The People” for treason on Nov. 6th. His trial will start Nov. 7th and sentenced to life without parole shortly thereafter. He will be cuffed, chained and provided an orange jump suit on Jan 20th and escorted to prison on same day. Mandatory listening to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck as well as Mark Levin 24/7 recordings will be just part of his punishment.
12 posted on 11/01/2012 7:10:51 AM PDT by Evil Slayer ((Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

Thank Goodness one of “the good guys” has it!

Yes and my guess is he will make an offer to hire the reporter who feels he or she is getting shut down by the network. He said he had 100 people who are so scared for this country who have this information that want to get it out before the elction.


13 posted on 11/01/2012 7:11:26 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: crosslink; Cincinatus' Wife

Also from Beck, just now, “I agree with what Morris predicted, 300 EVs and somewhere between 5% and 10% popular vote margin for Mitt Romney”.

Maybe they’re looking at the election this way:

***Pols see polls point to Romney triumph; ‘hidden vote’ to crush Obama***

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2953110/posts?page=2


14 posted on 11/01/2012 7:19:03 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
“Code for ‘they're up to their eyeballs in lies’...”

That's a problem with lies. It is hard enough for one person to keep the story straight but when several have to parrot it, it is impossible. A coherent story consisting of the truth is so easy to remember.

Obama, the cowardly lyin’.

15 posted on 11/01/2012 7:22:55 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

“He said he had 100 people who are so scared for this country who have this information that want to get it out before the elction.”

100 people affiliate with the news networks/outlets?

One must be CNN??


16 posted on 11/01/2012 7:23:07 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: married21

I’ve been looking at a lot of sources and had a brain hiccup. I’ve asked the moderator to correct it to “Forbes.” Thank you for letting me know.


17 posted on 11/01/2012 7:23:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: married21; Admin Moderator
-- Why does it say at the top that this is from the Wall St. Journal ... --

That appears to be an error on the part of the person who posted the article. I doubt WSJ reprints material from Forbes.

I've copied admin moderator, who has the power to correct the mistake.

18 posted on 11/01/2012 7:24:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

100 people affiliate with the news networks/outlets

No in the Gov. He said they can’t sleep because they are afraid for the country and their lives.


19 posted on 11/01/2012 7:26:05 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Thanks for the clarification. So, Beck’s sources are government? Did those sources pass it on to MSM?

Much what is coming out about the stand-down order is fragmented.


20 posted on 11/01/2012 7:29:35 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

While no Americans died in the other attacks, there were Islamic flags flying over embassies in other countries too, but besides (mostly) ignoring Libya, they also ignore the many attacks we faced in the days after Libya.


21 posted on 11/01/2012 7:31:34 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

A reelected obama has impeachment to look forward to...


22 posted on 11/01/2012 7:34:51 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I have to admit, I am shocked that CNN let this get out. It's only an editorial, the blackout continues elsewhere...

Benghazi... oh, we'll get to that...


   
23 posted on 11/01/2012 7:36:04 AM PDT by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I think the youtube video meme was meant to give us the impression that a run of the mill protest suddenly got out of hand...and there was nothing anyone could do to help.

Once the whole seven hour battle comes to light, its obvious that somebody denied help.


24 posted on 11/01/2012 7:40:18 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Thanks for the clarification. So, Beck’s sources are government? Did those sources pass it on to MSM

He said he knows from inside the media outlets that this memo is in their hands. He said he will expose the media outlet. He said he had the same memo they have. He is giving them time to do the story or he will do it and then expose they knew and didn’t act.


25 posted on 11/01/2012 7:44:24 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Bambi & Co. also seem to have missed the fact that there was a major attack on our embassy in Cairo that ended up with the black flag of AQ flying over the American Embassy...earlier that very same day.

That was their first apology for the video; you’d think they wouldn’t have forgotten so soon!


26 posted on 11/01/2012 7:49:58 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

They laughed it off when it was mentioned that the President did not attend intelligence briefings. He didn’t need to. He read and absorbed his daily written summaries.

Did the President attend a briefing between August 16th and September 11th? Was this on the agenda for any of those meetings.

Was it on the agenda of a briefing he missed?


27 posted on 11/01/2012 7:54:43 AM PDT by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Where’s Travis McGee today?


28 posted on 11/01/2012 8:59:34 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Free Engineer

“Did the President attend a briefing between August 16th and September 11th? Was this on the agenda for any of those meetings.”

“Was it on the agenda of a briefing he missed?”

Do you think he cared? Do you think he cares now?


29 posted on 11/01/2012 9:02:44 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
He was stood up as a fat target and denied protection for nearly a month. The cover story is that they wanted Libya to appear "normal, calm, and at peace." Once the hit began, all defense was called off, under the premise that these were mere "bumps in the road." Once it was done, all American attempts to secure the site and protect our data were refused. All is "normal, calm, and at peace" again.

Yup. Does that make sense? Nope. One has to belay everything we know about the past records of both Hillary and Zero and believe their public faces totally to accept such weird idealism at root.

No way. Both Hillary and Zero are demonstrably hardened cutthroat politicians mad for power. So then one must seek another thesis.

What makes this so hard to understand and accept is that the only rational explanation for what happened is that Stevens' death was a conscious decision on the part of BOTH Zero and Hillary, IOW, they wanted him dead. Stevens could not be allowed to be kidnapped and forced to talk (by either AQ or the Russians) about running weapons to Syria, never mind what he knows about Zero personally.

Standing him up and standing down the military might well have been a condition on the part of the Russians to belay retaliation for our intrigue on their turf (Syria), but only as long as we spilled the beans by leaving the site open for "inspection."

THEN it all makes sense. Of course, THEN one must accept that Hillary and Zero are both murderous thugs. What's so hard about that? They're both perfectly happy to argue for letting a doctor stab scissors into a baby's head and suck out the brains, so why would they balk at a hit on Stevens?

30 posted on 11/01/2012 9:50:57 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers us choices: convert or kill, submit or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I hope so.


31 posted on 11/04/2012 4:13:22 AM PST by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: livius

You are right.


32 posted on 11/04/2012 4:13:32 AM PST by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson