Well I guess by now the traitors have had time to come up with a plausible sounding story.
But how to explain all the contradictory stories that have already been published?
Also, what is the source of this story? I could have done much better than this :)
And, why has it taken this long for such a simple timeline to be published?
I call BS on this.
keep in mind, we had live comms... and it SHOULD all be recorded somewhere
congress must DEMAND to be able to review ALL data and render a judgement (won’t be able to declassify... but the congressman should have clearance)
of course, the congressman must not be out to bury the story
The title, "In Benghazi timeline, CIA errors but no evidence of conspiracy," will not tamp down the controversy but rather add gasoline to the fire. Ignatius may not understand what he has provided, but I will bet a million dollars that there will be plenty of former WH, intel, and military officials will go ballistic when reading this. The fire has been started and it will spread to the WH by tomorrow. This article raises so many questions, it is impossible to list them all.
Your screen name is what I wanted to do when I read this story. It is so weak and full of holes as pointed out by you and others here.