Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLS Employment Situation Summary (up 0.1% to 7.9%)
Bureau of Labor Statistics ^ | 2 Nov 12 | Bureau of Labor Statistics

Posted on 11/02/2012 5:35:32 AM PDT by xzins

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- OCTOBER 2012

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 171,000 in October, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 7.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment rose in professional and business services, health care, and retail trade.

_______________________________________________________________________________ | | | Hurricane Sandy | | | |Hurricane Sandy had no discernable effect on the employment and unemployment | |data for October. Household survey data collection was completed before the | |storm, and establishment survey data collection rates were within normal ranges| |nationally and for the affected areas. For information on how unusually severe | |weather can affect the employment and hours estimates, see the Frequently Asked| |Questions section of this release. | | | |_______________________________________________________________________________|

Household Survey Data

Both the unemployment rate (7.9 percent) and the number of unemployed persons (12.3 million) were essentially unchanged in October, following declines in September. (See table A-1.)

Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rate for blacks increased to 14.3 percent in October, while the rates for adult men (7.3 percent), adult women (7.2 percent), teenagers (23.7 percent), whites (7.0 percent), and Hispanics (10.0 percent) showed little or no change. The jobless rate for Asians was 4.9 percent in October (not seasonally adjusted), down from 7.3 percent a year earlier. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)

In October, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) was little changed at 5.0 million. These individuals accounted for 40.6 percent of the unemployed. (See table A-12.)

The civilian labor force rose by 578,000 to 155.6 million in October, and the labor force participation rate edged up to 63.8 percent. Total employment rose by 410,000 over the month. The employment-population ratio was essentially unchanged at 58.8 percent, following an increase of 0.4 percentage point in September. (See table A-1.)

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) fell by 269,000 to 8.3 million in October, partially offsetting an increase of 582,000 in September. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. (See table A-8.)

In October, 2.4 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, little different from a year earlier. (These data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)

Among the marginally attached, there were 813,000 discouraged workers in October, a decline of 154,000 from a year earlier. (These data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.6 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in October had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. (See table A-16.)

Establishment Survey Data

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 171,000 in October. Employment growth has averaged 157,000 per month thus far in 2012, about the same as the average monthly gain of 153,000 in 2011. In October, employment rose in professional and business services, health care, and retail trade. (See table B-1.)

Professional and business services added 51,000 jobs in October, with gains in services to buildings and dwellings (+13,000) and in computer systems design (+7,000). Temporary help employment changed little in October and has shown little net change over the past 3 months. Employment in professional and business services has grown by 1.6 million since its most recent low point in September 2009.

Health care added 31,000 jobs in October. Job gains continued in ambulatory health care services (+25,000) and hospitals (+6,000). Over the past year, employment in health care has risen by 296,000.

Retail trade added 36,000 jobs in October, with gains in motor vehicles and parts dealers (+7,000), and in furniture and home furnishings stores (+4,000). Retail trade has added 82,000 jobs over the past 3 months, with most of the gain occurring in motor vehicles and parts dealers, clothing and accessories stores, and miscellaneous store retailers.

Employment in leisure and hospitality continued to trend up (+28,000) over the month. This industry has added 811,000 jobs since a recent low point in January 2010, with most of the gain occurring in food services.

Employment in construction edged up in October. The gain was concentrated in specialty trade contractors (+17,000).

Manufacturing employment changed little in October. On net, manufacturing employment has shown little change since April.

Mining lost 9,000 jobs in October, with most of the decline occurring in support activities for mining. Since May of this year, employment in mining has decreased by 17,000.

Employment in other major industries, including wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information, financial activities, and government, showed little change over the month.

In October, the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was 34.4 hours for the fourth consecutive month. The manufacturing workweek edged down by 0.1 hour to 40.5 hours, and factory overtime was unchanged at 3.2 hours. The average workweek for production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls edged down by 0.1 hour to 33.6 hours. (See tables B-2 and B-7.)

In October, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls edged down by 1 cent to $23.58. Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have risen by 1.6 percent. In October, average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees edged down by 1 cent to $19.79. (See tables B-3 and B-8.)

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for August was revised from +142,000 to +192,000, and the change for September was revised from +114,000 to +148,000.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bamarigged; cokeheadgames; cooked4obama; numb3rs; obamanomics; ue3; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2012 5:35:38 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins

The highest estimate was 150,000. And they blew that away.

It will be interesting to see November/December. I am skeptical.


2 posted on 11/02/2012 5:37:14 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (The dude abides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Watch the MSM try to spin this into good news. Too bad, it won’t work. Jobless rate went up.


3 posted on 11/02/2012 5:37:35 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Liars. The rate is higher.


4 posted on 11/02/2012 5:37:50 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

MSNBC is saying..this is a positive for the president..it shows the economy is improving...it went up..but this is so so good...WTF!?


5 posted on 11/02/2012 5:37:55 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt; All

Holiday Hiring...


6 posted on 11/02/2012 5:38:21 AM PDT by KevinDavis (And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’m shocked! I expected them to cook the books down below 7% for Dear Ruler.


7 posted on 11/02/2012 5:38:58 AM PDT by Marathoner (If the bastard were to win reelection, let America burn. IDGAF anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Not what Obama needed, but he can say he kept it under 8% for all that’s worth.


8 posted on 11/02/2012 5:39:07 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Anyone know if all states are reporting? I heard something last night that New York and New Jersey numbers wouldn’t be incldued...can’t confirm.

How do you get an increase in non-farm hiring and a rise in the rate? Shouldn’t htey work inversely? I think need to turn off the TV until next Wednesday. Thanks for the post, though..


9 posted on 11/02/2012 5:39:07 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The spin will be althought the rate of unemployment was up it was because more people entered the workforce feeling they had a better chance of getting a job.


10 posted on 11/02/2012 5:39:47 AM PDT by Lacey2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

so an increase from 7.8 to 7.9 is ‘unchanged’?

interesting


11 posted on 11/02/2012 5:40:09 AM PDT by Mr. K (What The World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
MSNBC is saying..this is a positive for the president...

Obama could be caught in bed with a dead women or live boy and MSNBC would say it is positive for the President....

12 posted on 11/02/2012 5:40:31 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Market not liking the number


13 posted on 11/02/2012 5:40:36 AM PDT by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The 7.8% number for September was later “corrected” to 7.9%.


14 posted on 11/02/2012 5:40:40 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

15 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:01 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Very true about MSNBC they even spun the fact that the # of people looking for a job(vs those that gave up) went up!! How is that good news


16 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:06 AM PDT by shadeaud ( “Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8”. Just doing my duty a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins

They will spin it positively. Because more jobs were added than expected. Of course, the rate went up, and they would have spun THAT otherwise.. its always about spin spin spin.


17 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:27 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The report said that approximately 400,000 people starting looking for work this past month. Under the stupid BLS formula, the more people that are looking for work and do not find work, the more unemployment.

That’s why Rush has been saying that the only way to manufacture a decrease in unemployment is to shrink the universe of people looking for a job. It worked in the inverse this month.


18 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:40 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bad news for the president, the only number people pay attention to is the unemployment rate and it went UP UP UP. I hope Romney has the commercials ready to go...


19 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:46 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

They are already hard at work doing just that.

The spin is that the higher unemployment rate validates the President’s policies and proves the economy is improving.


20 posted on 11/02/2012 5:42:00 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“Employment growth has averaged 157,000 per month thus far in 2012, about the same as the average monthly gain of 153,000 in 2011.”

That’s the key point. 2012 has not been an improvement over 2011. All is flat.

Another key point: Gallup was wrong. Don’t you forget it.


21 posted on 11/02/2012 5:42:59 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
MSNBC is saying..this is a positive for the president..it shows the economy is improving...it went up..but this is so so good...WTF!?

If unemployment went up to 12%, MSNBC would argue that it's a positive for Obama because the vast majority of voters didn't lose their jobs.

22 posted on 11/02/2012 5:43:05 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

Isn’t it interesting that the unemployment rate magically ended up at 7.9% instead of 8% right before the election? Imagine that!


23 posted on 11/02/2012 5:43:27 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I don’t recall that.


24 posted on 11/02/2012 5:43:40 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

Bottom line - the unemployment rate went up. That needs to be shouted from the rooftops all day every day from here through Tuesday.

It also will bring the race back to the economic issue front and center.


25 posted on 11/02/2012 5:44:52 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud; All

Well you are talking about the Official Obama news network..


26 posted on 11/02/2012 5:45:29 AM PDT by KevinDavis (And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John W

The unemployment rate went UP. There was no revision that I can see.. Headline: Unemployment rate rises right before election.


27 posted on 11/02/2012 5:45:48 AM PDT by Outraged At FLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xzins
(unchanged at 7.9 percent)

If that's your adder, it incorrect. If it's the real headline, it's incorrect. It was 7.8% last month. It went up!

28 posted on 11/02/2012 5:45:57 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom

Oh yeah..it goes down, that’s good. It goes up, that’s also good. It reminds me of the “climate change” debate. Hotter than expected? Climate change! Colder than expected? Well, that’s also climate change and “proof” of global warming.

Liberals have no shame, especially those in the “news” media.


29 posted on 11/02/2012 5:46:18 AM PDT by corlorde (forWARD of the state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

When people have more confidence they start again looking for work so they increase the total actively searching and therefore raise the rate of unemployed (actively looking for a job)

Remember the rate is determined by the number of people LOOKING for work and not the numnber of unemployed. This is why when the labor participation rate drops the unemployment nunber also drops.


30 posted on 11/02/2012 5:46:43 AM PDT by Lacey2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: apillar

“the only number people pay attention to is the unemployment rate and it went UP UP UP.”

Right! The dumb “undecideds” don’t dive into the details. That’s why they are “undecided”. The top line number is all they care about, for better or worse. MSNBC can spin these data all they like, but they’re wasting their oxygen on their brain-addled viewership.


31 posted on 11/02/2012 5:46:47 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins

How is it “essentially” unchanged if it ticked up one tenth? When it ticked down one tenth they said flat out the unemployment rate dropped. lol

Unbelievable.


32 posted on 11/02/2012 5:47:06 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
“...the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 7.9 percent...”

That's racist.

33 posted on 11/02/2012 5:47:06 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
If it's the real headline, it's incorrect. It was 7.8% last month. It went up!

Lemme guess..."Unexpectedly"...?

34 posted on 11/02/2012 5:47:58 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

The point is..it went up..even we are spinning this in a positive light.it went up!..it is higher than when Bush left office!..if Romney and the GOP don’t flood the airways this weekend and win this election..they are incompetent fools..if they fight, they win..they have history and numbers on their side...if they lose, it’s because they like playing too nice and we deserve to LOSE...This election is Romney’s to lose...


35 posted on 11/02/2012 5:48:05 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins

With all due respect change your headline. That’s not the headline of the article in parenthesis.


36 posted on 11/02/2012 5:48:27 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

It happened yesterday. They revised the numbers. The increase in the number of jobs created was cut in half.

Number of unemployed increased by 170,000

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm


37 posted on 11/02/2012 5:48:51 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1; xzins

That is his adder but he’s getting it from the wording in the article. Still its a lie.


38 posted on 11/02/2012 5:50:13 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

“Watch the MSM try to spin this into good news”

They already did.

An INCREASE was reported as “essentially unchanged”.


39 posted on 11/02/2012 5:50:13 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

For once, everyone expected the rate to go up to 7.9%. Unlike last month, when everyone was saying it was going to stay the same or go up and it went down, UNEXPECTEDLY! (through number manipulation)


40 posted on 11/02/2012 5:51:54 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

I changed the headline to revert it as closely as possible to the original.


41 posted on 11/02/2012 5:51:54 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This will change nothing.


42 posted on 11/02/2012 5:52:38 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Given that our current federal methodology purposely under-counts inflation (by which we’ve actually continued in contraction rather than an expansion straight through Obama’s four years), real wages are really plummeting.

And of course even the 7.9% figure is bogus.


43 posted on 11/02/2012 5:52:41 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Unemployment amongst blacks jumped almost a full point. Just shaking my head at that number.. That is truly sad.


44 posted on 11/02/2012 5:53:39 AM PDT by Outraged At FLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

The ‘effin WSJ bloggers are all spinning it positive for Obama, even in the face of many negative features of this report. Incredible.

http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2012/11/02/live-from-new-york-its-jobs-friday-19/?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines


45 posted on 11/02/2012 5:54:17 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

My original posting said the number Rose. My headline was changed to “unchanged”

I have no idea why.

7.8 to 7.9 is an increase according to everyone from my math teacher spouse to my calculator.


46 posted on 11/02/2012 5:54:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner

:: I expected them to cook the books down below 7% for Dear Ruler. ::

Ahhh, but they did! Yesterday, they announced revisions that indicated less jobs than were previously thought since February. There was no corresponding revision of the Index for those months. It was, most likely, 8.5 to 8.3 in that time.

Odd how the first big bump down (8.3 to 8.1) occurred in March, isn’t it?


47 posted on 11/02/2012 5:54:22 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Outraged At FLA

Obama still their man, though.


48 posted on 11/02/2012 5:54:30 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Hey, it either change or didn’t! It changed, really, not essentially! (semantics)


49 posted on 11/02/2012 5:54:41 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No worries. Give him a second term. He will fix it all, but good. You will see 20% unemployment and everyone broke with his total socialist destruction of America. Tuesday folks. Tuesday. Anyone who votes for him GETS what they ask for, and the end result will be nothing.


50 posted on 11/02/2012 5:55:11 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Scriptures clearly tell us we are in the last days, the end times. Christ is the only answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson