Posted on 11/02/2012 5:45:37 AM PDT by Travis McGee
Excellent article, Travis McGee! A radio appearance yesterday, and the PJ Media today! Thank you for all your hard work in trying to get the facts out regarding the treason surrounding Benghazi.
My nane hussein obama and al qaeda been bery, bery good...to me.
(Apologies to Jose Jiminez.)
I’m just pointing out how quickly your point would be reached by a responsible media.
1. Who decided to use only in-country assets?
2. Why?
The answer to 2 is that they had no CBA authority.
If the media asks the obvious first question, then they have to ask the obvious second question and Obama is exposed.
Great article and analysis! Thank you for your hard work in getting the facts out.
Yes, that’s correct. Obama “voted present” and left, is my guess. “Voting present” is not giving execute orders and CBA.
He “wrote off” the Benghazi detachment, hoped for the best, but totally willing to see them all die.
The major QRF forces waiting for the launch order in Sigonella bear silent witness to Obama’s willingness to see the Benghazi det be wiped out.
Non-optimal, a bump in the road.
We both know this wont happen unless we keep pounding every news site out there about the CBA. Im pounding every news site carrying this story.
At this point, General Petraeus would have to come clean as the “Big John Dean” of Benghazigate to redeem his life’s reputation.
I’m doing all I can, because this specific factoid about CBA means everybody can grasp it.
CBA can be the sharp new crowbar to pry open this rotten wreck of Benghazigate.
It’s provable, either way. Clear cut.
There’s major gaps in the cover stories.
Panetta: Dempsey, Ham, and I discussed it. Me decided not to go.
Ham: I was never ordered to Tom
Obama: I said go immediately (said during the second debate).
There’s major gaps in the cover stories.
Panetta: Dempsey, Ham, and I discussed it. We decided not to go.
Ham: I was never ordered to Tom
Obama: I said go immediately (said during the second debate).
Exactly. It is logic so clear that even MSM reporters can understand it.
If they will ask the CBA question, probably not. M
aybe Jake Tapper.
Great post. This is clear even for the morons and liars in the MSM.
Great post. This is clear even for the morons and liars in the MSM.
Very moving. In Obama speak, “Folks, let me be perfectly clear, YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN.”
For civilians like me, GRS - global response staff, a quick response team who holds down the fort for the short term, like a few hours.
It is hard to believe that 48% of my fellow Americans will vote for this slug of a leader.
Is there a legitimate (i.e., non-political in a domestic/election sense) reason NOT to issue the CBA? Granted, I'm having a hard time coming up with one myself, but strategically, is there any reason the CIA cats out of Tripoli might have been better to handle this operation than our guys out of Sigonella?
Commented. Tweeted and retweeted. Let’s roll, all y’all. Two minutes of your time to make this go viral.
Ping.
I smell perfectly timed propaganda, do you?
From the NY Times
WASHINGTON — Thirty-three years after the event, Hollywood has turned its attention to an episode that traumatized the United States for months: the seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran. But it has focused on what one participant called “a footnote”: the escape of 6 embassy personnel, not the 52 Americans who spent 14 months in captivity.
” No “stand down” order was ever given. Obama just didn’t order the rescue mission or grant CBA.
So you can see what a big like by omission it is to say, “The White House never ordered a stand-down.”
They didn’t have to! All they had to do was NOT affirmatively order the rescue or grant CBA.”
All one needs to know. Great job!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.