It always strikes me as funny that the ability to disconnect the sex act from it's natural consequences is considered a woman's right. It's really a man's freebee. Men are the primary beneficiaries of no consequence sex. Even when they're too stupid and lazy to avail themselves of readily means of prevention and inadvertently produce a child, men still get away without parenting or supporting their children frequently. Just funny how the elephant in the room is never mentioned. Women are really the stupid pawns of men when they buy into the storyline that using birth control and abortion is about their rights; it's about men's free lunch.
posted on 11/04/2012 5:54:07 AM PST
(The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
posted on 11/04/2012 6:21:03 AM PST
("Great things can be accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit." Ronald Reagan)
I get your point, but “men still get away without parenting or supporting their children frequently” brings up another. It seems like “Child Support Enforcement” is a difficult task when fully 40% of children are born out of wedlock. With 20% real unemployment, what percentage of the fathers actually have jobs? The way the deck is stacked now in favor of part time jobs and affirmative action for women in full-time jobs, men can barely support themselves, let alone their children. With the state as father, there is no reason for families to form.
posted on 11/04/2012 6:58:52 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson