Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado, Washington first states to legalize recreational pot
Chicago Tribune ^ | 11/07/2012 | Keith Coffman and Nicole Neroulias

Posted on 11/07/2012 9:01:24 AM PST by SeekAndFind

DENVER/SEATTLE (Reuters) - Colorado and Washington became the first U.S. states to legalize the possession and sale of marijuana for recreational use on Tuesday in defiance of federal law, setting the stage for a possible showdown with the Obama administration.

But another ballot measure to remove criminal penalties for personal possession and cultivation of recreational cannabis was defeated in Oregon, where significantly less money and campaign organization was devoted to the cause.

Supporters of a Colorado constitutional amendment legalizing marijuana were the first to declare victory, and opponents conceded defeat, after returns showed the measure garnering nearly 53 percent of the vote versus 47 percent against.

"Colorado will no longer have laws that steer people toward using alcohol, and adults will be free to use marijuana instead if that is what they prefer. And we will be better off as a society because of it," said Mason Tvert, co-director of the Colorado pro-legalization campaign.

The Drug Policy Alliance, a national advocacy group that backed the initiatives, said the outcome in Washington and Colorado reflected growing national support for liberalized pot laws, citing a Gallup poll last year that found 50 percent of Americans favored making it legal, versus 46 opposed.

Supporters of Washington state's pot legalization initiative declared victory after the Seattle Times and other media projected a win for marijuana proponents.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: cannabis; colorado; drugs; drugwar; marijuana; pot; warondrugs; washington; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2012 9:01:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Stupid is as stupid does...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-Elr5K2Vuo


2 posted on 11/07/2012 9:06:12 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Doesn’t this really illustrate the electorate which has emerged?

All the lies about caring about kids and education, while you legalize drugs to destroy our kids.


3 posted on 11/07/2012 9:07:27 AM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why the showdown with Obama? He is a “doobie brother” himself and worse. The showdown will be with the ATF and Justice department to justify their existence and gestapo tactics. Why the need for a billion rounds of hollow points and 100000 RPG’s, if drugs are legal? I am not for legalizing drugs, but to portray Obama as anti-drug is laughable.

No more busting down doors and shooting granny and her dog.


4 posted on 11/07/2012 9:14:02 AM PST by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

yessir I really see ZeeRow ChoomBama flexing Holders muscle to fight these States. /s


5 posted on 11/07/2012 9:17:40 AM PST by Gasshog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Showdown? This is what Obama wants! A nice drugged out permanently unemployed population is exactly what the socialist doctor ordered.


6 posted on 11/07/2012 9:18:22 AM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I don’t have any problem with legalizing this stuff. Living in socialist Europe I will give a word of warning to what will happen next though: drug legalization will probably result in more drug addicts emerging. What Repubs in America needs to do is stop any lifestyle subsidies towards these drug addicts. These subsidies will be proposed soon enough by social justice advocates.

If anyone wants to take illegal substances and mess up their own lives then thats fine by me. Just dont expect me to pay for others bad lifestyle choices.


7 posted on 11/07/2012 9:19:58 AM PST by Scottishlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In my life, I’ve seen far more damage done by people who drink alcohol on a regular basis than those that smoke weed on a regular basis. I’ve yet to come across convincing arguments for the continuing ban on marijuana.


8 posted on 11/07/2012 9:21:13 AM PST by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Most kids are not alcoholics, why would legalizing marijuana make them potheads?


9 posted on 11/07/2012 9:27:22 AM PST by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arbitrary.squid

Not a libertarian, but must agree...


10 posted on 11/07/2012 9:43:38 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
A nice drugged out permanently unemployed population

Relegalizing the mind-altering drug alcohol didn't lead to such a population - why would relegalizing marijuana do so?

11 posted on 11/07/2012 9:44:04 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

“Relegalizing the mind-altering drug alcohol didn’t lead to such a population - why would relegalizing marijuana do so?”

Because they are different drugs, and have different long-term effects on the human body?

Cheech and Chong was a caricature, but it was based on real people. I grew up in 1970’s California, and watched my mother and her friends smoke themselves into fecklessness.


12 posted on 11/07/2012 9:49:46 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

I think a lot of people watch too much tv and movies


13 posted on 11/07/2012 9:50:36 AM PST by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There go another couple million in population from California..


14 posted on 11/07/2012 9:50:49 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arbitrary.squid
that's because smoking weed and its affects are not as LOUD as those of alcohol, but just as dangerous, maybe more so...

you can have Dr high on weed come into the surgery and not suspect anything but have him take one drink, he's ushered out the door...

no one coming into the ER gets tested after an accident for weed...but even a slight smell will get you tested for alcohol usually...

15 posted on 11/07/2012 9:54:23 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“There go another couple million in population from California..”

Precious few of whom will be productive citizens.


16 posted on 11/07/2012 9:55:00 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (CHRISTOPHER WALKEN 2012: A cowbell in every pot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hmmm, maybe the libs will be too stoned to vote in the next election.


17 posted on 11/07/2012 9:58:51 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
but even a slight smell will get you tested for alcohol usually

So that brings me to a question. Is there a test that can be easily administered to find out if someone is "under the influence" of pot? If someone is doing his in their own home that's one thing, but if they are driving a vehicle or operating equipment (or operating on me for that matter) I would want to know if they are under the influence. My position is to toughen the laws and penalties for being under the influence. Especially now that pot is beginning to be legalized in certain states.

Is there a test like the breathalyzer that can detect pot usage?
18 posted on 11/07/2012 10:01:33 AM PST by copaliscrossing (Progressives are Socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scottishlibertarian

“What Repubs in America needs to do is stop any lifestyle subsidies towards these drug addicts.”

I have long argued against legalizing drugs on that very basis. If welfare were gone, I’d say fine. What happens next is two fold. First, more people who want to tune out and fire up. Two, more welfare for the “underclass” who are victims of the newly legal and even more abundant drugs that have “ruined” their lives.


19 posted on 11/07/2012 10:11:28 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arbitrary.squid

What about thew 2nd hand smoke???/ are they goin to charge $5 Tax on a joint?????


20 posted on 11/07/2012 10:44:32 AM PST by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd ,you get no further than the crowd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson