Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Turns Sure Victory into Defeat
http://townhall.com ^ | November 8, 2012 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 11/08/2012 5:43:21 AM PST by NKP_Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: NKP_Vet

There isn’t going to be a 2016 for America, and even if there was, the GOP would lose.


41 posted on 11/08/2012 7:04:47 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Progov
You are a moron and Herman Cain is about lining Herman Cain's pockets.

You can't win the GOP nomination, how will you win nationally ?

Where will you find your voters ?

What are you going to do, start a Tea Party? How's that worked out for one-and-done Allen West or various senate candidates like Akin, Mourdock, O'Donnell and others... easy wins that were thrown away?

But wait, you don't even want a real Tea Party because the actual Tea Party movement is SILENT on social issues.

42 posted on 11/08/2012 7:07:22 AM PST by newzjunkey (Obama thanks Pontius Pilate voter Freepers for making him president til 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Much worse than that this America is not Reagan’s 1980 America.


43 posted on 11/08/2012 7:08:00 AM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
Michael, your fathers GOP is not today's GOP...

Ronald Reagan'd be too much RINO for a substantial number of freepers.

He may not even not win the nomination.

Michael's a hack still riding on his adoptive father's good name and reputation. He tried selling access when Ronnie was in office.

44 posted on 11/08/2012 7:11:45 AM PST by newzjunkey (Obama thanks Pontius Pilate voter Freepers for making him president til 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Progov

I can’t agree on Herman Cain. His heart is right, and he’s as conservative as they come, but he has trouble thinking on his feet, a critically required skill for a president. His various misstatements were enough to disqualify him as a candidate for me.

But, still, a great man.


45 posted on 11/08/2012 7:12:36 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The communist got MORE BLACK VOTES than he did in 2012! In otherwords where were all the black pastors and their flocks that said they wouldn’t vote for him when he came out for queer “marriage”. Answer: They don’t exist. Blacks vote racist. They voted for him because they think he’s one of them, makes no difference at all that he was raised by affluent muslims and whites and has absolutely nothing in common with the black man in America. The vast majority of blacks are too dumbed down by the democratic party to realize that. The ones that do have a mind of their own and call the communist for what he is are labeled uncle toms and belittled by 99% of other blacks. Skin color trumps everything else for these people. Well I should say skin color and being a welfare daddy leftist. They could care less if the fake and fraud now claims it’s OK for two men to get “married”. As long as that welfare check and free cell phone keeps coming in he has their vote.


46 posted on 11/08/2012 7:15:37 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The slut battle did help Dems. Was pointless and Rush showed his age.

It’s a post Christian country (sadly) and Republicans are running like it’s Norman Rockwell. Morality is resented these days.

Focusing only on economic issues is where we win the majority of voters. For now.

Four more years of millions added to disability and food stamp roles, might be too late by 2016 to do anything. Economy collapsing from the debt will
accelerate dependency.


47 posted on 11/08/2012 7:18:12 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Sad but true.

Black Christians complained about gay marriage but lined up and supported Obama. Big time support.

They will vote skin color in DETROIT level garbage status. They’d do the same to the entire country. Just give up that demographic. West and Love lost. Blacks don’t want anything more than handouts.


48 posted on 11/08/2012 7:20:56 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

A number of women I have talked to have identified Mourdoch’s and Akin’s statements on rape to be a deciding factor.

We need more discipline in our candidates. A lot more.


49 posted on 11/08/2012 7:21:55 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Social conservatives make it tough to pivot to the general election.

You don't think the social fabric of a country isn't tied into economics or foreign policy you are delusional

Countries fall from within

Tear down the mores of society and you end up disintegrating

You really think the abortion loving homosexual championing fools are going to vote for economic and foreign policy sanity --they are "government take care of us" idiots
50 posted on 11/08/2012 7:24:28 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
The communist got MORE BLACK VOTES than he did in 2012

You don't think vote fraud in those black districts may have been in play big time this time around

But I realized decades ago --in the late 60s that the real problem is the WHITE LIBERAL --they have the power in the MSM and schools

Blacks are only a symptom of white liberal policies
51 posted on 11/08/2012 7:29:48 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
You're right. They were correct on their positions on the issues, but they made boneheaded statements in the middle of a campaign and that cost us two sure Senate seats. We need politically savvy candidates who will know what to say and how to say it in a way that doesn't piss off over 50% of the voting electorate. Yes, I know Mourdock was a Tea Party darling, but I'm sorry, he said a stupid thing and that blew the campaign up. We can't have candidates that make those kind of gaffes, because whereas the ‘Rats can have the media bury their gaffes, our candidates have to be always on their guard not to say stupid things.
52 posted on 11/08/2012 7:32:14 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

“A number of women I have talked to have identified Mourdoch’s and Akin’s statements on rape to be a deciding factor.”

So they voted against Romney even though he didn’t have anything to do with the statements? They obviously lack critical thinking skills.

I wonder if they had any opinion regarding Benghazi . . .

. . . and how do they feel about a president that believes it’s quite normal to leave an infant [no matter how she is conceived] to die alone in a cold, dark closet . . .

. . . and that it’s okay to pierce their head or burn or poison them so they’ll be delivered dead? That’s the person they voted for? What a tragedy! Some people are beyond disgusting!

Speaking of disgusting, wonder what they think about all the leftists who are thanking whatever it is they worship (I’m positive it isn’t God) for hurricane Sandy?


53 posted on 11/08/2012 7:40:18 AM PST by Heart of Georgia ("Together we will unite America and get this done" - Paul Ryan - August 11, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour
So why did he come in 2 million votes below what the pathetic McCain was able to garner in 2008?

Because, after holding their noses for McCain, they realized that Romney, a liberal, signaled that the Republican party would only preserve the [Obama] Status Quo.
IOW, they weren't fooled by his rhetoric, by his waking up one day and deciding to be conservative [because he wanted to run for president] -- the GOP got exactly what it deserved for anointing him [long before the primaries] and pushing him on us through unsavory means: remember the VA delegate bus incident? remember the three states where Romney was declared primary winner with a later 'whoops'? remember the Ron Paul supporters winning their primaries [or at least portions thereof] through some shrewd rule-using only to be denied due retroactively placed rule changes?

The GOP got exactly what it deserved.

54 posted on 11/08/2012 7:41:34 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia

They’re Democrate and their critical thinking skills are less than impressive. They decide on the basis of emotions and those emotions are easily led by someone who knows how to do it.

My feeling is that we should have picked someone who was very charismatic for the slot as this approach by the electorate is going to be come more common.

But we through out Sarah, Rick Perry early on and there was no one left who could really turn on the charm.


55 posted on 11/08/2012 7:46:50 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Progov

“Herman Cain has the right idea..”Time for a new party”.
Well Herman, I’m all in.”

I’m not. And I happen to like Cain.


56 posted on 11/08/2012 7:50:51 AM PST by Heart of Georgia ("Together we will unite America and get this done" - Paul Ryan - August 11, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
First they tore each other to shreds in a bitter primary, smearing their eventual nominee in debates as a rich, uncaring profiteer who put working people out on the street and shipped their jobs overseas.

While the nominee slimed far better conservatives than himself in order to win the nomination because 'it was his turn'. It takes two to tango, Michael.

57 posted on 11/08/2012 7:50:59 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
You can't win the GOP nomination, how will you win nationally ?

Ha, the GOP's been running loser candidates (McCain and Romney), so if the GOP's "best winners" are that much of losers what does that say about the party?
You forget that Romney wasn't offered, he was actively pushed. Remember the fiascoes at the RNC? Remember the primaries where Romney was declared winner, with a later 'we were wrong'? Remember the Ron Paul supporters winning delegates through some good rules-lawyering, only to be denied when the results came out?

58 posted on 11/08/2012 7:53:20 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chimera; buffaloguy
A number of women I have talked to have identified Mourdoch’s and Akin’s statements on rape to be a deciding factor.

Nonsense! How is it that the two states those two represented both went for Romney? And by a very significant margin.

59 posted on 11/08/2012 7:55:02 AM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Midterms are two years away.

Conservatives are tired of being shoved to the back of the GOP bus!

60 posted on 11/08/2012 7:55:51 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson