Oops, last sentence should be: But don’t pretend that fraud is NOT a signficant part of urban Dem voting percentages.
However, look at the aggregate polling results (how people said they intended to vote) prior to the election, and the actual vote counts (how they voted).
If there has been fraud on a scale sufficient to change the results, the difference would be clearly apparent.
It's not, and "vote fraud" was not a significant factor in the outcome of the presidential election in any state.
If someone wishes to believe otherwise, that's not a problem.
Unless that belief causes then to expect they can get a different result next time by preventing the fraud that was not the cause of the result this time.
Then, IMO it's a big problem.
I wondered about that.