1. Petraeus was going to spill the beans and do the honorable thing and tell the truth about what happened at Benghazi. 0bama gave him a choice, resign or end up like Jimmy Hoffa.
2. Petraeus refused to cover for Hussein and the Beast, so he resigned and may avoid testifying.
3. Petraeus refuses to serve under a traitor like 0bama, so he resigns.
4. 0bama can't risk anyone with a shred of honor being in that position, and now he has "more flexibility" and the purge has begun, so 0bama can consolidate his dictatorial powers.
There is so much fraud and deceit surrounding 0bama and his regime, there's absolutely no way I'm taking their explanation at face value.
Never! I don't trust the man at all. I'm suspecting more and more these election results. Mitt Romney was far from my choice (actually he was second from last)as the nominee but I'm thinking more and more that he was cheated BIG TIME and legally won.
I do NOT trust Obama.
As *I* recall, it was Sens Clinton, Reid, Obama , et al who took out the full-page ad in the NYT calling him "General Betray-us" *before* the surge in Iraq happened. That he later worked with these same people had *me* questioning the clarity of his judgement THEN.
He willingly served under Obama knowing how Obama felt about him personally, and about his missions. He should have refused SECDEF from the start, were his integrity as high as many here assumed it was...