Posted on 11/09/2012 5:54:14 PM PST by dynachrome
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.wnd.com ...
Rock and roll Friday!
Live we are. Petraeus and the honey trap on tap.
In for the show. Would have missed it without the ping. Still getting used to the new time slot.
Doc is comparing Rommel’s end to how Petraeus ended his career.
“new time slot’
Me too.
Who’s the host he’s talking about?
I could use a bit of fresh air right now!!!! And common sense! :)
Ah wallbanger. We’ve got Jim Villanucci in my neck of the woods advocating the same thing. Used to be sort of conservative, now just a gary johnson thumping liberaltarian.
Wallbanger is now pro-amnesty.
“secure the border”. yeah, right. Tell me another one pinocchio.
Also, they’re floating Marco Rubio now because he’s hispanic. Evidently race pandering is okay if you’re on the right.
Doc S. is sounding pretty good with the new syndicator.
Won’t work. I saw on FR somewhere that Rubio is considered white by the la ratsa types because he is actually Spanish ancestory rather than being mexican, honduran, etc.
Savage is a rock. The others have “evolved”.
I hope he talks about the suspected voter fraud that put Obama in the WH in 2012 and the suspcious resignation.
I wish he’d talk about the Fraud.
I looked at the St. Lucie results, unfathomable.
Well over 100%, most in the 120-160% turnout.
http://www.slcelections.com/Pdf%20Docs/2012%20General/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORT.pdf
I can’t believe he’s not talking about the San Fran residents paying for sex changes either. I figured he’d hit that also.
Will the Dems start in with the “Betray Us” horsesheet again?
Will the Dems start in with the “Betray Us” horsesheet again?
Why is it streaming Jerry Doyle, and why is Michael no longer on FM 104.7 Pittsburgh Talk Radio.
sorry, these results are so shocking to me (St. Lucie more at link i posted)
Reg Cards % turnout
4815 6550 136.03%
1849 2352 127.20%
1996 2566 128.56%
2694 3929 145.84%
2756 4378 158.85%
590 719 121.86%
2000 2804 140.20%
4460 6215 139.35%
2871 3663 127.59%
2948 4081 138.43%
3665 5609 153.04%
3181 4670 146.81%
3202 4119 128.64%
1835 2219 120.93%
2556 2909 113.81%
1024 1443 140.92%
2737 3631 132.66%
3840 5395 140.49%
3447 4475 129.82%
1832 2513 137.17%
3555 4847 136.34%
4122 5557 134.81%
1796 2568 142.98%
561 785 139.93%
1704 2748 161.27%
379 557 146.97%
1757 2313 131.64%
1720 2301 133.78%
4290 5542 129.18%
1396 1908 136.68%
1793 2612 145.68%
1871 2170 115.98%
3875 5536 142.86%
4701 7409 157.60%
2653 4406 166.08%
2450 3511 143.31%
If he refuses to testify, he will be a hero to the marxists.
After all, it’s just the eeeevil rightwingers trying to destroy our marxist/muzzie messiah.
Well, with a messiah like borat hussein, you get miracles like that/s
“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable—what then?”
Indeed “the One” is “the One”.
1984?
Hannity... water carrier. Maybe he boned a publicist.
Big Brother approves of your post.
Thanks.
Jews are some of the oldest europeans in North America. They came to New Mexico in the 1500’s after they were expelled from Spain, some two centuries before the birth of the United States.
The problem with the 1986 "reform" was simply that IT WAS NOT ENFORCED! The borders were not enforced.. the law was ignored by government and business.
We had miles of threads about this. The "reform" granted legal status to far more than was declared during the debate and as the years passed millions more poured through the border with the full knowledge and approval of government and business. They were all here illegally with the full knowledge and welcome of government and business.
The SSA has file called the Earnings Suspense File (ESF) which documents every SSN earning that did not match the SS master file. Nothing is deleted from the ESF unless the earnings are transferred to a valid SSN in the SS master files. Records in the ESF go back to 1937.
FIGURE 1: STATUS OF THE EARNINGS SUSPENSE FILE (Tax Years 1937-2000) in CONGRESSIONAL RESPONSE REPORT Social Security Administration Benefits Related to Unauthorized Work, A-03-03-23053 (March, 2003), shows some interesting things about the Earnings Suspense File (ESF).
It shows that following the 1986 amnesty and "reform" there was a decrease in volume of records in the file.
Well, the SSA does not delete earnings statements from the ESF unless it can transfer the earnings to a valid SSN. Amnesty -- by any name -- creates valid SSNs and the SSA will transfer past earnings data submitted with bogus SSNs to valid SSNs. It helps SS for the ILLEGALS to have their old W-2s showing the bogus SSNs they used.
To the best of my knowledge it was a 2004 law that finally required SS benefits be earned with authorized work from 2004 on. ILLEGAL aliens can get SS benefits based upon all bogus SSNs prior to 2004 once they become legal "guest workers," or through their own efforts they become legal and acquire a valid SSN -- or get amnesty.
Immigration "reform" will likely delete the 2004 requirement -- if it was ever enforced anyway.
Funniest one-liners ever..
"Take my wife... please!" Henny Youngman
"I don't like to criticize other talk show hosts." Michael Savage.
Which city in particular are you looking for?
I always found it interesting that Judah Benjamin was Secretary of War/State of the Confederacy.
http://www.civilwarhome.com/benjaminbio.htm
Actually, I need a list as I'm inquiring on behalf of some relatives as well.
we gone. gotta get some sleep. see ya on the flip side!
When I was in the Army in the 1950s you had to be a legal resident to join. I hear people speak of illegal immigrants who served in the U.S. military . . . .
To serve was a proud and honorable way for LEGAL immigrants to gain citizenship.
Are ILLEGALs now permitted to join? I know that they are required to register with the Selective Service System with no risk of being exposed as illegal.
Hannity is a turd. never liked him and now I know why
Barry is ignoring the Law on Selective Service.
Rules are: 18-26, Illegal Immigrant or Citizen/Resident MUST sign up. If NOT, may affect citizenship, Denial of Federal Jobs/Benefits/Loans. If you are here and older than that age group, BUT came here during that age group and didn’t sign up, the above also applies to you. If you are here and illegal less than a year, until you hit the year in the States, you don’t have to sign up.
Those on a student Visa are exempt as well as those Legal Residents whom we have a treating with their home Country that forbids service in the Military.
Those that are Illegal have had the opportunity to enlist and become Legal. They choose not to obey. Freebies are what they want.
I check the compliance stats. No compliance for Illegals (% wise). I believe that last stat I read on American Males (citizens complying with the SS Law was around 95%)
You can get free Savage podcasts on KSFO tho only a week's worth.
That only one aspect of "comprehensive immigration reform" will be enforced.. amnesty. ILLEGALs will still pour in by the tens of millions -- and be welcomed and covered for until the next "comprehensive immigration reform" when they will be given amnesty. Repeat.
I am fond of posting a quote by Lincoln (slightly updated):
. . . You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." [it won't fall but it has to] become all one thing, or all the other.
We are nearing that crisis and IMO our military has to choose sides.
We are. Barry is NO Lincoln.
I heard a black caller into Hannity the other day congratulate him for being a humble and magnanimous loser. Sean lapped it up.
Any criminal (IMHO), convicted of ID theft or fraud, fake age on their DL (for drinking), would have standing to sue the Govt. (state or fed) for unequal enforcement of the law.
Any Illegal that is here and been working is either: using fake docs (felonies), working under the table (tax fraud). There can be nothing else.
Those are felonies for you and I.
The key word is "loser."
I don’t have cable and I quit listening to his radio show about a year ago. (those screeching libs he has to have on to “balance”, shoot does MSM care about “balance”?) Sometimes I turn in on, and after a little bit, her comes Juan Williams and I shut it off. I don’t need the stress. Listen to Levin and Savage.
And there has to be already legal associations at work on the unequal enforcement. That'd be the 14th Amendment I believe. The lefties cling to that Amendment and the commerce clause.
I'll try to find something on the 'Net over the weekend.
Equal Protection Clause. I heard someone, on the airways say that for that you had to have “standing”. Get prosecuted first, then sue. (the DOJ, ACLU, Mexican Consulate and other various Countries that encourage their citizens to violate our sovereignty will file Friend of the Court briefs and a lib judge will throw it out).
Just to irritate them and to have it on the Public Record, if I had the extra money, I file a suit against them for a number of things. (i’m not a criminal just to make that clear).
I’ve always said DMX (dog abuser and convicted of fraud to giving a fake name at the hospital) could sue for the violation of his rights on the fake name enforcement (Federal suit, not against AZ). Here in AZ, Illegal Immigrants greatly impact the ER’s and can give a fake name/id and they don’t go after them.
I think someone asked Levin about that either having to do with Obamacare or Barry’s irregularities, and he (Mark) if I’m not mistaken, pooed the use of the Equal Protection Clause for that.
Illegal Immigrants and all the rest that are exempt from Obamacare is, IMHO, a violation of the Clause.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.