Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeoWindhorse
'Cards cast' does not mean that there was that many voters. The ballots were so long on many cases that they had to turn in multiple parts. Many people did not even finish the down ballot votes, they simply turned in the POTUS part (and whatever happened to be on the same 'card' as POTUS.

The 141% turnout, etc stories are all based on false premises. Does this mean there was not fraud? NO, of course not, but these over 100% turnout stories are bogus.

The danger to pushing this line is obvious, as it will make people hyping it look like fools, and thus discredit legit reports of fraud, as well as the fundamental principles that these people beieve in.

35 posted on 11/10/2012 2:35:31 PM PST by Abiotic (The ship of democracy, which has weathered all storms, may sink through the mutiny of those on board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Abiotic
hyping it look like fools, and thus discredit legit reports of fraud

This is why we need to have proof of everything we see. I would contend that whenever you go to the polls whether you are a poll watcher or as a voter you should bring a small video camera (preferably one that adds a date and time stamp) to record any shenanigans you may see.

I would add that you should have the type of camera that will automatically send what you record to a remote location. That way if the powers that be confiscate it you will still have a record.

Also keep in mind that many police unions are part of SEIU so your evidence may be "inadvertently" erased so make several copies before you turn them over

48 posted on 11/10/2012 3:16:21 PM PST by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson