Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health-Care Law Spurs a Shift to Part-Time Workers
Wall St. Journal ^ | November 4, 2012 | JULIE JARGON, LOUISE RADNOFSKY and ALEXANDRA BERZON

Posted on 11/10/2012 2:58:24 PM PST by grundle

Some low-wage employers are moving toward hiring part-time workers instead of full-time ones to mitigate the health-care overhaul's requirement that large companies provide health insurance for full-time workers or pay a fee.

Several restaurants, hotels and retailers have started or are preparing to limit schedules of hourly workers to below 30 hours a week. That is the threshold at which large employers in 2014 would have to offer workers a minimum level of insurance or pay a penalty starting at $2,000 for each worker.

Pillar Hotels & Resorts this summer began to focus more on hiring part-time workers among its 5,500 employees, said Chief Executive Chris Russell. The company has 210 franchise hotels, under the Sheraton, Fairfield Inns, Hampton Inns and Holiday Inns brands.

"The tendency is to say, 'Let me fill this position with a 40-hour-a-week employee.' "Mr. Russell said. "I think we have to think differently."

Pillar offers health insurance to employees who work 32 hours a week or more, but only half take it, and Mr. Russell wants to limit his exposure to rising health-care costs. He said he planned to pursue new segments of the population, such as senior citizens, to find workers willing to accept part-time employment.

CKE Restaurants Inc., parent of the Carl's Jr. and Hardee's burger chains, began two months ago to hire part-time workers to replace full-time employees who left, said Andy Puzder, CEO of the Carpinteria, Calif., company. CKE, which is owned by private-equity firm Apollo Management LP, offers limited-benefit plans to all restaurant employees, but the federal government won't allow those policies to be sold starting in 2014 because of low caps on payouts.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services said the administration didn't believe the law would substantially affect employment

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; democrats; economy; elections; fubo; fudemocrats; obama; obamacare; obamanomics; obamasized; obamasizing; ownit; socialisthealthcare

1 posted on 11/10/2012 2:58:28 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

People get what they vote for, I guess


2 posted on 11/10/2012 3:06:05 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I was traveling last week and overheard two men talking at the Atlanta airport. One was saying he has a business that employees 18 people and he has already told them that as of March they would all be fired and would become “1099s”. Said he loves his employees but has no more margin for expenses. Is this what Obama really wanted? Is this what idiot Americans really wanted? My frustration is getting the best of me.


3 posted on 11/10/2012 3:06:08 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The people voted for this.....as moochelle probably thinks “ let them eat peas “


4 posted on 11/10/2012 3:10:22 PM PST by Popman (November 7th...will be a good dafor America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Cheaper to get 60 hours from 2 people than 40 hours from one.

Using their noggin.

More time for the bama voters to stay home and smoke their pot


5 posted on 11/10/2012 3:11:57 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Yep, I think this might be exactly what they wanted.


6 posted on 11/10/2012 3:13:32 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I used to think obama simply didn’t understand the implications of his policies, but no longer. It’s impossible for him not to understand them. His actions are deliberate - obamacare no matter what the consequences, because if people need help because of bad capitalists who won’t pay them, the more government for them. He really wants a centralized economy, there care be no other conclusion.


7 posted on 11/10/2012 3:14:25 PM PST by gotribe (He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This means that the standard will be that the individual needs two twenty-hour jobs. And then HHS will redefine full-time work as anything over eight hours a week, which will require that the individual needs to find five part-time jobs a week!!


8 posted on 11/10/2012 3:15:28 PM PST by StevieB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Obama will just keep dropping the benchmark until every small business goes broke or pays off the local democrat party mafia.


9 posted on 11/10/2012 3:16:24 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Strange how paranoia can link up with reality now and then." -- Philip K. Dick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The Obama objective is not jobs but to create dependence on government. Parasites vote Democrat.


10 posted on 11/10/2012 3:17:19 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Two things jump out at me as I read through this:

1. Not only are employees going to be limited to 30 hours a week, but they themselves will now have to take on the cost of either getting their own insurance (on a work schedule that's only 25% less than that of a full-time job) or paying the $2,000 fine themselves.

2. This comment really caught my eye: He said he planned to pursue new segments of the population, such as senior citizens, to find workers willing to accept part-time employment. Taking this one step further, what he's also saying is that a prospective employee who can demonstrate that he/she is already insured under another form of coverage (spouse's insurance, Medicare for older folks, etc.) will be a highly-prized commodity in the labor market once ObamaCare is fully implemented.

The unforeseen consequences of this kind of nonsense are going to be unbelievable.

11 posted on 11/10/2012 3:18:40 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
I don't think Obama does understand his policies. Obamacare was written by the insurance industry when it was drafted as a House bill back in 2009. None of the members of Congress who voted for it even read it.

Anything more complicated than the sports pages of USA Today is like molecular physics to most people in Washington.

12 posted on 11/10/2012 3:21:04 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The reality of the matter is that it’ll take $15-$20 a hour to pay part time employees more that their takehome on the dole. Been dealing with this for years. Many won’t work part time because it nets them less than food assistance, housing assistance, etc nets them weekly.

This is the reality of our economy. Unless you’re at the top of your profession it doesn’t pay for many to work. And you can forget about them working their way from the bottom up.


13 posted on 11/10/2012 3:22:12 PM PST by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

MEMORANDUM

From:Mitt Romney
To: America

Subj: Miss me yet?


14 posted on 11/10/2012 3:22:20 PM PST by ScottinVA (I've never been more disgusted with American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sbMKE

yep.

When the money runs out for food stamps and section 8....


15 posted on 11/10/2012 3:25:31 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I am guessing the people who now can’t get insurance through their employer will now have to go to a state exchange ?


16 posted on 11/10/2012 3:26:06 PM PST by HangingTuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sbMKE
That's why so many employers are thrilled to hire immigrants -- legal and illegal -- from Mexico and other Latin American countries.

This country could address an awful lot of its issues -- from unemployment to illegal immigration -- simply by stopping this idiocy of paying able-bodied Americans not to work.

17 posted on 11/10/2012 3:26:32 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Agreed. They want this to happen then all the part time or laid off people will HAVE to use Obamacare to get healthcare.

This was all about the socialists creating more slaves to keep them in power.


18 posted on 11/10/2012 3:37:05 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

The Obama objective is not jobs but to create dependence on government. Parasites vote Democrat.


Yes this is always the goal.


19 posted on 11/10/2012 3:38:00 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Don’t be surprised if the employment statistics look pretty good for the next few months. We are seeing a lot of job losses, but some of those will be replaced 2-1 with two part timers. This will cause a drop in unemployment. However, it is not a real improvement in the economy.


20 posted on 11/10/2012 3:41:28 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangingTuff

“I am guessing the people who now can’t get insurance through their employer will now have to go to a state exchange ?”

Many states refuse to do an exchange and have passed laws against it.


21 posted on 11/10/2012 3:51:45 PM PST by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Obamacare was a poisoned pill. It’s meant to be SO awful that people will just say screw it and go on to the real goal, single payer government healthcare....


22 posted on 11/10/2012 3:52:29 PM PST by Kozak (The means of defence again.t foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HangingTuff

A lot of states are opting out of the exchange, so it will drive people right to the federal exchange - just as Obama envisioned.

This is a welcome development to the regime.


23 posted on 11/10/2012 3:59:46 PM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
I was traveling last week and overheard two men talking at the Atlanta airport. One was saying he has a business that employees 18 people and he has already told them that as of March they would all be fired and would become “1099s".

Wait until they learn one of the particular "joys" of self-employment: paying both the "employer" and "employee" portions of social security taxes. And if they are young enough, they'll probably never see it come back to them.

I've instituted a new personal rule. I am often a sounding board for people's problems. From now on, anyone who complains to me about stuff like this will get a question in return: Who did you vote for? (unless I already know the answer). If the answer is Obama, I will tell them they've received what they asked for and to stop bothering me.
24 posted on 11/10/2012 4:12:17 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services said the administration didn't believe the law would substantially affect employment

Most likely it won't...
Dropping a 40hr to 2 20hr = 2 jobs....+1
The +1 helps the layoff numbers - filling in the viods

The key indicator to watch is hours worked dropping
(just think of all the free time to go biking with the kids so they won't get fat - ugh

25 posted on 11/10/2012 4:14:11 PM PST by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
I was traveling last week and overheard two men talking at the Atlanta airport. One was saying he has a business that employees 18 people and he has already told them that as of March they would all be fired and would become “1099s”. Said he loves his employees but has no more margin for expenses. Is this what Obama really wanted? Is this what idiot Americans really wanted? My frustration is getting the best of me.

Converting all the employees to 1099 would be the best thing that ever happened, and the greatest way to go Galt. If a person is a 1099 employee, they are an independant contractor who has to file their own social security, own withholdings, their own taxes, and their own healthcare. They become independent capitalists. Then they will really learn what it takes to run a business, and it isn't unicorns and skittles. This would be a mass conversion to fiscal conservatism.

26 posted on 11/10/2012 4:15:03 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

One was saying he has a business that employees 18 people and he has already told them that as of March they would all be fired and would become “1099s”.


This is very real. Ask any CPA who advises small businesses and you will hear bone chilling stories of what is to come. Obamacare is going to hammer a weak economy. Naturally the marxists will want to amend o-care because it is going to blow a huge hole in the “budget”. We will be back to trillion dollar deficits even after cutting defense and raising taxes.


27 posted on 11/10/2012 4:30:44 PM PST by lodi90 (Born free, won't die in chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This frustrating thing is this story broke a couple weeks ago.

It was a major fumble by Romney not putting the Olive Garden cutting hours story front and center in his campaign. The sick part is the Olive Garden CEO is a black guy who is a big Obama donor.

It all dovetailed perfectly to hammer the kenyan with and they didn’t use it.


28 posted on 11/10/2012 4:32:59 PM PST by lodi90 (Born free, won't die in chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Obamacare was written by the insurance industry . . .

Source?

29 posted on 11/10/2012 4:36:16 PM PST by Jacquerie (Once a republic, now a democratic tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012; TheGrimReaper
I was traveling last week and overheard two men talking at the Atlanta airport. One was saying he has a business that employees 18 people and he has already told them that as of March they would all be fired and would become “1099s”.

That's going to come back and bite him hard if he does that. It will cost him more in penalties and payroll taxes if they turn him in to the IRS.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but he would fundamentally have to change his business structure to make it work and avoid the very real possibility that the government would crack down on him with huge financial hits.

The definition of a 1099 contractor is that they can work for as many clients as they wish, and the client can only tell them what the project completed needs to be, and it is up to the 1099 to figure out how, when, how long the project will take. The business cannot give them any directions, or demand when and where to show up to work, and also the 1099 cannot be in supervisory roles or signers of any company documents.

Also, if he (the business man) gives them one, single, solitary thing (pen, paper, business cards, etc) it shows the 1099 is really a W2 employee and then things really get ugly. He would have to write-write all agreements with his former employees to show that they are 1099, and that is usually at a flat hourly rate (or project rate). They would get paid out of A/P, and the 1099s are responsible for all of their own commercial insurance (specifically workers comp, and E&O liability), as well as reporting, and paying of all of their various federal taxes to the government.

And believe me, my company, we completely feel his pain, we are grandfathered in to our insurance, we can't change it, because then we would not be in compliance with the various laws, we're right at 20 employees ourselves, so we really can't grow, because then we're forced into the insurance and fines by the government if our employees decline our coverage.

We were in mourning last week, it's criminal what they are doing to small businesses, we used to be the backbone of the economy, now we're pariahs being taxes and regulated to death.

30 posted on 11/10/2012 4:50:47 PM PST by RikaStrom ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom

Exactly! And to be sure there will be a cottage industry of lawyers springing up overnight to sue for retroactive workers comp coverage, overtime, etc.


31 posted on 11/10/2012 4:58:11 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("Our president ... makes big speeches packed full of little ideas" Charles C. W. Cooke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HangingTuff
I am guessing the people who now can’t get insurance through their employer will now have to go to a state exchange ?

More likely they would have to go to the federal exchange. A lot of states can't fund a state exchange. Also the people will need to be told that it is up to them to find coverage, if they chose not to, and believe me some will, thinking that the tax fine will be less than the coverage, that will only be the first year. For every year you don't have insurance the fine rises substantially.

IIRC, the last training session I had on this was that for a family of 4, who makes 20k annually (poverty level) they have to pay nothing for the annual premiums, it's all funded by the employer/govt.

If the family of 4 makes 40K annually, they have to pay (I think it is 6% of what the annual premiums would be - but don't quote me on that) and they employer/govt would have to pay the rest of the premium.

And if the family of 4 makes 80K annually, they would pay 9.7% and the employer/govt would pay the rest of the annual premiums.

I have the actually numbers at work, not at the house. If you send me a FRmail, I will remember to look them up for you on Monday.

Now all of this is moot, if you have group insurance and you are under 50 eligible employees (people working 30 hours or more a week) and you haven't had 50 eligible employees working for you at any time during the last 12 months.

It's a freaking nightmare.

I know some insurance companies that are trying to get a "concierge" service for various industries. That way the the doctors/hospitals would work for the industry, and you would pay an annual premium (staggered based on comprehensiveness of the plan most likely) that would be cheaper to utilize. This idea is not currently illegal under the disaster that is Obamacare.

32 posted on 11/10/2012 5:05:25 PM PST by RikaStrom ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Make sure that you deduct all that you can legally deduct.


33 posted on 11/10/2012 5:06:27 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Exactly! And to be sure there will be a cottage industry of lawyers springing up overnight to sue for retroactive workers comp coverage, overtime, etc.

Oh yeah. I shudder at the thought of it all. I did hear one interesting tidbit about the possibilities of have HSA (Health Savings Accounts) and using them instead of insurance. Currently that hasn't been outlawed yet, but it would require that an employee take the initiative and have money put in towards it for future emergencies, and they can earn interest. The downside is that they are talking about capping how much money you can have in the account.

It's certainly caused no end of headaches when you try to figure it out... and perhaps a need to invest in spirits and fine wines. :-)

34 posted on 11/10/2012 5:13:37 PM PST by RikaStrom ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Not only are employees going to be limited to 30 hours a week, but they themselves will now have to take on the cost of either getting their own insurance (on a work schedule that's only 25% less than that of a full-time job) or paying the $2,000 fine themselves.

First you lose hours and are now a part-time employee, with less pay coming in! Second, you have to either pay for medical insurance out of your own pocket, or pay a $2,000 fine, which you cannot afford either! How that change working out for you obamma lovers?!

35 posted on 11/10/2012 5:35:55 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: randita

That’s what I’m afraid will happen to my family. My husband works for a hotel/resort. The insurance is soo good, but sooo pricey! It is expected to go up so high we can’t afford it. The idea of having to go on Obamacare is unbelievable. I think I’d rather die then do that.


36 posted on 11/10/2012 5:39:13 PM PST by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: grundle

             

37 posted on 11/10/2012 6:13:24 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
I don’t believe you can just put people on 1099’s. There are requirements in the tax code that must be met to qualify for independent contractor status and just putting employees on 1099s ain’t gonna meet these rules.
38 posted on 11/10/2012 6:28:10 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grundle

LOL. Now these Obamugabe supporters are getting their hours cut....

There are plenty of these cultists working where I do. Tons of Holder’s “people”.

I will be smiling big time if our boss decides to cut them all to 20 hours a week.


39 posted on 11/10/2012 6:39:26 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Yes, well, a lot of us are going to stop spending money in order to try and starve the Obamugabe Government Beast.

So maybe there won’t be a whole lot of hiring going on at all...legal or illegal.


40 posted on 11/10/2012 6:45:24 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom; SeaDragon

Write-write should be re-write

Dang fat fingers


41 posted on 11/10/2012 6:46:59 PM PST by RikaStrom ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle

............................................


42 posted on 11/11/2012 1:44:47 AM PST by Tzimisce (Will there be anything to fight for in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom

I don’t know all the details about 1099 status. I was simply reporting what I overheard. I think lots of businesses will also start paying under the table. We all lose.


43 posted on 11/11/2012 5:28:01 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The lessons of Hoover’s Recession and FDR’s Great Depression are intentionally mistaught. Who will tell the people?

A black Walmart employee told me the other day - let the rich pay, they can afford it. I sure cant.

Will he relate his lowered work hours or unemployment to actions taken on his “behalf” by caring Democrats. Nope.


44 posted on 11/11/2012 5:41:01 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Yep. The Obamanation wants all of us dependent on the government rather than dependent on God. He said so way back in the ‘08 campaign.


45 posted on 11/11/2012 3:03:36 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore
Many states refuse to do an exchange and have passed laws against it.

The farther from November 6th we've gone, the more I'm starting to see the cracks in the Democrat's firewall. I'm really beginning to believe there was a massive, organized effort to defraud the election process, and your comment made me realize something...

When Obamacare passed, over 70% of Floridians were against it and called for Tallahassee to pass a law stating we won't comply. It was put in as a Constitutional ballot initiative (Amendment 1) but went down in flames on Election day.

In addition, despite Obama winning the popular vote by a hair in Florida, an overwhelming majority of precincts voted to keep existing or bring in new Republican state senators and congressmen. It's almost as if they focused solely on defrauding the Presidential ballot and the amendment for Obamacare but left the rest of the ballot alone.

You may be able to boil the pot slowly to cook the frog, but at some point the frog's going to realize that something's up and is going to get mad as Hell. I think we're going to see widespread violence in America before New Years.

46 posted on 11/11/2012 4:56:32 PM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"...stopping this idiocy of paying able-bodied Americans not to work..."

Boy. That is kind of the nut of the problem, eh?

47 posted on 11/11/2012 7:42:24 PM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grundle

48 posted on 11/12/2012 8:20:28 AM PST by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Look up Liz Fowler. She was health care counsel or some stupid adviser to Senator Bachus. She was a policy wonk at Wellpoint.


49 posted on 11/12/2012 6:18:59 PM PST by erikm88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the law always that if a person worked 30 hours or more the company had to pay benefits. So what do the brainiacs in congress and the white house do? The put the magic number at 30. Like companies couldn’t figure that out.


50 posted on 11/12/2012 9:07:48 PM PST by Terry Mross (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson