Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Agreed. There will end up being a significant drop from 2004 to 2008 AND 2012 especially adding in pop growth.


4 posted on 11/11/2012 3:49:49 PM PST by Reagan‹berAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan√úberAlles

I ran 2004 numbers as well, and factored in growth of the voting age population - in raw numbers Romney will end up with more votes than Bush in 2004, there will likely end up being no more than a 1% drop in Romney’s vote from 2004 factoring in population growth.

It’s hard to make a case that more than 0.1% or 0.2% of that dtrop would be people that voted for Bush that stayed home because Romney was a RINO or Mormon.

If you leave out Texas (as there’s a native son effect) Romney did just as well in the Bible Belt as Bush in 2004.


10 posted on 11/11/2012 4:09:42 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson