Skip to comments.Meet the Press Panel Blames Romney Loss on Limbaugh and ‘Loons and Wackos’ of Conservative Base
Posted on 11/11/2012 5:33:53 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
And the beat goes on.
That’s odd because I blame the media and the 47%.
Meet the Press???? What is Meet the Press? Don’t watch it, never heard of it. BUT I know who Rush Limbaugh is!!! Go Rush!
Now they have flipped to say Mitt’s ideas were what the nation needs.
Also why do they want the GOP to win?
Our huge 2010 WIN is owed to OUR TEA PARTY.
Romney ran AWAY from OUR TEA PARTY!
Meet the Depressed is as far left as it always has been. And, of course, the rank in file GOP elites like Boehner will come a-whoring along to agree with them.
Did you EVER hear of a mainstream media organ OR the Democrat Party blaming THEIR loss on “left-wing loons”?
Romney...probably a pleasant fellow but not the kind of MAN that I want leading the nation. No fire in the belly.
“Did you EVER hear of a mainstream media organ OR the Democrat Party blaming THEIR loss on left-wing loons?”
No, because they made sure their left wing loon won. :(
Like Rush said the other day...I’m sure all those Dems that say what’s wrong with the Republican Party are really looking out for them.
Now they have flipped to say Mitts ideas were what the nation needs. ..................... Of course, they’re getting ready for 2016, they want him to run again, so he can lose again.
Steve, here's your sign!
Romney would have been much better than the Marxist.
“Romney...probably a pleasant fellow but not the kind of MAN that I want leading the nation. No fire in the belly.”
He had something during the first debate but at Newt must’ve learned, you need more than just one good debate performance.
memo to meet the press historians....(cough cough)
History is clear. When there is huge ideological wedge, Republicans win big. When the divide is fuzzy, Democrats win.
80: Reagan in rout over libeal Carter
84: Reagan in historic landslide over liberal Mondale.
88: We thought Bush 41 was conservative at that time, and he wins in route
92: Bush 41 outted as moderate, and Clinton blurs line, along with perot
94: Most ideolgoical and national mid term ever, GOP in ROUTE.
96: Dole? Puh leeze
00: No clear message, muddled result
02: Democrats out themselves as radicals, GOP picks up seats
04: Kerry Edwards far left weirdos, giving Bush just enough room
06: Moderate GOP down in flames
08: Moderate McCain down in flames
10: like 94, very ideological and results in historic route
12: moderate Mitt down in flames.
History is so so so clear.
hell, even in the screwy year of 98, Jesse Ventura’s third party win in Minnesota was the most conservative campaign in the nation. Now Jesse was too stupid to govern as a conservative, but he did, absolutely, campaign as one. Check the record!!)
Romney would have had a whole lot less votes without the loons and wackos. The ones that voted for Obama wouldn’t have voted for Romney if he ditched us, the loons and wackos. As I see it Romney did keep his distance from the far right.
Most of the press would have voted for Obama no matter what. Maybe Romney could have won if they didn’t pick sides? Maybe the press should show more respect to free speech. They only want their speech recognized.
That’s the problem with our media—they’re all a bunch of flockin’ mini-tyrants.
“Doris Kearns Goodwin”
What does this thieving, plagerizing leftist bytch know about politics.