Skip to comments.Meet the Press Panel Blames Romney Loss on Limbaugh and ‘Loons and Wackos’ of Conservative Base
Posted on 11/11/2012 5:33:53 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
You know they just want whats best for Republicans. How kind and generous of them...not.
It’s easy for the GOP to plan its strategy. Just do the exact opposite of what these idiots say. Steve Schmidt, the genius of 2008?
One word, California.
What is the woman’s name that caused Palin grief? She and Schmidt were backstabbing and I haven’t seen her face around and can’t even remember her name.
If a belief in the true God of the BIBLE and good old fashioned VALUES is enough to make one a loon or wacko then I will ALWAYS support “loons and wackos”!!!
I weep for this nation.
” - - -Steve Schmidt, who managed John McCains 2008 loss, argued that - - - “
Stevie “Lose at any cost” Schmidt is Mr. RINO. Whatever Stevie says we can take as gospel that the opposite is a truer, better course of action for Conservatives.
Freakin left wing whack jobs.
Rush and anyone else had zip to do with Romney’s loss.
Guy is a crap product and that’s why he lost.
The Meet the Pravda panel prefer left-wing loons and wackos. They also prefer the candidate endorsed by the Communist Party USA and Marxist dictators.
Yep. Pete Wilson and the Sperminator were such great moderates. The voters love the GOP moderates so much now. Just ask Gov. Whitman and Sen. Fiorina, and the 2/3 GOP majority in the legislature. Oops.
This is how we know the Libs are worried about out power:
” - - - And they agreed conservatives are the problem.”
The “inconvenient truth” is that Romney IGNORED Conservatives during the Primary, Post-Primary AND the General Campaigns. Well, Romney DID say that during a previous life as Gov. of Mass he was “Seriously Conservative.”
BTW, I had no idea that “Serious” was in such dire straits that it needed to be Conserved! Who knew?
I don't see why they are blaming us. Most of us supported Romney, sometimes reluctantly, but by and large we did since we knew Obama was so much of a worse choice. We voted for the guy. We helped financially. Some of us campaigned for him. How much more can we do? And somehow we're the "problem"? How are you a problem if you end up supporting the party's candidate? Why is that a problem? Would it have been less of a problem for Romney if we didn't? Would that magically have gotten him more votes somehow?
It appears to me that a bigger problem is that the majority of the electorate preferred Obama. They want more free stuff from da gummint. That's a much bigger problem for the country as a whole than conservatives who supported the nominee.
You are 100% correct.
When liberals rate Romney as right wing, words have ceased to mean anything.
He'd have to tack hard a starboard to be a moderate.
Conclusion of the liberal panelists: the Republican Party should adopt the programs and principles of the progressive i.e. socialist Democrat Party. Even though a shift of one and one half million votes or about one percent of the vote would have won it for Romney. What else do you expect socialists to say?
Don’t take the bait. Concentrate on what we need to do.
You are exactly right.