Posted on 11/11/2012 6:27:06 PM PST by wintertime
I don't have an opportunity to listen to talk radio very much and we don't subscribe to cable.
So?....Question:
Do you think Rush, Hannity, and the others in the conservative talk media will cover the blatant voter fraud in the swing states?
Do you think these so-called "conservative" entertainers will bother to mention the more that 100% turn out in dozens of voting districts in the swing states and give it the coverage it deserves?
Do you think they will ignore this issue has they have other important news?
Personally, I would appreciate an update from those who do listen to the talk show media ( radio and TV). Possibly others in my situation would as well.
Waiting for tomorrow ( hopefully they will cover it), Wintertime
1. Fraud occurred.
a.) Traditional Fraud—Dead people voting, Double/triple/etc. Voting,
Fraudulent Voting, etc...This ADDS votes to DEMOCRATS
b.) Voting Machine Fraud—Eliminating Votes From Republicans Through
Programming,( less likely ) Changing Votes Of Republicans Through
Programming (more likely—random # ranging from 5-5000 from each
of the tens of thousands of precincts with computerized ballot
systems)...This SUBTRACTS votes from REPUBLICANS
2. Solution(?)
a.) Millionaire Solution—Donald Trump, Sheldon Adelson, Or the
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeevilllllll Koch Brothers Come Forth
And Offer Ten Million Bucks To Anyone Who Participated In Voter Fraud
To Come Forward And Prove It Took Place. (Immunity, of course)
b.) The Regular Solution—Obtain Several Voting Machines From Various
Polling Places/Warehouses, etc., Procure A Court Order Demanding
Information That Will Establish The Names Of All The Voting Machine
Manufacturers, Their Owners, Relevant Employees, (programmers,
janitors) and Their Affiliation.
On election night I thought the results didn’t make sense.
For a few weeks I observed what was happening and I thought that Romney would win handily. My reasoning:
1. The 2010 elections - shellacking and a change in the US House unlike anything seen in 80 years or 8 decades.
2. Chick-fil-a protests; pathetic counter-protests
3. Prop 8 in California; demographics were young, middle age and old Californians and Catholics/Protestants/Mormons.
4. The Unemployment rate
5. Obamacare
6. Violation of Conscience
7. Violation of Religions freedom
8. Fort Hood
9. Kill List
10. The cut in Military positions about 1 year ago
11. The 90 day pink slips
12. The Black voters in D.C. voting against Gay Marriage
13. The 2 SCOTUS cases on concealed carry (DC and Chicago)
14. DOMA
15. Don’t ask Don’t tell
16. Russia Flexibility
17. Poland
18. Keystone Pipe Line
19. Israel
20. eating “Beans and Franks”
21. “Take a pain-pill”
22. “You didn’t build that”
Maybe I’m too informed and the vast majority is not informed. But what I am always listening for is the older generation speaking about how it’s been in the past. They say that we’ve not had a person like Obama. Ok, he is unprecedented. Well maybe people will see this and change course.
Romney had to fight:
Obama’s campaign
The Media (Pravda)
The Debate Moderator (Big lady Candy)
Harry Reid
I just don’t think the results made sense nonetheless.
To be fair, I will say that when campaigning I understand that for Bush’s re-election you volunteered and they would meet you in a parking lot and hand you a paper copy of Phone numbers and you’d call these people telling them that they should vote - even offer rides. This ORCA project I just don’t get and know why it was used.
Still I think he should have won and these results don’t make sense to me.
Romney and conservatives have to fight:
Public Schools
We’ve seen the Youtube videos where teachers deride conservative students; which is easily seen similarly in old Soviet Union movies with conservative and the religious students being harassed and, arguably, brainwashed.
“But there are good teachers in public schools”
This line of thinking is believing lies - it’s the system that is so bad; sadly.
The public library will throw you in jail if you steal one of their books but we can’t get our Voting system in order?
Look at the data results of Clinical Trials, Sports Stats and/or Peer Reviewed papers - those are real numbers. Look at Election results numbers and sometimes you may not even see the number of REGISTERED Voters! What?
Joke. For Sure. Not only, may, there be a Gorilla in the Room but an Elephant as well in tandem.
Well those are my thoughts, hopefully they offer something and make at least a little sense. I tend to not hang out on Forums.
Thanks for listening.
I heard Cunninghams’ comments, I think on Hannity’s show, late afternoon Tuesday. That’s what shocked me about Ohio late in the evening. Something ain’t right....not right at all.
I heard Cunninghams’ comments, I think on Hannity’s show, late afternoon Tuesday. That’s what shocked me about Ohio late in the evening. Something ain’t right....not right at all.
Which show? Cunninghams or Roots? Thanks.
Rush is still waiting for his ... “I sense a wave of something, I don’t know what it is, a tsunami of conservatism to clear the decks of Obama and his cronies from the American political scene. This election is about 2010!” ... prognostication to come to pass. Rush was as wrong as anybody but i suspect he knew the jig was up late in the week before the election when he couldn’t explain why the polls were tightening. I like Rush but when he misses the mark he’ll never acknowledge it. Bringing up voter fraud would mean having to explain how he was so wrong.
He is a good businessman, but he does’t not get “paid’ - he owns his show in effect, with all kinds of distribution and profit sharing agreements by way of Clear Channel and Premiere Radio. He is also immune to ratings for the most part, as they go up and down, but his show’s revenues and his advertisers results are consistently doing great.
Beyond that, he’s got more money now than he’ll ever be able to spend, thus, he is not particularly concerned with ratings and not at all with pay. He will follow his instincts. That’s always been his busienss model. The key is for Allen West or Mark Levin or something to make his instincts start to think this thing was fraud on a massive scale.
...uh....except that he’s admitted just that often this past week.....and admitted some other things that don’t make sense.
Ok. Thx for the update. Hadnt heard much the past week except the last 90 mins of some of the shows.
That’s not to say he’s bought into the fraud thing yet though. A lot has devleoped on that over the weekend, so I’ll be listening Monday to see. He did do major mea culpa on the polls and on the American people, his understanding of them, however.
So? Do you think Rush will dance around this topic in a vague way, or do you think he will start quoting the hard numbers of the more than 100% turnouts?
Thx
I hope he starts in on those 100 per cent plus districts and precincts. My hunch is that Levin might be the key to convincing him. Or the Allen West issue. I don’t think he’ll dance around it, he’ll either believe it’s a significant issue, meaning potentially millions of votes, or he won’t believe it. He won’t believe it yet cover it up anyway.
Fox news? No.
Maybe Rush was right on the polls. Last I hear polls don’t factor in fraud.
Rush, Hannity and the rest are entertainers. Mark Levin is more than an entertainer.
The squeaking wheel gets the oil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.