Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petraeus told within last six weeks of probe that found affair
fox news ^ | 11/11/2012 | By Catherine Herridge

Posted on 11/11/2012 8:21:26 PM PST by tobyhill

FBI investigators confronted then CIA Director David Petraeus within the last six weeks about his relationship with biographer Paula Broadwell, Fox News has learned -- a detail that comes as lawmakers complain they did not know about the issue until Petraeus resigned Friday.

A source, who is not authorized to speak on the record about the FBI investigation due to its sensitive nature, characterized the meeting between Petraeus and Bureau agents as “recent, and within the last six weeks.”

Asked when Broadwell was confronted, Fox News was told “a little before that.”

Asked why the FBI did not brief Congress immediately when Petraeus’ name surfaced within the scope of the investigation, the source said decisions on notification “should all play out next week” -- a reference to a half dozen Capitol Hill hearings and briefings on the Benghazi consulate attack.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; petraeus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2012 8:21:35 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Is it possible not even Holder knew of the investigation, because he and Obama were targets?


2 posted on 11/11/2012 8:23:32 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Screw the lawmakers, the voters didn't know about it.
3 posted on 11/11/2012 8:23:45 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Obama knew. Long before election night.

Absolutely.


4 posted on 11/11/2012 8:31:33 PM PST by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

POTUS would have been told the moment the investigation started unless the FBI is purposely keeping him in the dark about potential security threats at the highest levels.


5 posted on 11/11/2012 8:34:09 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

But the FBI guy who called Cantor is said to be a “whistleblower”. How do we know the whole investigation wasn’t a rogue whistleblowing effort without official FBI sanction?


6 posted on 11/11/2012 8:36:36 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If this plays out the way it looks that it might it could very well come to impeachment.Of course there’s not a prayer that he’ll be *removed* but it would still be big.I can’t wait to hear “but it’s only about a dead Ambassador”.


7 posted on 11/11/2012 8:36:57 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I wonder what kind of security issues the FBI found on Zer0? Them may have been riding on that information until after the election. They may have been counting on Zer0 not being reelected to push the matter even further. Now that Zer0 has been reelected, there is one hot potato to deal with and Congress had better get clicking.


8 posted on 11/11/2012 8:39:51 PM PST by jonrick46 (The opium of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
WE DON'T!...

But what we DO know is more important at this point,,,,Let it drip for 4 more yrs....

9 posted on 11/11/2012 8:41:25 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

?? you really think so ?? I think that obama has covered all his bases with such perfect crooks that no pry bar will be big or strong enough to remove him.


10 posted on 11/11/2012 8:42:27 PM PST by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

According to a source with direct knowledge of the situation, Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Wash., was told in October by a friend that a whistle-blower had information that implicated Petraeus, the retired four-star general and top CIA official, in an extramarital affair that may also have involved a national security breach.


11 posted on 11/11/2012 8:43:04 PM PST by jonrick46 (The opium of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

from WSJ piece today...

By late summer, after the monitoring of Ms. Broadwell’s emails uncovered the link to Mr. Petraeus, prosecutors and agents alerted senior officials at FBI and the Justice Department, including Mr. Holder, U.S. officials say.

-excerpt-

Top officials signed off on the interviews, which occurred in late September and October, just before the U.S. presidential election. During Ms. Broadwell’s first interview in September, she admitted to the affair and turned over her computer, the officials said.

On her computer, investigators found classified documents, the U.S. officials said, a discovery that raised new concerns.

At Mr. Petraeus’s interview in the week before the election, he also admitted the affair and said he hadn’t provided the classified documents to Ms. Broadwell. Agents conducted a second interview with Ms. Broadwell on Nov. 2. She also said Mr. Petraeus wasn’t the source of the documents.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324073504578113460852395852.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet


12 posted on 11/11/2012 8:43:23 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
CUT THROUGH THE CRAP


13 posted on 11/11/2012 8:44:11 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

I reckon we don’t know. FWIW I heard that the WB went to some Rep. or Sen. named Reichart (sp?) and Reichart went to Cantor.


14 posted on 11/11/2012 8:45:44 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
My opinion

White House knew about the affair before Petraeus was chosen for director and would NOT have chosen him for director had they not had something on him.

15 posted on 11/11/2012 8:48:34 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I think Obama is going to resign. Oh my God. Can Hillary be Vice President? If she was and Biden resigned, could she serve out this term and then be elected two more terms? I’m going to bed.


16 posted on 11/11/2012 8:48:41 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
By late summer, after the monitoring of Ms. Broadwell’s emails uncovered the link to Mr. Petraeus, prosecutors and agents alerted senior officials at FBI and the Justice Department, including Mr. Holder, U.S. officials say.

I thought it was a six months plus investigation!?! It too the FBI that long to find a link between Broadwell's e-mails and Petraeus?

17 posted on 11/11/2012 8:49:57 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

read this...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324073504578113460852395852.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet


18 posted on 11/11/2012 8:50:21 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
From the article:

What is publicly known about the timeline suggests Broadwell learned she was the subject of an FBI investigation as early as September and Petraeus shortly thereafter."""...

Broadwell learned in Sept., Like before 9/11 or after, I wonder.

Petraeus..shortly thereafter......like before 9/11 or after.

If she learned before, I would assume she would have told him in some PILLOW TALK setting, before he was called out by others. Wouldn't ya think, being the sweet little lady she is and so loving her man Petraeus/s.

Or did she continue to pay him "visits" and say nothing? (Like my bestess boyfriend is being investigated by the FBI, but I won't tell him??)

She was deposited there to set him up, not hard to resist. Wonder how much money she and hubby will make off with.

Yes, honey, for a couple MILLION Dollars you can be the slut.

19 posted on 11/11/2012 8:50:28 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

I share your opinion and if Petraeus has an ounce of honor and loyalty to this country he will march his butt up to Capitol Hill immediately and spill his guts on everything.


20 posted on 11/11/2012 8:52:24 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

He was using a pseudonym and they weren’t really that interested in the sex emails, because they were trying to investigate the harrassing emails sent to Kelley.


21 posted on 11/11/2012 8:53:14 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Impeached, but not removed. Same as Slick, and a leftist idiot to this day will deny that Slick was impeached. lol


22 posted on 11/11/2012 8:53:37 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So what we’re finding out here is that within days of the 09/11/12 fiasco, the FBI was telling Petraeus they had some dirt on him...

So glad to know the timing indicates that this couldn’t have been Benghazi timing related...

Oh wait!

We’re seeing some high stakes poker here IMO. Makes me wonder what else the White House has on the general. They just showed they’re willing to dump info, so he’s on record now.

Keeping Hillary close may have been a great idea. She’s tops when it comes to covering criminal behavior.


23 posted on 11/11/2012 8:58:36 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
From your link...

"On her computer, investigators found classified documents, the U.S. officials said, a discovery that raised new concerns."

Well well well

24 posted on 11/11/2012 8:58:40 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; All

quote:
Jennifer Griffin
@JenGriffinFNC

Holly Petraeus may have known about affair all along - family friends tell Fox. Why reveal it now...just days before Petraeus to testify?


25 posted on 11/11/2012 9:01:34 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Petraeus was pressured into making the statement three days after Benghazi that it was related to the video. More than likely, he was offered a deal to keep things quiet and keep his job. Ultimately, duty, honor, and country won out and he resigned. Of course. Clapper helped move things along once he found out.


26 posted on 11/11/2012 9:03:12 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

I agree!


27 posted on 11/11/2012 9:03:17 PM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

Never know when the Chicago Thugs might need a little help creating
a lie about a video causing Benghizi. Ironic that Betrayus and the CIA
Just happened to clone to the same conclusion early on.


28 posted on 11/11/2012 9:03:27 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

We don’t know how classified, or where she told them that she got them from, but apparently her answer satisfied them.


29 posted on 11/11/2012 9:03:35 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Sounds plausible but thin.


30 posted on 11/11/2012 9:04:44 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“Why reveal it now...just days before Petraeus to testify?”

Because it was all unravelling and getting ready to come out. He can testify at a later date.


31 posted on 11/11/2012 9:06:17 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

That sounds plausible too but even thinner.


32 posted on 11/11/2012 9:12:16 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

From WSJ article

“She also said Mr. Petraeus wasn’t the source of the documents.”

If not her, then who?


33 posted on 11/11/2012 9:16:38 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
He can testify at a later date.

Sure, why not? It's not like the country is waiting to find out why he lied about the hoax 'video' or whether or not the CiC is a total craven coward who turned his back on 41 State and CIA employees and left them to sink or swim with al Qaeda. Maybe a few months in the Caribbean with his wife will patch his marriage up so well no one will care about those silly embassies and consulates.

34 posted on 11/11/2012 9:17:26 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I read it!....and to quote

The disclosure policy was reinforced in a 2007 memorandum by Michael Mukasey, who was then attorney general under President George W. Bush<<<

BUSH'S FAULT!...Got it???...end of story!

35 posted on 11/11/2012 9:24:11 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I share your opinion and if Petraeus has an ounce of honor and loyalty to this country <<

an ounce!!....Ive seen pounds given from enlisted men...(check the wall)....What can a General give his country when it counts?..... IMHO...His only "personnel" salvation is to tell the truth...Lets see what hes made of?

36 posted on 11/11/2012 9:40:00 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I work long hours and have no access to TV. That said, I need an update on the latest with the FBI and petraeus scandal. What exactly is the latest findings and logical train of thought. Reading the posts responses I’m not too clear as to what has happened/or going to happen. Thanks in advance.


37 posted on 11/11/2012 9:46:36 PM PST by Conservative4Ever (I'm going Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

I’m afraid it does come down to this. He may have given forty great years of service to his country in uniform but is any of it worth a dime if he walks out on his oath now?


38 posted on 11/11/2012 9:47:06 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

NO. They both knew.


39 posted on 11/11/2012 9:54:11 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Ever

The latest is that this affair is a diversion from a dead ambassador, a state department employee, and two CIA contractors. And that the CinC refused to authorize military assistance to these people. General Petraeus wants some time to get his life in order because his $iitbucket is full. And Hillary does not have time to answer questions from the Legislature.


40 posted on 11/11/2012 9:55:17 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Read the Constitution! Third in line would be the Speaker off the House. You need to go to Hillsdale.com and do the on line Constitution Course.


41 posted on 11/11/2012 10:32:30 PM PST by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
I think Obama is going to resign.

lol....no he's not. With Boehner in charge, he'll never be impeached, either.
42 posted on 11/11/2012 10:39:43 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Thank you for the recap. Is the administration afraid petraeus will testify and tell all about Libya?


43 posted on 11/11/2012 10:53:43 PM PST by Conservative4Ever (I'm going Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kabar

How is this considered duty, honor, and country if he won’t testify to what occurred with Benghazi? I call that cowardice.

He may have been encouraged to go with the video route, but with his attitude about never blaming the islamo crazies for their own crazy behavior, I can see him believing that scenario.

No, he is a coward to say he needs to worry about his personal life now vs. testifying. That is such a pathetic excuse for a “warrior”.


44 posted on 11/11/2012 11:01:39 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
if Petraeus has an ounce of honor

The West Point Cadet Code of Honor: "A Cadet will NOT LIE, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate anyone who does." Inasmuch as Petraeus has lied at least twice (blaming that obscure video for what occurred in Benghazi, and breaking his marriage vows), I fear you have your answer as to his 'honor' (or lack thereof)...

the infowarrior

45 posted on 11/11/2012 11:02:32 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Ever

I can’t tell one way or the other.


46 posted on 11/11/2012 11:04:28 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

The video of Paula Broadwell at the University of Denver has her talking about duty, honor, country. It’s interesting.


47 posted on 11/11/2012 11:06:55 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

He has demonstrated that potential. I hope his conscience is sufficiently pricked to lead him back to his oaths and his love of country.


48 posted on 11/11/2012 11:08:56 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
He has demonstrated that potential.

He has, I believe, done much more than that. He has sacrificed the enduring (his integrity and honor) on the altar of the immediate. Since he has, by his own volition, sacrificed his integrity, I can no longer trust whatever testimony he would give in regards to Benghazi.

He may, in time give his testimony in regards to that incident, but even if his testimony were true, logical in my eyes, and in accord with what *I* personally believe to be the truth regarding the death of Ambassador Stevens, and the others, I would still be hesitant to accept it at face value.

Integrity, honor, once lost, is nearly impossible to regain...

the infowarrior

49 posted on 11/11/2012 11:55:35 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

Mmm. True. Very true.


50 posted on 11/11/2012 11:57:42 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson