Posted on 11/12/2012 1:51:04 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Edited on 11/12/2012 1:56:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
It is clear that Obama hates the U.S. Constitution. Has himself stated that it's a flawed document and it and the courts do not go far enough in saying what the government must do for you on your behalf in regards to social and economic justice and the redistribution wealth. He says the courts have failed to remove the constraints on government from doling out social and economic justice, so it must be done legislatively.
In a 2001 interview, Obama says:
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK.
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that."
And more recently, President Obama threatens that if he cannot get the congress to move, he will find ways to go around it. He will rule by executive order and do whatever it takes to get around the congress that stands in his way of correcting the wrongs in the constitution.
And during the campaign, President Obama instructs his followers that if they bring a knife, you bring a gun. And in the very last days when he thought he was losing the election, "President" Obama reaches out to "his" community with the call to "Vote for revenge!"
It's clear that not only does Obama hate the constitution, he hates the rule of law, hates liberty, agrees with Rev Wright his mentor that America should be damned by God and calls for violence and revenge from the bully pulpit!
The admitted Marxist Obama swore an oath to defend the constitution but is now aiming to destroy it by his own hand, and to destroy American liberty, all in the name of economic and social justice, redistributionism and REVENGE!
A true leftist revolutionary wannabe dictator now sits on his throne, scheming to mete out his brand of justice and revenge, unencumbered by the "flawed constitution," the courts, the threat of removal by election or, with traitor Reid in charge, removal from office by impeachment.
Will Obama become America's Cesar, er, Hugo Chavez? The socialist democrat Dream Act is the vehicle to get it done.
NOT ON MY WATCH!!
This is treason!!
And the wimps in the GOP are too afraid to take this obvious leftist treason head-on. Worse, they're urging that the Republican party must move left!
We must RESIST such tyranny to the hilt!!
If not us, who?
If not now, when?
I’m thinkin we can do a little revolting of our own.
Hugo Chavez. Not Cesar.
HOORAY JimRob! TREASON on many levels...in real-time, continuous, ongoing.
Oops.
Leftist revolution = target rich environment.
Let's do it.
We finish it.
I think this qualifies for a Civil War II ping!
If the shootin’ starts, then I will feel pretty good about the chances of the those of us on the right. I do NOT want to see violence or bloodshed, particularly in my own circle of family and friends, but I will do what I have to do to defend my nation.
Sedition, treason, the penalty is the same.
The party that controls the House of Representatives controls the power of impeachment. Even if a president is never removed from office by the Senate, an impeachment hobbles the activities of a president.
Resist We Much!!!!!!
I have posted on a couple of threads that if the right played by the same rules as the left, the national mall would be jam packed with conservatives, and Sarah Palin would be up there with a bullhorn in the biting cold demanding a recount in light of allegations of massive voter fraud. But so far it’s gone over like a lead balloon. So good luck with that “resistance” thing.
I thought he meant “Salad”
I was just thinking about that this afternoon. But we’ll need to get rid of Boehner first.
Yep, we have to revolt in various ways. I am minimizing purchases -- only absolute necessities.
As reported on Rush and elesewhere today, Obama got a higher vote percentage in some Ohio and Philly precincts (99 to 100%) that Hugo gets in Venezuela.
This is approaching Sadam’s Iraq with out all the quasi-military uniforms. (Maybe that will be Moochelle’s job?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.