Skip to comments.
Bush & Rumsfeld would be blamed if their CIA director had done this
November 13, 2012
Posted on 11/13/2012 5:24:38 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
You know damn well Bush would be taking media heat, joined with the 'rats in DC.
TODAY, the socialist clown and his lisping SecDef are getting a free pass.
This is all a diversion to keep people from learning how the administration basically gave a thumbs up to the murder of our Libyan ambassador.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bias; cia; media; vanity
As I see it.
The Director of Central Intelligence is in no way under the Secretary of Defense. He reports directly to the president. Just sayin’.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:26:49 AM PST
(You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
It’s gone way beyond just Libya now.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:33:28 AM PST
Your exactly right. But then again, this affirmative action presidency has gotten a pass on everything from even before they were in office.
Per Obama: If it happened on your watch it is your reponsibility.
Discipline is breaking down in federal government agencies. Start dismantling the feds and return responsibility to the states.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:40:02 AM PST
(Welcome to U.S.Zimbabwe)
What makes you think that Bush won’t be blamed for this? The media is all over the shirtless FBI agent, and the ensuing chick fight, and yet no one seems to care who knew and when did they know it. Meanwhile back at the Benghazi ranch....
posted on 11/13/2012 5:43:51 AM PST
(I'm looking into an exploratory committee for this)
Not to mention the daily bashing for the continued poor response to hurricane Sandy.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:45:32 AM PST
by Brooklyn Attitude
(Its finally happened. The parasites can out vote the productive. Welcome to bankruptcy.)
I suspect that some of these warriors moved up the chain precisely because their chinked armor was considered useful, should it ever become necessary to clean house.
The Benghazi debacle then necessitated the brooms and mops.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:45:56 AM PST
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
Oh, I am sure that Bush might be blamed! I mean, there is a guy IN JAIL right now in order to throw people off of the Benghazi bungle....
And the sky is blue. What’s your point?
How sure are you that they won't somehow be blamed anyway? Bush nominated him to Central Command. It would surprise me in the least if the left tried to portray Petraeus as a ‘Bush guy’ that Obama promoted out of respect for the previous administration's efforts.
Petreus showed his mental weakness by engaging in this affair. It is a sign of mental weakness and moral weakness to do what he did.
posted on 11/13/2012 5:57:44 AM PST
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson