Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting Machines [Video]
The Right Planet ^ | 11-08-12 | Sard

Posted on 11/13/2012 8:31:04 PM PST by Kevin in California

Clinton Eugene Curtis testified under oath, before the Ohio State legislature, that he wrote a program to rig elections. This program would flip the total vote from the real winner to the candidate who had been pre-selected to win by the electronic vote counting machines….


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; votefraud; voterfraud; voterigging; votingmachines
Too little, too late!
1 posted on 11/13/2012 8:31:09 PM PST by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Definitely not “too late,” because I think I saw this video back in 2006(?).


2 posted on 11/13/2012 8:36:31 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot8; RedMDer; smoothsailing; Kevin in California

PING


3 posted on 11/13/2012 8:37:16 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Anything is possible... loose lips sink ships?

Guaranteed that someone is laughing and boasting over a drink. All that has to happen is have the wrong ears present.... or the right woman!

Evidence is evidence.


4 posted on 11/13/2012 8:40:36 PM PST by himno hero (hadnuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
Too late suckers :

Ohio food stamps for low income families will be reduced in January 2013 (only told after the election)(examiner, November 12, 2012)

5 posted on 11/13/2012 8:42:16 PM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Bohner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Freepers.....This is a video well worth the time to watch!
6 posted on 11/13/2012 9:04:54 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

This is what I have been hoping for. For the recent election. James O’Keefe as a computer programmer telling us someone wanted to hire him to use such a program.

Let it come to light, if it has happened, Lord!


7 posted on 11/13/2012 9:08:16 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

So He says he did this for a Republican?


8 posted on 11/13/2012 9:11:41 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

I think there was fraud. But I also think Dems used some sort of data mining to pick up new young voters to replace the ones they lost from ‘08. I saw young voters at my polling place, some were in the wrong place so I’m guessing its the first time they voted. It looked like there was little old time electioneering going on. Often the local politicians stand outside the polling place and greet you. Goes back to the Chicago Dem days, they wanted to make sure you were showing up. You had to if you wanted your garbage picked up and snow removed. No one outside the polling place this time. Dems must be loving these new young low information voters. They don’t appear to expect anything in return for their vote. They are more interested in keeping their abortion or sticking it to the evil white rich guys.


9 posted on 11/13/2012 9:13:08 PM PST by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

That vid was posted back on July 6th.

Just a few days before the election.


10 posted on 11/13/2012 9:15:05 PM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Bohner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

The one place/point for getting a review could/would be the December day when then the electoral votes certified. A little fortitude by a few congresspersons might jam up certification for an unprecedented review.


11 posted on 11/13/2012 9:17:07 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2

Unfortunately, this programmer told everybody how to do it. The only ways to prove the hacking are (1) paper trail and (2) design the source code so it eats itself. We’re going to need human testimony.


12 posted on 11/13/2012 9:21:08 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

I stated that wrong. Paper trail could disprove the computer results. If the source code is designed to eat itself, there’s no way to check the computer results that way.


13 posted on 11/13/2012 9:23:41 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
  Paper trail could disprove the computer results.

  The current system seems to be created for fraud. It just seems ridiculous to use a computer to record a vote in the 1st place when all it takes is a card with names on it and places to mark the choice in pencil. The original cards would be kept and each card should run through 2 tabulating machines made by different manufacturers. Photo id should always be required and voting should only take place on election day. I don't know what to do about absentee voting. There should be some way to do it without lending itself to fraud.
14 posted on 11/13/2012 9:50:16 PM PST by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Kevin in California
That vid was posted back on July 6th.

It's not a new video though. It's from 2004. Please see my comment #51 here. The questioners are all Democrats. So is the programmer, who had aspirations to unseat the Republican he accuses in his testimony.

15 posted on 11/13/2012 10:19:07 PM PST by PeevedPatriot ("A wise man's heart inclines him toward the right, but a fool's heart toward the left."--Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
This is such a simple thing to fix.
All you have to do is:
- Write the software and compile is as a single executable
and
- equip the voting machine with a permanent ROM (not writable) that does an MD5 hash check on the software that boots... no match? = no boot.

This would prevent any tampering of the software after it has been hash checked at the time of manufacture.

THEN, you would need to standardize all machines across the board, mandate every state use the same one. Once the baseline is secured, established and verified, there can be no tampering of code.

The real problem is, the voters are the only ones who want it fixed and fair... so efforts to secure the systems will never be of interest to those who can actually make it happen.

16 posted on 11/13/2012 11:00:28 PM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FunkyZero
- Write the software and compile is as a single executable and - equip the voting machine with a permanent ROM (not writable) that does an MD5 hash check on the software that boots... no match? = no boot.

It is so simple a Caveman could do it, if the Marxists were not in control.

People seem to have an abnormal amount of trust in shiny machines that they can touch and see results. Of course the real fraud is easiest with the scanners that read and record results from paper ballots.

We will have to give up the secret ballot, by using a thumb print or even DNA so you can check to see if your vote was tabulated they way you cast it. The chance any of that will happen, near absolute zero.

17 posted on 11/14/2012 1:20:46 AM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

There needs to be a complete reworking of the voting system in America. I live in a sparsely populated area in Tennessee. We moved to this county in May and registered to vote in June. We also kept our house in a neighboring county where we retained city property voting rights. We registered for our city voting rights in September. So we voted in our local precinct in our county, then went and voted our city property rights vote where our rent house is. At our local precinct, I was on the books, but my husband wasn’t, even though they had sent him a voting card. He had to cast a provisional ballet. First ever in our county, they said. Anyway, we went on to town to vote our property rights and neither one of us was on the books. I guess I should make it clear that we voted the city election only where we have our rent house. But anyway, the counting card for one of the small towns in our county didn’t work so our vote totals didn’t get turned in till sometime Wednesday. What a mess!


18 posted on 11/14/2012 4:15:02 AM PST by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

bttt


19 posted on 11/14/2012 1:10:22 PM PST by txhurl (Once you go Asian, you never miss an equation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson