Oh, sure, we have a leaker to embarrass this nobody but crickets on what the hell happened in Libya.
How strange it is that to read the other side now, this agent does not sound like who was first portrayed in the beginning. But the first stories always seem to be the ones people remember.
So...more anti-muslim terrorist officials are being purged. All these dots will connect to obama.
What if Ms. Kelly was some kind of agent? Or manipulated by one?
She could draw senior military to her home, then; say massacre or poison them? How could our highest levels expose themselves to such a risk?
Paula B may have done us a favor.
Are we not entertained?
"I think there's a leaker in the bureau," Berger told the Tampa Bay Times. "Somebody has it in for my guy."
Who would/could leak to the WSJ? Natalie & Jill Kelleydashian wouldn't know the WSJ from a work shovel. If they went to anyone it would be local, at best (witness Jill's sadly hilarious 911 call). Their minds don't work outside that sphere.
Occam says Broadwell's husband.
What happened to the story that she was the one who felt threatened???
This is bs. The emails she got hit too close to home and that is what bothered her. She was worried that someone was on to her inappropriate relationships with the brass.
And she played Agent Shirtless for a fool.
Why is it assumed that Broadwell is a
“bad guy”? She has documents?
Do those documents incriminate anyone? if so, who?
Was she working against the twin sisters? or with them?
I see a lot of fingers pointing to Broadwell, but not sure who determined that she was working for the administration—or not.
(sorry, I don’t read a lot of political thriller novels)!!