Posted on 11/15/2012 8:13:16 AM PST by SE Mom
Ping for hearings- the open ones.
oh...I thought this wasn’t public. Can someone post any interesting snippets for those of us office bound?
thanks!
junkie
Thanks for the link. Who is this guy?
This is the open one- there are all kinds of hearings going on up there.
At the moment the discussion is about who is in charge of security- who pays for it- blah..blah...
I THINK he’s a GAO guy...but not sure.
I tried to find this on CSPAN...but apparently it’s not there so I can’t tell who this is..
This guy is just going to defer to others all day.
They have GAO testimony? Sheesh. Where is the CIA, where are the Navy Seals?
Nothing to see here, folks, it’s all about sex, move along...
Yeah...in fact this thread might be a waste of time- I originally thought it might be worthwhile.
Maybe not.
Burton is doing a good job
Thanks! for ping. I looked last night for the open hearing.
Is C-Span not covering this? I tried to find TV schedule last night. Info on time/date was impossible to find.
That FOX was carrying this hearing wasn’t even publicized by FOX on Brett, Hannity, or Greta??? How odd. What Gives?
How did you find it, Mom?
incompetence or all part of the plan.
If all the progressives, socialists, communists, Marxists and Fascists in our government have security clearances, I suppose WE can watch.
Who is covering the hearing?
TIA
Now we have this Ackerman bastard using the hyperbole 'let's just hang the guilty parties'. well yes, you sonofabitching democrat scum, let's just do that, starting with YOU!
Mr. F is even better
I’ll buy the rope Mr. F
Felatiomavega is speaking now, blaming the lack of security on budget cuts.
You know what? Obama is the one who waged war in Libya without the consent of Congress. And then Obama left his own men hanging out to die?
What a laugh.
they all have to be paid equally... obama signed the bill...remember
All together now “the president is innocent.”
I just went over to the FOX website and saw the banner for live hearing...
No idea why Cspan isn’t on this- maybe it’s not a big deal??
WOW. There’s actually a MAN there.. Dale Rohrbacher!
He doesn’t know if it was a hit... please
Don’t expect much other than the company line.They now have their lie like they want it and that is the way it will be from this point on.
he’s right it wasn’t a budget issue.
I’ll still buy the rope Mr. F
Is that Art Carney (AKA Ed Norton) next to Mr F?
"No idea why C-span isnt on this- maybe its not a big deal??"
I would assume it will be carried by C-Span later tonight.
Nothing going on here, comrade folks; just provable treason of the highest order.
The anger from Ackermanasshat is indicative that someone is getting too close to exposing the fecklessness of the pResident and the entire enemycratic party.
Thank You.
Dems keep trying to deflect blame onto Republicans for ‘lack of funding’. Then, why was Stevens’ posted there if no money for his security? That’s MY question.
yawn. will mean nothing. wake me up with it’s running live on the big three network and dominating the nightly news.
“blaming the lack of security on budget cuts.”
Even Charlotte Lamb testified that $ was not the issue.
True... I meant the gao guy wouldn’t admit to it being a hit
burton knows
Real investigation or another pony show. We’ll see.
Previous testimony (by Lamb I believe) indicated that budgeting was not an issue on the lack of security.
The Democrat’s answer to every problem is “More Taxes!”
It’s not more complicated than that.
If any of you are sitting behind a house member of this charade are reading this, kick your boss in the azz and ask him to ask the gao guy if this incident rises to the level of impeachment of obama.
This hearing is a waste of time. It is more like a talking point hearing.
Mr. Connolly, now there is a name. Mr. Connolly bares teeth.
Wow, this current pig is really squealing, trying to divert the focus! That pig will need a very stron rope to handle him if we tale Ackerman’s suggestion!
This is true.. She said so under oath.. Just pointing out the Dems are pulling their defensive crap.
I’ve read that the acting CIA Director will testify that the CIA on the ground never asked for military support.
In the first hearing, most of the Dems walked out. Guess they decided to stay and defend Obama this time.
I’m gonna bailout now.. it’s a sleeper. thanks again for the link though.
Benghazi and Beyond: What Went Wrong on September 11, 2012 and How to Prevent it from Happening at other Frontline Posts
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/hearings/view/?1478
Witnesses
Mr. Michael Courts
Acting Director
International Affairs and Trade
Government Accountability Office Download Prepared Statement
Mr. William Young
Senior Policy Analyst
RAND Corporation Download Prepared Statement | Download Truth-in-Testimony Disclosure
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
Director
Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies
The Heritage Foundation Download Prepared Statement | Download Truth-in-Testimony Disclosure
The Honorable Ronald E. Neumann
President
American Academy of Diplomacy Download Prepared Statement | Download Truth-in-Testimony Disclosure
About the Committee (26 Repubs and 18 Dems)
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/about/
The House Committee on Foreign Affairs, chaired by Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, considers legislation that impacts the diplomatic community, which includes the Department of State, the Agency for International Development (USAID), the Peace Corps, the United Nations, and the enforcement of the Arms Export Control Act.
As typical at these type of hearings, the Dems are more interested in protecting the administration than they are at getting to the truth. If we had an honest media this would never be allowed to happen.
Have an observation. Will tell what that observation is if it happens again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.