Skip to comments.Al Qaeda is winning. Someone ran an operation to take out Patreaus, Allen, Et. Al.
Posted on 11/15/2012 5:57:06 PM PST by CriticalThinking
As part of its long term plan for a regional theocracy (Caliphate), it seems reasonable for Al Qaeda and its supporters to further weaken US military leadership. Its perfectly reasonable to think Al Qaeda and other nation states are running intelligence operations against US officials. Any intelligence officer knows that somewhere between 30%-60% of people cheat on their spouse. They also know everyone uses Gmail, and US officials using Gmail have been hacked. American media loves a scandal, so its easy to take out someone in leadership with a story about sex. So, if a foreign intelligence officer monitored the habits of 3 key officials, statistics says 1 or 2 of those officials will be cheating on their spouse. If you monitor enough officials email and activities, you will find a suitable patsy somewhere along the way. In this case it happens to be General Allen and Petraeus. It could have just as easily been the Joint Chiefs or Panetta. China, Israel, India and perhaps Russia have the skills required to hack Gmail and track government officials on a large scale. China and India need a lot of oil to keep growing. China would be more than happy to use oil from a new Middle East theocracy. Al Qaeda, through friends, can get to our Gmail.
(Excerpt) Read more at 4yourcountry.org ...
I have my tin foil on, too.
Acquaint yourself with Occams Razor. Powerful men (and even not-so-powerful ones) have let the little head do the thinking for the big head since time immemorial. The simplest explanation is usually the best.
A) The folks that brought us Zero have Eric Holder at the Justice Department, taking care of the internal investigative end of political enemies and other projects. They have quite a bit of lattitude in what they can find out.
B) The military leadership, of course, would be brought under much better control, first off, by smart selection of top generals.
For starters, this would mean 1) those already willing (many are political by nature) or 2) those who have something that can be held over them.
A + B(1,2) = what we see going on.
Simple math, IMHO.
But we have not seen the results from tomorrow’s testimony yet. Sometimes people get a case of the morals and can backfire. I’m skeptical, but I have a great deal of hope.
Really? You think Broadwell is a Russian spy and not a social-climbing bimbo? That violates Occam’s Razor.
I used Occam’s Razor as well, but I didn’t see you reference first.
I believe that Abd-barack, not Al-barak.
Sorry, I must’ve confused your thread with some other thread about Petraeus, emails and Broadwell. You seem to have your own thing going. Ignore me.
Start with Lebanon.
No. Someone is collecting data on anyone who can be either friend or foe of O’s agenda. Could be Holder’s people, could be Soros’ people, doesn’t matter. When the time comes to take someone down, if one thing won’t do something else will have to do. Maybe he made a racist comment back in high school. Maybe he charged a meal at Hooters. Maybe he slept with someone or maybe he forgot to mention something on his income tax. Whatever it is, its in the file for when its needed.
If you are on the right side of things, you are teflon. Think of O’s own personal history that most of us have figured out but the press won’t touch. If you are expendable and in the way, anything is enough to take you down. With enough manufactured hysteria from the DNC press, no one will question it. Certainly not the spineless amoebas over at the RNC.
Still looking for a Salahi connection ~
The twins created links with the top officers at Cencom that was ripe for Russian or Cuban intelligence interest.
Add to that our boy Axelrod's willingness to burn up long time Cuban intelligence assets inside the USA to take out Republican candidates.
There's some serious stuff going on ~ and won't be long before some of the peripheral characters like Obama, Biden, their wives, and maybe even Nancy Pelosi will find themselves quite uncomfortably linked to spies, and maybe even saboteurs.
Now, back to LATIN GRAMMYS
Jill Kelly’s role in this incident and her past history makes you wonder is she’s just being used as an actor as a part of a cover story concocted to destroy Petraeus’ credibility if he’s called to testify in Congressional hearings on BenghaziGate.
Minor correction to the title, it should say:
Al Qaeda is winning. Someone in the White House ran an operation to take out Patreaus, Allen, Et. Al.
That is really an incredibly revealing and artistic photo.
The face is the index of the mind; the eyes are windows into the soul.
Patreaus is the only one who looks human inside. He looks as though he’s thinking deeply about the matter.
Petraeus, Allen et al. have not done a particularly impressive job in Afghanistan. The Taliban have not gained much of a victory here - too many conservatives view these guys the same way Broadwell did. Afghanistan is not Iraq.
Haha. You’ve never read of the seven degrees of separation (of Kevin Bacon)? Maybe you’re on LinkedIn and your 100 buddies give you 1000000 in your network?
I agree with your view.
In addition, I am wondering if they are overrated as leaders, period. Petraeus did agree to serve at the CIA under Obama, so effectively despite his apparent competence he is a cog in Obama’s machine.
As far as Afghanistan is concerned, I am finally coming around to the view that perhaps little can be done to salvage the situation there and to conserve our soldiers’ well-being we should pull them out. In the event Al-Qaeda restarts serious operations there I suppose we would need to “nuke them from orbit” as opposed to investing ground troops.
this is a dumb article
The first sentence says “Al Queda and its supporters”. It should have read “Al Queda and it’s supporter obama”.
The first sentence says “Al Queda and its supporters”. It should have read “Al Queda and its supporter obama”.
American media loves a scandal, so its easy to take out someone in leadership with a story about sex.
Only if they are disloyal scum that shouldn’t be in leadership in the first place. If you lack enough character to keep your pants on, you can’t be trusted in any other area either.
Wow, that look.........I hope Petraeus is thinking.. "You evil lying SOB, I will TAKE YOU OUT, I have met the enemy and it is YOU bozo".........
BOZO's look.........PURE EVIL SATANIC
Panetta: I'm with bozo, and I just pooped my pants.
Who is the other guy?.......worried
The evil double crossing stealth vagina...why haven’t we deployed that deadly weapon.
Screw Latin Grammys. Your tinfoil’s more interesting.
Is he really that short?
Yes, Caliph Hussein himself.
Well, now, that proves it!
Benghazi-Coward Obama File.
“Someone ran an operation to take out Patreaus, Allen, Et. Al.”
Yes, their most successful and influential agent in the West, Obama al-Hussein.
Petraeus’ dick took him out.
Uh, yeah. Which is why espionage has exploited that fact for nearly as long. So I suppose that would be Occam's Twin-Bladed Razor in this case - both factors combine into the simplest explanation.
Too many in American media enjoy vicarious sex ~ to the exclusion of any other kind too!
Unfortunately, you’re right. People want to blame the media for these kind of stories but that’s what makes money.
Patreaus may be our last hope to stop/slow the marxist-mooseslum and begin the process of saving America.
What was it Rush said the other day? "Too many generals being ruled by their privates."
I’ve seen that look before. It’s the look of a man who as just heard his boss lie. I think the fourth man is either General Dempsey or Allen, I’m not sure.
My thoughts as well, plus, I think that’s a man who just heard his boss say something that wasn’t true.
Was that taken today?
They are in uniform, so not sure when that picture was taken, but Petraeus sure has that look of "What the H.ll are you talking about", and he has his body turned into Zero.