Skip to comments.Our National Malinvestment In President Obama Will Bring Painful Consequences
Posted on 11/16/2012 8:59:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The choice for the status quo made in last weeks presidential election was an uninformed oneat no fault of the votersmade in the fog of monetary distortion and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernankes continuous campaign of disinformation.
President Barack Obama managed to overtake Republican challenger Mitt Romney on the exit poll question Who is better for the economy? and a strong majority of Obama voters felt that the economy is better off than four years ago. Indeed, anyone (particularly Bernanke) would concede that without the Feds zero interest rate policy we would be experiencing a far worse economythe true Obama-Keynesian economy.
The danger here, as we have seen in every other bust for a century or more, is that we can only suspend the laws of economics for so long. And in general we are only good at considering immediate consequences, while being very, very bad at considering later consequences. As 19th century French economist Frédéric Bastiat observed, The bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil.
In the short run (and this is what is so insidious about the Feds artificially low interest rates), all we are seeing is an illusion of economic progress. Specifically, the Fed has manufactured a distortion intended to trap both consumers into spending more and entrepreneurs into investing more, or lengthening their production periods (becoming more roundabout, as the Austrian School economists said), as if savings were more plentiful. This combination would never occur in an unhampered, noninterventionist economy for the simple fact that higher consumption would mean higher interest rates (from less savings), which would discourage longer production.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE REST....
At no fault of the voters? BS.
With the exponential increase in technology our production and hence our incomes, living standards and job opportunities etc. should have correspondingly skyrocketed as technology advancement has. Technology has increased by how many times? So should our incomes have increased. But our incomes have declined, 47 million on foodstamps, 70 million on medicaid, 6 trillion dollar debt etc. Yet many stupid liberals voted for this Obama communist who will only make it worse when it should be getting much better as tech is rising. Additionally we in the U.S.A. have the most oil, oil shale, natural gas, wood, minerals, coal , etc ( in other words we should all be millionaires instead of beggars and working for $8 an hour which we many of us are)
It is because of government regulations that are hurting businesses ability to make profits, to hire , and expand to
This is exactly what Obama wants. People just can’t bring themselves to believe that their president would actually want their economy to collapse and bankrupt millions of Americans.
What did they think when he said that his election would totally transform the American system?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.