Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
The Akron case involved a law that made it hard for minorities to protect themselves against discrimination, not to seek preferences.

I see a Traitor-Not-My-Job Roberts special ruling in our future.

It's a tax. It's a penalty. It's a fee. It's a tax.

Whatever they blackmailed Traitor John with is still out there. I would expect him to be the same sniveling weasel he is now and make up law with the four leftist judges to support affirmative action.

Otherwise he might have to miss a cocktail party with the Kardashian Kelleys. The price would be too much to bear.

7 posted on 11/17/2012 6:36:51 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokeyblue

I certainly wish the damnable law had been overturned. Looking at the glass half-full, though, I think Roberts’ ruling also did not please the leftists.

Calling the mandate a TAX leaves it wide open, it seems, to any future Congress and President to CUT TAXES by getting rid of the mandate.


8 posted on 11/17/2012 6:51:47 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek; Smokeyblue

Thanks for the ping; post. All one has to do is to look at the individual members of the “Supreme” Court and consider what collective advanced/advocated their ascendancy, and the rulings of the others who were not so obvious.

I rest my case BUMP!


10 posted on 11/17/2012 6:55:15 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson