I do not think it means what you think it means.
Posted on 11/17/2012 8:43:05 AM PST by Renfield
This week financial news organization CNBC gave some mainstream attention to the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History, in which “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners are being accused of laundering of 43 trillion dollars worth of ill gotten gains.
The lawsuit is said to involve officials located in the highest offices of government and the financial sector.
Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters.
Within hours the original page for the article was taken down, and CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were killed under very suspicious circumstances.
It seems that the murder happened first and then the page was removed later.
According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children.
However, those same mainstream news sources report the highly unlikely story that the nanny slit her own throat just after committing the homicides.
Police have released very little information and although a wider plot has not been officially implicated, it seems very possible that these murders are a show of force against the press organization for releasing such damning information about the most powerful people in the world.
Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street Journal:
“In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants. “
Some of the alleged conspirators are Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary, Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.
It is expected that all news on this subject will be removed from CNBC, and that other news organizations will be discouraged from covering such information.
However, screen shots of the original CNBC article were taken to verify the authenticity of this story.
Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda.
This is the second situation this week in which a high level executive was the victim of a suspicious attack that seemed very much like an assassination.
The Intel Hub just reported that Nicholas Mockford, a 60 year old British executive for the oil company ExxonMobil was shot dead in front of his wife in an assassination-style killing in Brussels.
We will be keeping a close eye on both of these stories and provide more details as they become available.
Note: You can read the lawsuit here.
And taxpayers have so far realized a $22 billion positive return on their investment in banks.
I never said that every single bank repaid every single dollar.
You scoffers better get the kwap out of your heads. Banks = money laundering. If ever there was a demographic that needed to feel their backs against a bullet pockmarked wall, they are it. Chronic conservative blindness about “invisible hand” banking practices is what’s wrong with the world. Read “The Creature from Jeckyl Island” and “Tragedy and Hope” if you love this country.
A trillion dollar hole as compared to over $20 billion in profits would have helped the economy? How?
And she says she had been arguing with the mother about housewife type stuff.
Bilderberg?
Good LORD! The plaintiff list is HUGE and the defendant list is HUGE.
I think this ties in to the stories across the globe about the thousands of Bankers that have quit over the last couple of years.
The complaint states that the Obama administration went on national tv and told the American people that the TARP funds had been repaid when they have not. (big surprise-Barry lies constantly.)
I pray something comes of this...perhaps this is the “wound to the head.”
Most posters here are not drooling leftists.
The choice was to crash then and quickly recover with or keep the debt piling up and crashing later and more spectacularly. Thanks to TARP, Obama (part of the McCain's loss is from rushing back to pass TARP), foreign campaign money, etc we will have the later, larger crash. Probably default, maybe some hyperinflation along with that. After that the end of American military strength, etc.
ping
IIRC, one of the neighbors, who road the elevator with the nanny a short time before, said the nanny was acting normal.
See “Benefactors, 2012 Election” I never said a word about TARP before you wandered off to it. Show me a government approved and GAP audit of TARP. You can’t.
“Banksters” is a combination of the terms Bankers and Gangsters.
http://www.amazon.com/Babylons-Banksters-Alchemy-Physics-Religion/dp/1932595791
This book should be on everyones reading list.
I was only asking. I really couldn’t care less about it.
No, that was what was claimed by the mainstream media. That women didn’t have the strength to stab herself that hard.
Massive bank failures allows recovery? Why didn't that work in the 1930s?
I wandered off to it? You may have missed it, it was mentioned in the article.
Show me a government approved and GAP audit of TARP.
Huh? The Treasury lent money to banks in exchange for preferred stock and warrants. It's not that complicated.
Unless you think $43 trillion was involved. In which case an audit wouldn't help you.
27. As of the date of filing of this First Amended Complaint, the enemies list held by the Holder-Dunn Group, their affiliates and agents and representatives — and thus subject to the foregoing illegal behavior and obstruction of justice — have included (but are not limted to): Among others, on information and belief, including in the federal enemies list supervised by the Holder-Dunn Group as set forth above are (a) Ruppert Mudock, (b) Roger Ales, (c) Fox News Network and their affiliates, agents and those acting on their behalf, (d) active members of various faith based organizations located within the jurisdictional purview of this Court in at least Brooklyn New York; and (e) active members of various faith based organizations located elsewhere in the United States (e.g, Iowa) but damaged by the fraud, theft and racketeering enterprise of Defendants in New York set forth herein; and (d) active members of various faith based organizations that openly support the United States of America’s pre-2009 stance on the unwavering support of the State of Israel and against all enemies thereof including, e.g., Iran, located in Brooklyn, New York; and (f) outspoken journalists and former agents of the Holder-Dunn Group such as (g) Neil Barofsky, (h) Shiela Bair, (i) Senator Grassley, (j) Congressman Darryl Issa, (k) Sheldon Adelson, (l) Donald Trump, (m) Steve Wynn, (n) Congressman Allen West and the Tea Party, (o) Karl Rove and his affiliated entities, (p) the Koch Bros., (q) Sean Hannity, (r) Michelle Malkin, (s) James N. Fiedler, (t) Rush Limbaugh, (q) Tucker Carlson, (r) various organizations with agendas contrary to those of the Bankster Defendants as set forth in detail above, including the Daily Caller and Judicial Council Watcher and their affiliated entities. This has devastated the Plaintiffs because the Holder-Dunn Group, et al. have diverted monies and resources due Plaintiffs and their privies away from crediting such payments against mortgage balances and loan modifications; and alternatively in favor of perpetuating the money laundering and RICO schemes set forth in this complaint.The lawsuit text refers to these targets as comprising "the Obama Administration's 'Nixonian' enemies list."
Members of the Holder-Dunn Group are identified as:
Eric Holder, Tony West, Kamala Harris, Peter Krause, Thomas Layton, Joseph Dunn, Howard Miller, Anita Dunn, Robert Bauer, Scott Drexel (collectively the “Holder-Dunn Group”). Discovery is continuing. Plaintiffs will amend this complaint accordingly as additional corrupt members of the Holder-Dunn Group are located who have stolen money from the Fed whilst they fabricated evidence against those trying to stop them. The effect in many instances was to stifle any questioning of their actions pursuant to the racketeering plan by Defendants, and each of them (operating through the conspiracy set forth herein), including, but not limited to, conducting lawless activities, illegal searches and seizures, fabricating documents, paying off witnesses, suborning perjury, and conducting other activities pursuant to the unlawful RICO enterprise in violation of State and Federal law including, but not limited to, (a) preparing bogus governmental reports regarding the matter, (b) fabricating evidence against various adversaries nationwide, (c) working hand in hand with the Bankster Defendants — Defendants, and each of them — to continue the ponzi/RICO scheme and money laundering enterprises and (d) for their own benefit, taking money personally or directing it to private entities to control so that they too could profit from the largest ponzi/RICO scheme and the largest money laundering scheme in world history. By this time, all Defendants were involved in a detailed way with the schemes described above and the involvement was active and with full knowledge of its illegality as set forth herein.I don't understand why Valerie Jarrett is not identified as a member of the Holder-Dunn group: for she is a named Defendant in this case.
I can't quite get my mind wrapped around this thing — it is so vast and complicated. But among other things alleged in this lawsuit is the massive looting of the U.S. Treasury ($20 trillion) by "puppeteer" Timothy Geitner, with the proceeds directed to the benefit of the named Defendants in this case, often to overseas accounts in countries with loose banking regulations and weak treaties with the U.S.
If the allegations set forth in this case are true, then I'd expect to see even more bodies piling up real soon.
Thanks so very much, Renfield, for posting this.
It was small banks that failed in the 1930s, not big banks; those very failures were engineered by the same class of big bankers (Banksters!) who are engineering today's massive financial frauds. Make credit easy, and encourage people to take on massive debt; then make credit difficult, driving debtors into failure, and grab collateralized assets at a fraction of their actual value (and along the way, get the taxpayers to pay the bill). This is why fractional reserve banking and the Federal Reserve were forced upon us; they are "legal" mechanisms for allowing the Rockefellers and Rothschilds to confiscate our wealth.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.