Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soaring Toward Totalitarianism
Townhall.com ^ | November 19, 2012 | Mike Adams

Posted on 11/19/2012 12:30:00 AM PST by Kaslin

(Some time in the not-too-distant future at a public university near you).

Good morning, everyone. My name is Dean Crawler and I would like to welcome everyone to new staff training here in the Dean of Student's Office at the University of Neo-Communism in Wonderland, or UNCW. I wish to welcome all returning Deans, Associate Deans, Assistant Deans, and Adjunct Deans as well. They say it takes a village to raise a child. One could say that it takes a fiefdom to raise a generation. Of course, we prefer to avoid references to Western civilization here at UNCW. We are soaring to greatness. And that means leaving past traditions behind. Even an Adjunct Dean of Diversity knows that. No offense or disrespect intended.

Our training today will focus on four new programs that will help us gain control over student dissidents in an effort to assure the smooth operation of the university. Diversity and tolerance are very complex concepts. And sometimes rigid conformity is needed to ensure their full realization. I would appreciate it if everyone would give her, his, its, or undecided's full attention while I explain these new programs:

1. No administrator left behind. We have decided to add a few new positions to help with our ever increasing workload. We will add a new Dean of Noise Complaints this semester. As you know, students often have parties off campus that result in noise complaints. We have partnered with local police to set up a system whereby all noise complaints received by police are channeled into the university administrative structure. When police answer a noise complaint off campus, we soon find out. Then we will call the student into the Dean's Office and interrogate him, her, it, or undecided concerning the alleged violation. Each violation will be recorded by the Dean's Office and will be placed in the student's permanent record. If the student complains loudly in response to interrogation, the Dean of Noise Complaints will then file a separate noise complaint with the UNCW police. This will result in the student being brought back in for further interrogation by the Dean of Noise Complaints.

2. Two strikes and you're out. All infractions will require recidivism before students can be expelled from UNCW. However, our previous policy of allowing three strikes has been modified. Now, only two strikes will be needed for expulsion. For example, an off campus noise complaint resulting in interrogation to which a student noisily complains will be sufficient for expulsion. Students will forfeit all tuition and fees paid for the duration of the semester, regardless of whether expulsion occurs before or after the official drop date for regular courses.

3. The Universal Administrative Trial Program. To date, we have employed a two-tier system for dealing with student non-conformity issues. Criminal hearings have been used as a means of dealing with criminal conduct. Administrative hearings have been used for dealing with non-criminal violations. In the latter type of hearing, students have been stripped of all needlessly cumbersome due process rights. In our collective view, the system has proved to be unworkable. Therefore, we have decided that all hearings will be classified as administrative in nature. All rights will be suspended except for cases involving sexual assault and sexual harassment. In such cases, students bringing charges will be granted a right to counsel and a right to full appellate review. Student plaintiffs will be able to appeal adverse rulings. The accused will receive no corresponding benefit. All attempts on behalf of the accused to either a) retain counsel or b) appeal an adverse ruling will be subject to the noise complaint policy. The Dean of Noise Complaints will preside over all such hearings.

4. Our New Government Respect Compact. Our Student Respect Compact was originally designed to preserve the rights of students to work in an environment free from the following: incivility, discomfort, disrespect, unwarranted intellectual challenge, and unwanted solicitation of ideas and opinions.

The policy has been modified to include the protection of administrators from all of the same invasions. For example, student complaints concerning "administrative waste" and control over "private" or "non-academic matters" are often distressing to the administration. The complaints are rarely solicited and often result in administrative discomfort. We now consider them to be uniformly disrespectful and uncivil. Any conflict between Our New Government Respect Compact and state "whistleblower" laws or the "constitution" will be resolved in the favor of Our New Government Respect Compact. Any resistance will be referred to the Dean of Noise Complaints and subject to the aforementioned policies.

The Obama administration has done a lot to move us forward. The Obama Department of Education told us that we must reduce the burden of proof in sexual assault cases to a mere preponderance of evidence. They told us we would receive no federal funds if we did not conform. We based all of our other sexual assault and sexual harassment policies on the model in place at Stanford University. We call them our Cardinal rules of sexual conformity. That great institution believes that the new Obama policies were a mere starting point - a minimum list of expectations. We agree with that philosophy.

When it comes to implementing policies that ensure administrative victory over student dissidents, we want to do more than just the minimum required by Washington. We want to stay one step ahead of the federal authorities. Not everything we do may be "constitutional" as they say. But our constitution is a living, breathing document. We are confident that the federal judiciary will share and affirm our grander vision by the time any disagreements reach that level. You all are a part of that grand vision. For those of you who are new, I welcome you into our community. For those returning, I welcome you back. And I welcome you all to move with us. Forward.

In closing, I would remind you that extremism in the defense of conformity is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of civility is no virtue.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; collegecampus; freeexpression; obamaadmin

1 posted on 11/19/2012 12:30:09 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alarm rider; Apple Pan Dowdy; BatGuano; Battle Axe; bayouranger; bboop; BenKenobi; Biggirl; ...

Mike Adams Column


Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, or removed from the ping list

2 posted on 11/19/2012 12:31:41 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Excellent!

And so very true.

At first I thought this might be satire, but recent visits to college campuses show that Mr. Adams is merely discomforting his “superiors”.

3 posted on 11/19/2012 2:31:16 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Political correctness extremes.


4 posted on 11/19/2012 2:47:05 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Diversity and tolerance are very complex concepts. And sometimes rigid conformity is needed to ensure their full realization.

Best 2 lines in the article. Leftists are mentally ill.

5 posted on 11/19/2012 3:11:23 AM PST by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Diversity and tolerance are very complex concepts. And sometimes rigid conformity is needed to ensure their full realization....

'AND OF COURSE...our child rearing university policy prohibits the appearance on our campus of conservative beauties like ANN COULTER due to:

1. Her phyical appearance.



And

2. Her inconsequencial body of work...to wit:

Ann Coulter is the author of seven New York Times bestsellers: * High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton (Regnery 1998) * Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (Crown, 2002) * Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (Crown Forum, 2003) * How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): The World According to Ann Coulter (Crown Forum, 2004) * Godless: The Church of Liberalism (Crown Forum, 2006) * If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans (Crown Forum, 2007) * Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America (Crown Forum, 2009) * Demonic (Crown Forum, 2011)

A WOMAN LIKE THAT HAS NO BUSINESS ON AN AMERICAN CAMPUS!

THANK GOD we have 'REAL WATCHDOG/THOUGHT/GESTAPO TO PROTECK OUR YOUNGSTERS.....wise parents have sent their offspring to us and i'm damned if we're gonna let 'em down!

DEAN DUMMY
6 posted on 11/19/2012 4:15:38 AM PST by jimsin (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimsin

I’d appreciate it if you would not highjack this article, what is obvious that you are trying to do. It has absolutely nothing to do with Ann Coulter


7 posted on 11/19/2012 4:23:16 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for the ping.

Bump.


8 posted on 11/19/2012 4:30:37 AM PST by upchuck (America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

However, what happened when Ann Coulter was invited to speak at Fordham University, and was “disinvited” (under extreme pressure from the Fordham President, is an example in support of Mike Adam’s point.
http://collegeinsurrection.com/2012/11/fordham-struggles-to-defend-condemning-ann-coulter-while-embracing-infanticide-supporter-peter-singer/


9 posted on 11/19/2012 5:21:42 AM PST by Bonneville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; jimsin

I think the article has a great deal to do with the coercive enforcement of PC on campus, of which the recent disinviting of Coulter at Fordham is an outstanding example.


10 posted on 11/19/2012 5:44:32 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

While totalitarianism elsewhere has been carried out on a budget, the US variety is uniquely expensive, and as such, may carried the seeds to its own demise.

Truthfully, America is tired of being the world’s policeman, and if some tyrant wants war with another tyrant, it really isn’t our job to intervene, unless their bloodshed threatens to spill out into other nations.

Likewise, do we really need 16 major intelligence agencies and over a hundred federal police agencies? Do the non-police agencies actually *need* their own SWAT teams?

Do we need to monitor all communications by everyone at all times? Are our lives enriched and improved by requiring every cell phone to act as a GPS tracking device? Is our nation deprived unless foot thick dossiers exist about all citizens, that we must all carry papers to travel about, that we must have our genitalia fondled because foreigners in other countries threaten us?

And it’s all terribly expensive.

I suppose one drawback to a government sponsored economic depression is that eventually the funds will run out for a lot of this oppression. And unlike other nations secret police, who just obey orders for minimum wage, our secret police want the big bucks. They’re unionized.

Maybe someday we will learn that just because we have the technology to be intrusive voyeurs, doesn’t mean we should be.


11 posted on 11/19/2012 7:06:06 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

... And no Ann Coulter...

...or anti-Obama shirts...


12 posted on 11/19/2012 7:29:30 AM PST by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson