Skip to comments.Adding up the evidence … to a stolen election
Posted on 11/19/2012 4:56:51 PM PST by Mozilla
Ah, the marvels of modern technology! Computers, Internet, mobile devices! Things that make life easier in this day and age. But this cyber technology also can be used for evil gain too, right? Especially when it comes to elections.
As writer Daniel Greenfield posted, Half the Democratic ground game is voter turnout. The other half is voter fraud. Voter ID would make an impact on this game, but that would be just like the return of segregation or something.
Take a look at these headlines:
In Florida: Obama Got Over 99% in Broward County Precincts
What Luck! Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote
Good News: Obama Won County in Ohio with 108% Voter Registration
BREAKING: St. Lucie County, Florida Had 141.1% Turnout; Obama Won County
Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors Were Removed; Turnout Somehow 30% Above Govt Numbers
Out of 175,554 registered voters, 247,713 vote cards were cast in St. Lucie County, Florida, on Tuesday
What to make of it?
The assault on liberty we witnessed Tuesday, as was the case in 2008, was led primarily by those on urban ObamaNation Plantations, those who depend on what Obama calls redistributive justice from the rest of us in order to survive, [Mark] Alexander said. They account for almost 60 percent of Obamas constituents, and socialist Democrats are masters of co-opting (read: buying) their allegiance and getting them to the polls. The good news is that about 10 million fewer Obama voters showed up in 2012, despite his billion-dollar campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
More reason to prove Obama committed fraud.
As someone who has voted in nearly every election, large and small, since I was old enough to vote—I now feel like there is no point. This is what we are handing to our children? What a theft of their future. My anger at the GOP is immeasurable. Their cowardice is inexcusable.
The States which implemented Voter ID should not have acquiesced to the courts OR Eric Holder. Isn’t this a State’s right? That the legislative process determines election procedures NOT the courts or the DOJ? It was a HUGE mistake for the States to cave on Voter ID. Voter fraud cost Romney the election.
I also need more than a few random links and top of the head explanations. All these grand conspiracies fall apart when you start looking as to what would actually be required to carry them out. For voter fraud to have been rigged towards Obama to the extent it reflected swing state and national polls it would have to be an incredibly well planned, top down effort. And I can’t see how they all could have coordinated that without someone blowing the whistle.
When history is written of this era, the media will be a major complicit shame to our country, second only to Obama himself.
How can a national poll identify a cadre of the faithful intending to bus van loads of individuals to multiple polling locations. How much top down planning does it take for Democrats to kick GOP poll watchers off the premises so they can commit fraud. Did you hear the Obama minions tell us they would win the election no matter what it takes? Alinsky tactics don't need direct top down control. The radical left has been telling us for at least fifty years what they are up to.
THE GREATEST BARRIER to communication between myself and would be
organizers arises when I try to get across the concept that tactics are
not the product of careful cold reason, that they do not follow a table of
organization or plan of attack. Accident, unpredictable reactions to your
own actions, necessity, and improvisation dictate the direction and nature
of tactics. Then, analytical logic is required to appraise where you are,
what you can do next, the risks and hopes that you can look forward to. It
is this analysis that protects you from being a blind prisoner of the tactic
and the accidents that accompany it. But I cannot overemphasize that the
tactic itself comes out of the free flow of action and reaction, and requires
on the part of the organizer an easy acceptance of apparent disorganization.
Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky
The extent of the tentacles of Chicago politics being helped along by the likes of Soros and other communist oriented elected officials still has not sunk in with over 50% of the population.
Where have you been? TROLLING ?
This kind of information has been ALL OVER THE PLACE. You just need to go looking.
And that’s the true horror and sheer madness of our sad situation!
The great 'community organizer' has roots deep in ACORN and other 'civic organizations' including any 'church' preaching Black Liberation theology.
Is it possible? yes.
Who would break ranks when they might have an 'accident'?
After all these are the true believers who would use "any means necessary" to retain power.
It wouldn't be the first dead body to be attributable to someone wanting to keep something quiet, either.
Note, too, even if someone came forward, that the probability of any of the ABCNNBCBS and other liberal networks breaking the story which would likely result in civil unrest (at a minimum) is virtually nil.
I think threats of rioting are keeping most of the 'pubbies mum, too, especially because it would take half a heartbeat for the liberal media to build on the 'Republicans are just old, rich, white people who are out to disenfranchise minorities' meme they've been crafting in the mainstream media for over a year. Media are all about impressions, appearances, and selling soap, and riots would just give them a pile of if it bleeds it leads material.
Who would think that either the treason in Benghazi or the neglect of Sandy victims would not be news, either, but that would make deer leeder look bad, so don't look for it on the prime time network news.
So you are waking up. Smell the coffe?
In spite of all the reports of fraud, some of which are undoubtedly true, I still don’t know how anyone can say the election was definitely stolen. How can it be determined that the votes lost by fraud were not made up for by the true vote margin?
We know a lot more now than we did several years ago, and I believe our efforts would be best spent continuing the effort against all forms and shapes of voter fraud, rather than investigating all instances of suspected fraud. We could never be sure we got enough of them until we reach a total larger than the margin of victory. Maybe we could prove some for the PR effect. That would be helpful in putting the other side on notice and alerting our own side to the danger.
But also, let’s put our lessons to work. Nip the fraudsters in the bud next time if we can. My opinion.
The problem with only trying to prevent voter fraud in the future is that the message from the left is: you can’t prove voter fraud in the past, so why should we try to prevent fraud if it doesn’t exist?
That’s why it’s so important to prove any cases of voter fraud that we can.
And the mainstream media went down to King County to report on its alleged “racism”.
We never hear about black racism against whites. I was hoping that one good thing would come from Obama’s 2008 election - that we could put away some of the racial tension in the US. That was a pipe-dream. Obama is a race and class baiter. In my experience working in a large, very diverse organization, many blacks have become overtly hostile towards whites in any type of authority, particularly since Obama’s re-election 2 weeks ago. Blacks are refusing to attend meetings, follow rules, or take training that everyone has to take. I see white supervisors afraid to address it, for fear of EEO charges being filed against them, which is only making it worse.
That's because it doesn't exist.
By definition, that is.
Now, "black rage", that's something different. And that's OK, again by definition.