Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mozilla

In spite of all the reports of fraud, some of which are undoubtedly true, I still don’t know how anyone can say the election was definitely stolen. How can it be determined that the votes lost by fraud were not made up for by the true vote margin?

We know a lot more now than we did several years ago, and I believe our efforts would be best spent continuing the effort against all forms and shapes of voter fraud, rather than investigating all instances of suspected fraud. We could never be sure we got enough of them until we reach a total larger than the margin of victory. Maybe we could prove some for the PR effect. That would be helpful in putting the other side on notice and alerting our own side to the danger.

But also, let’s put our lessons to work. Nip the fraudsters in the bud next time if we can. My opinion.


35 posted on 11/20/2012 3:00:27 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand

The problem with only trying to prevent voter fraud in the future is that the message from the left is: you can’t prove voter fraud in the past, so why should we try to prevent fraud if it doesn’t exist?

That’s why it’s so important to prove any cases of voter fraud that we can.


36 posted on 11/20/2012 3:23:29 AM PST by HopeSprings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson