Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Media’s Benghazi Scandal
Commentary ^ | 11/20/2012 | Peter Wehner

Posted on 11/21/2012 11:22:24 AM PST by mojito

....In the Benghazi story, we have four dead Americans. A lack of security that borders on criminal negligence. No apparent effort was made to save the lives of Messrs. Woods and Doherty, despite their pleas. The Obama administration, including the president, gave false and misleading accounts of what happened despite mounting evidence to the contrary. And the person who was wrongly accused of inciting the attacks by making a crude YouTube video is now in prison. Yet the press has, for the most part, treated this story with ambivalence and reluctance. A reliable barometer of the views of the elite media is Tom Friedman of the New York Times, who said on Meet the Press on Sunday, “To me, Libya is not a scandal, it’s a tragedy.”

Here’s the thing, though. If the exact same incidents had occurred in the exact same order, and if it had happened during the watch of a conservative president, it would be a treated as a scandal. An epic one, in fact. The coverage, starting on September 12 and starting with Mr. Friedman’s newspaper, would have been nonstop, ferociously negative, and the pressure put on the president and his administration would have been crushing. Jon Stewart, the moral conscience of an increasing number of journalists, wouldn’t have let this story die.

(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghazigate; benghazimedia; cincinnati; corruption; drivebymedia; obama; pravdamedia; press
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: mojito

If we just ignored them the would just go away


21 posted on 11/21/2012 2:03:49 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Re: my earlier post. It goes without saying there was no attack based on what “Benghazi Attackers” watch on TV or YOUTUBE which makes the above claim all the more outrageous.


22 posted on 11/21/2012 2:08:17 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mojito

23 posted on 11/21/2012 2:22:21 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Good evening.

There will come a point when journalist will need Blackwater 24/7/365. Heck, Limbaugh and Beck are not journalist, and they need round the clock security.

Methinks we are getting close, very close to the first one of them who goes down.

5.56mm

24 posted on 11/21/2012 2:41:54 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

placmark.


25 posted on 11/21/2012 11:12:30 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mojito; MestaMachine
Thanks to both of you. Is sad for our nation when people are left behind by the cic. Have great difficulty not being overwhelmed when realizing the cic zer0 still holds power over our Military Women and Men. He and democRATS hate our Military. Is probably only a matter of time before additional setups to harm and murder more of America's Military Personnel. Lord, and our drive-bys are congratulating themselves for getting zer0 reelected. No honor or love of country from the drive-bys. What a mess, and with nobody to clean up this mess, expect a greater mess.
26 posted on 11/22/2012 8:43:39 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

27 posted on 11/22/2012 8:53:56 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

28 posted on 11/22/2012 8:55:51 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: timestax

29 posted on 11/22/2012 8:58:17 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: timestax

30 posted on 11/22/2012 9:05:09 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: timestax

31 posted on 11/22/2012 9:11:47 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: timestax

32 posted on 11/22/2012 9:14:50 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: timestax
OUR CORRUPTION DOESN'T COUNT


33 posted on 11/22/2012 9:19:54 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: timestax

34 posted on 11/22/2012 9:23:31 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: timestax

35 posted on 11/22/2012 9:25:50 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: timestax

36 posted on 11/22/2012 9:27:56 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: timestax

37 posted on 11/22/2012 9:30:02 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: timestax

38 posted on 11/22/2012 9:32:24 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: timestax

39 posted on 11/22/2012 9:34:41 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: timestax

40 posted on 11/22/2012 9:36:16 AM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson