Skip to comments.The Death of American Religion
Posted on 11/21/2012 1:25:48 PM PST by Kaslin
In the aftermath of the re-election of President Barack Obama, conservatives searched the heavens and the earth for answers. Some suggested that Mitt Romney lost because Republicans didn't reach out more to Latino voters; some suggested that Romney lost because his "get out the vote" system fell apart on Election Day. Romney himself said that he lost because President Obama separated voting groups with particularly calibrated "gifts" designed to curry their favor.
In truth, Mitt Romney lost for the same reason that traditional marriage lost on Election Day: America is becoming a less religious country. And that bodes ill for the future of the United States.
It's not that religious voters didn't turn out for Romney. They did in droves. Fully 26 percent of voters -- 3 percent more than in 2004 -- were white evangelicals who supported Romney 79 to 21. Fifty-three percent of the electorate identified as Protestant; another 25 percent identified as Catholic.
But a full 40 percent of voters attended church or synagogue rarely; 17 percent of voters never attended church or synagogue at all. Indeed, 12 percent of the voting base didn't report a religious affiliation at all. That adds up to 69 percent of the population. And this population broke for Barack Obama.
This isn't to argue that secular people can't be good, hard-working Americans; the vast majority of them are. It isn't to argue, either, that they don't vote Republican; many of them do. But the increasing secularization of America means the increasing importance of the state in American life. For generations, the religious community looked to two sources for inspiration and support in times of crisis: God and fellow members of the community. The secular community looks to one source: the state. Where the religious believer understands that it is immoral to deprive someone else of their property by force, even when such stealing is given legal cover by the state, the secularist believes that the morality of redistributionism takes precedence over the morality of respect for the rights of others. The same folks who voted for gay marriage and abortion voted for a broad expansion of the state and for higher tax rates.
That's not because Republicans are pro-life and pro-traditional marriage; even if Republicans ignored the issues -- as, indeed, Mitt Romney tried to do -- secularists would still link a larger state with a pro-abortion, pro-same sex marriage position. That's because the same position that rejects the sanctity of unborn life tends to reject the sanctity of private property; both are based on the John Locke-ian premise that man is special in the universe, and that the product of his labor is an extension of his special place in the universe. Ignore man's Godly origins and his property becomes a dispensable commodity rather than a fulfillment of a divine mission.
More than that, the religious society rests on two fundamental principles: personal responsibility and belief in responsibility to future generations. Secularism rejects both principles. Personal responsibility becomes societal responsibility in the secular view; we are all shaped by our genetics and our environment, both of which are out of our control. How, then, can we be held responsible for our actions? As for responsibility to future generations, the prophet of modern day leftist economics, John Maynard Keynes, summed it up best: "In the long run, we are all dead." Tap out the public treasury now, and grab your redistributionist cash for there is no kingdom of heaven -- and you won't be around to reap the consequences of your decisions.
Perhaps libertarianism is a solution. But historically, it hasn't been. Every godless society has turned radically to the left. There are religious societies that turn to the left, too -- Islamic societies tend toward Marxist economic schemes -- but the traditional Judeo-Christian philosophy has forwarded capitalism.
So, can American society survive its turn to secularism? It can, but only in a different form -- a more European form. The best hope for a return to fundamental American principles is a return to the fundamental American philosophy embodied on our coinage: E Pluribus Unum on one side, In God We Trust on the other.
When mainstream Christians allowed the socialists to corrupt their churches the end was inevitable.
Once sex, drunkenness, perversion of all kinds are no longer considered bad or evil by society, but rather accepted - it’s game over man.
I think that happened more than 4 years ago tho - just sayin
Sex isn’t bad or evil.
The problem is not the death of religion in America, it is that religions for too long tried to imagine they had greater numbers of congregants who were *nominally* religious, rather than people who actually embraced their faith, who are their actual numbers.
Take Catholicism, for example. Despite instruction from their bishops and priests, slightly less than half the total number of people thought as Catholic actually *were* Catholic.
The rest are “secular” Catholics, who for what ever reason still call themselves Catholic, or even imagine themselves as Catholic, but who clearly are not.
And every religion in America could be divided this way.
In truth, America is much, much more secular than it lets on. But if religions could brace themselves and purge those who are not religious from their ranks, they would find that the true faith of those remaining is much greater.
Such a purge would be good for all concerned. If people are truly not religious, then they should not burden their lives with religion, burdening also religious people who do believe.
But at the same time, it forces those who are secular to reexamine their lives. Many of them need to be “out in the cold” to realize that they actually need to be religious, and should be religious. That they have been remiss in their faith and spirituality.
I have a question. It is an honest question. I don't want an argument, just to understand.
If you believe what you wrote, why do you waste time reading and posting on a site such as Free Republic?
I thought that was established by David in Psalm 8, not Locke.
marxism is atheistic materialism. The country is more than half way there.
This is part of the problem, Americans are too obsessed with the Enlightenment.
The Enlightenment had some of its merits, but it’s also the same intellectual wellspring which totalitarianism and the French Revolution emerged from.
Western Civilization is far older than the Modern Era, and we should be proud of our history prior to the 18th Century.
I'm thinking not being in the majority was expected. I voted for Romney, but I can't say I was surprised by the result nor by the follow on call for the R party to jettison its remaining moral positions and chase the mob.
If you do it right, it's not.
There's nothing new under the sun.
I think about that when I see, "A nation divided cannot stand", attributed to A. Lincoln. He may have said it but he certainly did not originate it.
Romney lost because the GOP turned its back to conservatives.
The Republican Party will lose next election if they fail to run a conservative candidate.
once sex is brought out of the bedroom, publicly displayed and perverted it is
I watched a fascinating movie last night. It was called The Separation. It was about a Muslim family and centered around a civil/criminal dispute conducted before a Sharia arbitrator.
What came through to me was how a fear of God or Allah pervades their legal system and society. This movie was not about Muslim extremism just two supposedly typical families dealing with a heart wrenching dispute.
Whatever one thinks about Sharia law, the movie brought home that theme of divine retribution and how America no longer fears God. The Separation was one of the best movies I’ve seen in a long time. It’s at Netflix.
He sees nothing left to do but vent and lament?
Only if done with the same gender, which is getting more popular daily.
Not just accepted but celebrated and promoted, as in public schools. We are a lost nation.
Apparently evangelicals didn't have a problem with Mitt's Mormonism as some predicted. I wonder, though, if non-religious moderates and independents may have been spooked by it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.