Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

The battle over homosexuality has been won by the other side.

They have now moved on to pederasty.

They will use the same arguments (love, consent, human pleasure, not your concern, our side hates, the Bible is mean and a fantasy, etc.) and in about 15 years, the same Middle America which now can articulate no argument against homosexuality will come to also accept pederasty as healthy, wholesome, normal, and natural.

After that, pedophilia. And then, beastiality.

1960 — no-fault divorce, infidelity are okay,
but homosexuality is disgusting
1990 — homosexuality is okay but pederasty
is disgusting
2030 — pederasty is okay but non-consenting
pedophilia is disgusting
2040 — pedophilia is loving and healthy for
the child, but zoophilia is disgusting
2050 — it feels good and is healthy for both
girl and boy and horse and sheep

Here it comes folks. Can you articulate why sex
inside the faithful marriage under God is the only
acceptable form of sexual practice? Can you articulate
this to the non-believer, using reasoning he will
accept?


14 posted on 11/21/2012 2:05:11 PM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mbarker12474

You nailed it.


23 posted on 11/21/2012 2:38:00 PM PST by TheDon (In 2012, American voters chose European style big gov't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474
Can you articulate why sex inside the faithful marriage under God is the only acceptable form of sexual practice? Can you articulate this to the non-believer, using reasoning he will accept?

You propose to get an unbeliever to accept what the Bible ("just a book") says about what "real people" should do with their lives. Why do you think we've lost and will continue to lose? If you don't care what the Bible says on the subject, then any such counterargument is irrelevant.

29 posted on 11/21/2012 2:47:21 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474

The battle over homosexuality has been won by the other side.

They have now moved on to pederasty.

&&&
Bingo!

I agree with all that you said except your timetable, as I believe all of this will move at a much faster rate.


39 posted on 11/21/2012 4:09:08 PM PST by Bigg Red (Sorry, Mr. Franklin, I guess we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474

I can offer a historical argument.

In the AD 60s the Roman Emperor Nero married another man. He then did it again some years later. This was in a civilized, urban, technologically sophisticated, completely pagan culture where almost anything went theologically and where Christians were not only a minimal factor, they were being fed to the lions.

It didn’t catch on. My question to liberals always is...why not? Why did the Empire eventually turn Christian, instead of following in Nero’s stead?

I submit because whether people admit or not, whether we can theologically explain it or not, there is *something* inherently self-destructive about homosexuality which ends up collapsing in on itself. *If* it worked, it would have securely established itself all over the world long before now. It hasn’t. There is some contrary pressure against it—a pressure that is not rooted in theology but rooted perhaps in human nature itself.


43 posted on 11/21/2012 4:47:54 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson