Skip to comments.Schultz expects more voter fraud arrests in Iowa
Posted on 11/22/2012 6:13:59 PM PST by FreeAtlantaEdited on 11/22/2012 7:24:09 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
click here to read article
I don’t have to guess which way the frauds voted.
It’s always DemoncRAT.
Sgt Schultz will arrest? And then what? An election re-do like we forced the Ukraine a few years back? Yes, WE did, dude! But never here in this paradise of perfection!
Which explains the tantrum they threw over the citizenship question that was on Michigan ballot applications till just a few weeks before the election.
Good for Iowa ,, but we all know the majority of fraud comes from RAT poll workers voting near the end of the day using the names in their register that didn’t turn out...
Is that a true case?
Has Mark Levin commented on that report
The case is the Democratic National Committee vs. the Republican National Committee, originally from 1982.
If this is true then this is legal voter disenfranchisement.
This means that in any district, where it’s 51% or more
minority, it can and most likely will default to the
democrats. No wonder the voting machines were
automatically defaulting to Obama. The fix has always been
in and the democrats have been flat out cheating since 1982.
Our country has been hijacked by falsely elected representatives
who have been legislating against the will of the people.
All with the help of the complicit mainstream media. This
is Coup d’état and high treason.
Until each and every state comes up with a voter id law with some teeth in it, and then ENFORCES it, elections will continue to be an effort in futility for the honest people of this country.
An election official actually doing something about voter fraud. Who knew!
Yeesir, and these are the precinct with >85% turnout when the average is 60.
(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;
What the FFFFFFFFF.
Thanks FreeAtlanta. Great post.
So much for the black areas not showing up because they were mad at Obama because of homosexual marriage and special favors for homosexuals. I would think the black clergy that told their flock to not vote for Obama would be a little ticked or worried.
Only if they knew. And who’s going to tell them?
I love the sound of “Felony Indictments.”
“So much for the black areas not showing up”
I don’t think it matters if the voters there actually show up or not.
Many, many precincts with 99.99% for The One and 7 votes for “other” and 99% turnout does not mean that the place was hopping with voters.
In most cases the fraud takes place when the counting is done.
I remember reading about the way it was done in Detroit in 04. When republican observers complained about blatant fraud they were removed by police. A quick injunction ordered them back in but they were locked out anyway.
The observers said they were openly throwing votes for Bush in the trash and filling in empty democrat slots on ballots.
Why not ask him?