himself from the pledge might hurt him in his
bid for re-election in 2014, but said he's
not concerned about it...& lying about it.
if the TEA Party is active in GA, he'll be toast..
two strikes against him.
Posted on 11/23/2012 9:49:41 AM PST by paul544
A top Republican senator is casting aside an anti-tax pledge he signed, saying that solving the country’s looming fiscal crisis is more important than honoring the decades-old pact.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/23/top-republican-senator-distances-himself-from-norquist-anti-tax-pledge/#ixzz2D4Kn2EtO
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
In other words, it’s okay to play the role of tax collector for ‘Rat Profligate Spending.
Chambliss swerved to the left long before the DemocRATS’ held the last presidential “election”.
Says he cares more about the country than the pledge. B.S. on both fronts. GA voters will be smart to get rid of him in the 2014 primary.
Chambliss is right : Solving the country’s looming fiscal crisis is very important.
So why does he want to make it worse by raising taxes?
I think he has been having too many drinks with his demorat pals.
If he wants to solve the crisis, fight Obamacare, Fight raising taxes, propose spending cuts, straighten out the EPA close the Department of Energy and Dept.Education close about half the government agencies in DC.—Ground Air Force One and Michelle’s plane.Stop all Foreign aid.
If government employee/contractor/vendor/welfare spending is not cut (welfare is almost equal to the entire deficit), then tax policy changes will not help anything.
If the changes result in less revenue, the deficit grows faster.
If the changes result in more revenue, it’s just spent anyway.
Back during Reagan’s terms, the relative size of government debt to Gross Domestict Product was about 40%. Now it’s over 100%. The prosperity boost that lower taxes provided to the economy back then was not overshadowed by a Federal government that was insolvent on such a grand scale as it is today.
IMHO, the only way out is radical reduction of goverernment agencies. Social Security and Medicare need not be affected at all to fix this, nor should they be for those at or close to retirement. For those younger than that, they should be given the option to not participate in the program and it should be phased out for younger citizens over decades.
Norquist is a dhimmi.
Chambliss was one of the biggest supporters of McCain-Kennedy Illegal Alien Amnesty a few years ago...so no surprise he will go Big Government Liberal on the “Fiscal Cliff”
I heard this on CNN this morning. I’ve just finished writing a scathing email to him telling him that I’m done with his RINO ass and will be donating heavily to his next Primary Challenger. He is a disgrace to Georgia, a goddam poweratti too esconced in his own little power-world now.
He only won in 2008 because most Georgians tend to vote Republican. His Republican Primary opponent will get all my support when his time comes for judgement. He’s nothing but a backsliding RINO bastard. I’m tired of having to reach-back and email bitch-slap him.
Have studied norquist a bit recently, and not certain what to make of him. Strange person, norquist is. He could be a democRAT plant, yet not certain. democRATS always want more money, so democRATS can pay money out to certain democRAT voters. Republicans always make deals with democRATS to cut spending, if a tax increase is granted with bipartisanship and the spending cuts never come. Thus, there is the cliff. Am against raising taxes on a few, to pay democRAT voters to continue to vote for RATS. Thus, where does one go? Over the cliff time will come unless spending is cut and the debt is paid. Over the cliff maybe will come no matter what is decided. The only comfort am taking from this looming fight is one day the checks which go out from our government will be no good. To tell the truth, that comfort is not a comfort. norquist? No sure he is on anyones side, or maybe he is with the enemy on the outside? Do know one thing, as a fact. norquist is married to a moslem.
A backstabbing poweratti RINO. He and Isakson got bitch-slapped by the recoil fromt he voters and changed their tunes. This latest RINO appeasement shows it didn’t change their hearts. Look for “I never met an elected office I wouldn’t run for” Isakson to follow suit.
As a born and bred Georgian of generations going back to the Civil War, I am against Chambliss’ and Isakson’s cowardly backsliding. They attempted to sell this country down the river with Bush and McCain years ago on illegals and they both (Johnny will follow Saxby) are just plain cowards that don’t want to work for their constituents.
I am against taxing hardworking, net-tax paying citizens soley to keep the entitlements flowing to no-good frigging leeches that don’t add one ounce of value to this country and never will. I am against gutting our military with sequestration so that another insolvent minority (just out of bankruptcy) can buy another house to live Obama’s American-Islamic Socialist dream. If this means ‘cliff’ then so frigging be it. I’d sooner see it burned.
“During the Vietnam War, Chambliss received student deferments and was also given a medical deferment (1-Y) for bad knees due to a football injury.[4]” yet ANOTHER PUSSY COWARD!
Lets start with how much a budget really should be, not the inflated last years
version.
Then put the cuts first in line. Once reached , then revenues can be generated
by smart changes to deductions.
Leave rates alone.......
Yes, the key to all of this is even if we America loving patriots that actually pay taxes and foot the collective bill for America accede to allowing taxes to be raised on us even more egregiously, all in the name of reducing debt, the Democrats will NEVER reduce entitlement spending; they will most certainly increase it like Obama did in 2011 by adding $1.03 Trillion in entitlement spending over 83 programs.
Like I said, I’d rather see it all burn than to continue this pointless allegiance to what this country used to be, all in the name of ‘fairness’.
No.
But the GOP does need to stop this idiotic “no taxes” pledge.
Taxes are a very useful weapon, just as the Democrats show us repeatedly.
There’s all manner of tax breaks that the GOP could eliminate - eg, for Hollywood and film production, for example. There’s tax breaks for charitable foundations that could be eliminated that would stop a whole host of left-wing funding. There are opportunities for draining the endowments of left-wing indoctrination factories at universities.
All possible through the tax system.
Give the liberals what they want... good and hard.
Not surprising.
People keep saying they want moderates- well folks — this is what you get. Rino’s.
Keep an eye on these people - they’ll be all over the place the closer to the next election we get. I have a long memory because I keep notes and I won’t forget.
I for one will not vote anything other than conservative next election. No more rubber-spined politicians passing themselves off as Republicans!
I think there will be a tax on earned income over $1 million.
Who better can GA put up in 2014?
Indeed. As was Johnny Isackson (sp?). Chambliss is an embarrassment to the State of Georgia.
Good for Chambliss. It’s more than OBVIOUS, even on this site, that Americans are not ready to make the sacrifices needed to get spending down to the level of present taxation.
Even here, older people will not EVEN CONSIDER reforming their welfare programs (i.e., Social Security and Medicare), if it might mean one less dime of goodies for them.
Well, I see my kids being hit with over a trillion dollars of new debt every year. I also know that my 401k’s and IRAs are about to get seized by the government to pay for these goodies. So if Saxby is willing to start having people (including conservatives here) start paying for the level of services that they DEMAND, then I wish him the best of luck.
I say give the rats everything they want for now. It will either kill them or kill America (which is more probable) but at least we can rise like the Phoenix in 4 years with no opposition. I’m sure the Lord will keep an eye on us!
We don’t need Grahamesty II, but Chambliss is well on his way there, started out Conservative, but has had the GOP lobotomy.
Social security is the epitome of a Ponzi scheme and, as such, is immoral. Whether we want to or not, we will get rid of both it and MediCare (Obamacare). We are bankrupt! Do the math. Programs like them are unsustainable - and a key element of Socialism. They seem fantastic until we “run out of other people’s money,” to quote Margaret Thatcher.
I’d like to see a primary challenger go up against Chambliss.
The Norquist pledge defines any increase in the tax base ( for example, by closing loopholes) as a tax increase. We need another Reagan-era Grand Bargain, like the 1986 tax reform, that lowers tax rates in exchange for tax-code simplification that closes loopholes.
The two Senator we have are WORTHLESS
Mixed feelings. I believe in a tax pledge, but Grover Noquist is a Sharia-apologist and pro-amnesty douchebag, and I would be happy to see him blacklisted by the GOP and conservatives.
No mention of Herman Cain here.
You just mentioned him!
Your views are characterstic of a RINO, or maybe a CINO.
What is happening here? How could any conservative think that America has more to lose by going over the cliff than by having Republicans “reach across the aisle”?
To: paul544
Mixed feelings. I believe in a tax pledge, but Grover Noquist is a Sharia-apologist and pro-amnesty douchebag, and I would be happy to see him blacklisted by the GOP and conservatives.
32 posted on 11/23/2012 12:58:03 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
//////////////////////
Thank you! You get a gold star for saying what needed to be said about soft-jihad-sympathizer Grover Norquist (or, is that el-Guruuver Norqist).
If we cannot advocate lower taxes without invoking his name, we have no hope. We need the lower taxes, not the leadership of a man married to a Muslim Palestinian woman and ... well, he is human, after all.
Which brings up another concern: Norquist and Newsmax are joined at the hip.
It is strange how folks — e.g., Pat Dollard, Gateway Pundit, and Rick Perry — who otherwise seem to get the Muslim threat from within to some extent — are somehow associated with either Norquist or Newsmax in some way.
Makes no sense.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/smearing_geller_on_perry.html
“Chambliss swerved to the left long before the DemocRATS’ held the last presidential “election”.”
The longer Republican politicians spend in Washington, the more opportunities to fall to temptation. Chambliss must have a juicy FBI file. Holder is a master at applying the squeeze.
“Chambliss swerved to the left long before the DemocRATS’ held the last presidential “election”.”
The longer Republican politicians spend in Washington, the more opportunities to fall to temptation. Chambliss must have a juicy FBI file. Holder is a master at applying the squeeze.
It’s more what he represents than who he is. I don’t think %99.9 of those who sign that pledge no much about him.
Yeah but Chambliss didn’t bother to make that distinction. He was all about being as brazen as possible to make a point. He either doesn’t plan to run for reelection or has no fear of losing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.