Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nwrep
We keep repeating this bromide, but where is the evidence that the establishment was calling the shots? If anything, I would say that in the last couple of years, the establishment has taken a back seat to the tea party, and the candidates have all taken positions favorable to the tea party. In fact, Romney's position on immigration was the closest to the tea party position, and farthest away from the establishment RINO position.

I think they're focusing on Romney's background, his style and strategy, and the positions he took earlier in his career.

The problem with the argument is that it wasn't moderates or the Establishment that cost Republicans Senate seats in Missouri or Indiana.

32 posted on 11/25/2012 11:45:20 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: x
The problem with the argument is that it wasn't moderates or the Establishment that cost Republicans Senate seats in Missouri or Indiana.

Hello again, FRiend. Can it be established that the RNC offered anything like substantial financial support to Mourdock in Indiana? And Akins in Missouri was excoriated and abandoned for his mistake -- it was the voters, not the Party, who rallied around him.

I realize there was a problem with 'Rat crossovers and secret Trojan support from Claire McCaskill during the Missouri nomination contest (someone explained that McCaskill is basically Satan), but once nominated, he certainly didn't attract support from the Party, especially after he misspoke.

34 posted on 11/25/2012 11:53:19 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson