Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau
You can't change the definition to fit the circumstance.

The left changes the definitions of things all the time. Why would they stop at marriage? Now, I'm with you in believing that words have meaning; and two guys indulging in "gay" sex, is not a marriage; no matter how hard they want to believe that it is.

But, the reality is that the Left is allowed to change the definition of any circumstances that they want and if you complain, they will have a handy name to call you which will be quite nasty.

25 posted on 11/25/2012 2:47:58 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

I would hate to see the definition of marriage change. However the state of marriage has already deteriorated to the point that gay marriage can’t mean much. Afterall think of how the practice of living together his become commonplace, and the number of divorces has grown by leaps and bounds. The married state is not the respected or permanent institution used to be.

And if Gallup is right and only 3.4 percent of the population is gay then it tells me that mother nature has decreed that heterosexual sex will always be vastly preferred as a biological imperative. So if the definition of marriage is changed I
Will take comfort in the fact that gay marriages will always be a tiny minority of the population. And it would something of a blessing take the subject off the table so the gays will finally SHUT UP.


28 posted on 11/25/2012 3:45:29 PM PST by Hound of the Baskervilles ("Nonsense in the intellect draws evil after it." C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson