Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Jeeves
"independent contractors" = no benefits and even less job security. Might be good for the employer, but awful for the employee.
15 posted on 11/26/2012 10:00:43 AM PST by teflon9 (Political campaigns should follow Johnny Mercer's advice--Accentuate the positive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: teflon9

“”independent contractors” = no benefits and even less job security. Might be good for the employer, but awful for the employee. “

I think this depends on how it is structured and the type of work. It can be beneficial for both sides and I can see more folks doing this as obamacare rolls in, well, depending on what the exchanges look like and what employers do regarding buying insurance or paying the penalty.


25 posted on 11/26/2012 10:15:48 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: teflon9
"independent contractors" = no benefits and even less job security. Might be good for the employer, but awful for the employee.

Companies will pay a much higher hourly rate to someone they know they can part with easily if times get tough. Being an employee, especially if a union member, does nothing but set you a maximum salary limit, regardless of your ability.

Job security is a nonsensical concept in these times - there is none.

33 posted on 11/26/2012 10:27:51 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson