Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's weak air war, Iowa edition (Obama ran 13,000 more commercials even though outspent)
Politico ^

Posted on 11/26/2012 10:34:23 AM PST by Arthurio

By ALEXANDER BURNS | 11/26/12 10:54 AM EST

Via Hohmann, the Des Moines Register reports on the huge sums both presidential campaigns spent in the last weeks of the 2012 race -- and OFA's consistent advantage on the air in spite of Romney's money:

"Together, the campaigns and their allies averaged nearly $1 million a day in new TV spending in swing-state Iowa from Oct. 1 to Election Day. Several polls in the frenzied final weeks had shown a neck-and-neck battle in Iowa.

Romney and the outside groups backing him spent $21.5 million in the final five weeks, essentially matching their total spending in the preceding six months, according to a Des Moines Register analysis of TV station records. …

Although Romney and his allies spent more, the Obama coalition out-advertised them.

About 13,000 more pro-Obama TV ads ran in Iowa than pro-Romney ads during the final weeks."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2012electionanalysis

1 posted on 11/26/2012 10:34:28 AM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Did the station broadcasters give the Obama campaign better rates or something?


2 posted on 11/26/2012 10:37:27 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

It’s something I’ve often wondered about re: campaign advertising.


3 posted on 11/26/2012 10:37:58 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Not hard to figure out ...

Station charges Obie $100 a commercial ... Romney $1000 a commercial.

4 posted on 11/26/2012 10:38:21 AM PST by dartuser ("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I’m pretty sure Romney didn’t lose because he didn’t advertise enough.


5 posted on 11/26/2012 10:38:58 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

No. Romney campaign booked all of the commercials at the last minute, yielding the most expensive rate.

Imagine if you booked all of your airline tickets that way.


6 posted on 11/26/2012 10:39:40 AM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

*sigh* When you’re a feckless idiot you surround yourself with feckless idiots. So they shoved McLame on us, Romney ... I can’t WAIT to see who’s next. *eye roll*


7 posted on 11/26/2012 10:42:11 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Makes sense.


8 posted on 11/26/2012 10:44:49 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Romney’s vaunted business experience was negated by a Marxist Chicago community organizer.
9 posted on 11/26/2012 10:45:09 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Witty saying goes here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

jeb


10 posted on 11/26/2012 10:46:53 AM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

11 posted on 11/26/2012 10:47:26 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (There goes the dominoes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Did the station broadcasters give the Obama campaign better rates or something?

Obama probably bought up the airtime early, Romney later. That was one of the drawbacks to Romney's late saturation tactics, the ad buys had to have been top dollar - at rate card instead of negotiated discounts.

12 posted on 11/26/2012 10:50:04 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the
Current Quarter Expenses.


Donate Today!
FReepathonDay 57!!

13 posted on 11/26/2012 10:54:40 AM PST by RedMDer (Please support Toys for Tots this CHRISTmas season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Just once, I’d like to see a GOP candidate’s campaign run by people who HAVE A F***ING CLUE.

Just to prove they’re not ALL dumbasses.


14 posted on 11/26/2012 10:55:57 AM PST by newgeezer ("... no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God." --Rom. 13:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Romney’s vaunted business experience was negated by a Marxist Chicago community organizer.

A community organizer is just another name for a ward heeler - someone who understands retail politics from the ground up. Romney was doing this from 50,000 feet up. Obama knew all the little things he needed to take care of. Romney's problem (as with Perot) is that he had no experience in politics. He was always a dilettante - a dabbler. He managed to win the 2012 primary and almost win the 2008 primary because he had more money than all the other guys put together. Unfortunately for him, he wasn't able to outspend Obama.

15 posted on 11/26/2012 11:00:09 AM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
The Obama campaign was off and running in Iowa very early in the election cycle; the leftist advocacy groups (Democrat proxies) were saturating the radio and the internet like crazy. For many months, one of the more popular local "workplace easy listening/background noise for sheep" radio staions - leaning leftwards to begin with - was a continual anti-Republican advertisement broken up by occasional music. I'd never witnessed such long-lived and intense pre-emptive media carpet bombing.

"Lie early and lie often" really does work.

Mr. niteowl77

16 posted on 11/26/2012 11:02:19 AM PST by niteowl77 (Getting stuck with other peoples' just desserts good and hard for over 50 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Romney ran a 1980 campaign.

the GOP is DECADES behind the communication curve, the voter minds were set weeks if not months before Romney fired his first real shot. The consultants were calling the race for the wrong decade.


17 posted on 11/26/2012 11:05:08 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Romney's done. Period.

Good riddance...IMO.

Now we have to fight the next weak ass, Dim-lite candidate...the GOP-e forces on us.

18 posted on 11/26/2012 11:05:13 AM PST by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
I was saying this for MONTHS. I live in Texas so I know BHO wasn't spending money here...therefore any commercial I saw for BHO would have had to been national.

I was seeing them EVERYWHERE. I also couldn't go on Facebook, youtube or yahoo without seeing them.

I made the remark back in 2008 that the GOP better learn how to command the 'net and its ad potential. They still haven't learned.

19 posted on 11/26/2012 11:09:39 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

From reading the linked articles it looks like Romney had the same ad rates available to him! but his campaign went with an ad buy stratagy that was more flexible but much more expensive than Obama’s.

I


20 posted on 11/26/2012 11:30:03 AM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio; Utmost Certainty
No. Romney campaign booked all of the commercials at the last minute, yielding the most expensive rate.

That isn't correct. Obama was charged less because they spent huge manpower of chasing the cheapest rates and buy preemptable minutes. Romney's campaign didn't throw manpower at this problem and bought at the far more expensive non-preemptable rates to ensure its ads ran.

Recently there was a very good article showing exactly the disparity in rates paid by the two campaigns in a battleground market and explaining the above.

21 posted on 11/26/2012 11:30:09 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

...Facebook, youtube or yahoo...

...Never, seldom, never...


22 posted on 11/26/2012 12:00:04 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

“Romney’s vaunted business experience was negated by a Marxist Chicago community organizer.”

Not so “commanding” or “inevitable” after all.


23 posted on 11/26/2012 12:21:03 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
This is, at least in part, due to legalities in Federal Election Law that I believe has given this Democrat Incumbent an absolute advantage.

First, broadcasters are required to give Candidate Campaigns the lowest Ad costs. This does not include "SuperPACs" and the like.

Second, a contested Primary leaves the winner in a hold pattern until after that party's convention before being able to spend non-primary advertising dollars. Obama had no primary opponent so he could start attacking Romney as soon as he started to become the obvious GOP candidate.

I DO NOT KNOW if the GOP spending could have started earlier IF all the GOP Primary Opponents had bowed out but the fact is that it was not until September that Romney could do his ad buys. It is hard to fight this stacked deck when it is a law and it could explain this Iowa outcome.

Thus Obama had the entire summer to select, position and buy time and pound Romney with little pro-GOP/Romney response. It seems obvious that if this were a Republican Incumbent, we would have seen the 'UNBIASED' media in full attack mode, but with Obama ... praise and acceptance for the great Won!

24 posted on 11/26/2012 1:11:05 PM PST by SES1066 (Government is NOT the reason for my existence but it is the road to our ruin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
>>>...Never, seldom, never...

Did Romney really need to cut an ad to get you to vote against BHO?

Didn't think so. Therefore, it ain't about you. ;-)

You can either define yourself to this younger...tech indulged generation using their medium...or you can let others do it for you.

25 posted on 11/26/2012 2:59:25 PM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Because Obama didn’t require the spots to be run at a particular time. Also he got them at lower cost because contracted earlier. Romney couldn’t because he wasn’t nominated yet...but RNC could have contracted, but they didn’t.


26 posted on 11/26/2012 4:42:51 PM PST by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson